Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
Digitalization of knowledge work is essential for today’s organizations, responding to diversified employee needs. Many organizations are already implementing some form of flexibility to help workers perform work and non-work duties, while maintaining high productivity. While these changes in workpl...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-07-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5080 |
id |
doaj-721c3c40f4ba43e7bd6302fdde9a0ae4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-721c3c40f4ba43e7bd6302fdde9a0ae42020-11-25T02:35:58ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-07-01175080508010.3390/ijerph17145080Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic ReviewYasuhiro Kotera0Katia Correa Vione1Human Sciences Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, Derbyshire, UKHuman Sciences Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, Derbyshire, UKDigitalization of knowledge work is essential for today’s organizations, responding to diversified employee needs. Many organizations are already implementing some form of flexibility to help workers perform work and non-work duties, while maintaining high productivity. While these changes in workplaces, “New Ways of Working (NWW)”, have been discussed in the literature, a systematic appraisal of evidence of NWW has not been conducted. Relating to poor work-related mental health worldwide, this systematic review analyzed the psychological impacts of NWW, and the quality and quantity of NWW research. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, NWW studies targeting psychological outcomes were evaluated. Initial literature search on ProQuest, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Google Scholar retrieved 308 titles, from which seven articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Our appraisal revealed that NWW research evaluated diverse psychological outcomes. While NWW can help workers’ engagement, work-related flow, and connectivity among staff, NWW can also increase blurred work-home boundary, fatigue, and mental demands. The quality of NWW research was overall medium, needing more rigorous studies. Our findings can inform decision-makers in the workplace to effectively implement NWW, and researchers to improve the quality and the usefulness of future NWW studies.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5080new ways of workingpsychological impactssystematic reviewwork engagementwork-life boundarymental demands |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yasuhiro Kotera Katia Correa Vione |
spellingShingle |
Yasuhiro Kotera Katia Correa Vione Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health new ways of working psychological impacts systematic review work engagement work-life boundary mental demands |
author_facet |
Yasuhiro Kotera Katia Correa Vione |
author_sort |
Yasuhiro Kotera |
title |
Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review |
title_short |
Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review |
title_full |
Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review |
title_sort |
psychological impacts of the new ways of working (nww): a systematic review |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
issn |
1661-7827 1660-4601 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Digitalization of knowledge work is essential for today’s organizations, responding to diversified employee needs. Many organizations are already implementing some form of flexibility to help workers perform work and non-work duties, while maintaining high productivity. While these changes in workplaces, “New Ways of Working (NWW)”, have been discussed in the literature, a systematic appraisal of evidence of NWW has not been conducted. Relating to poor work-related mental health worldwide, this systematic review analyzed the psychological impacts of NWW, and the quality and quantity of NWW research. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, NWW studies targeting psychological outcomes were evaluated. Initial literature search on ProQuest, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Google Scholar retrieved 308 titles, from which seven articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Our appraisal revealed that NWW research evaluated diverse psychological outcomes. While NWW can help workers’ engagement, work-related flow, and connectivity among staff, NWW can also increase blurred work-home boundary, fatigue, and mental demands. The quality of NWW research was overall medium, needing more rigorous studies. Our findings can inform decision-makers in the workplace to effectively implement NWW, and researchers to improve the quality and the usefulness of future NWW studies. |
topic |
new ways of working psychological impacts systematic review work engagement work-life boundary mental demands |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5080 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yasuhirokotera psychologicalimpactsofthenewwaysofworkingnwwasystematicreview AT katiacorreavione psychologicalimpactsofthenewwaysofworkingnwwasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1724802260544782336 |