Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review

Digitalization of knowledge work is essential for today’s organizations, responding to diversified employee needs. Many organizations are already implementing some form of flexibility to help workers perform work and non-work duties, while maintaining high productivity. While these changes in workpl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yasuhiro Kotera, Katia Correa Vione
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5080
id doaj-721c3c40f4ba43e7bd6302fdde9a0ae4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-721c3c40f4ba43e7bd6302fdde9a0ae42020-11-25T02:35:58ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012020-07-01175080508010.3390/ijerph17145080Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic ReviewYasuhiro Kotera0Katia Correa Vione1Human Sciences Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, Derbyshire, UKHuman Sciences Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby DE22 1GB, Derbyshire, UKDigitalization of knowledge work is essential for today’s organizations, responding to diversified employee needs. Many organizations are already implementing some form of flexibility to help workers perform work and non-work duties, while maintaining high productivity. While these changes in workplaces, “New Ways of Working (NWW)”, have been discussed in the literature, a systematic appraisal of evidence of NWW has not been conducted. Relating to poor work-related mental health worldwide, this systematic review analyzed the psychological impacts of NWW, and the quality and quantity of NWW research. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, NWW studies targeting psychological outcomes were evaluated. Initial literature search on ProQuest, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Google Scholar retrieved 308 titles, from which seven articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Our appraisal revealed that NWW research evaluated diverse psychological outcomes. While NWW can help workers’ engagement, work-related flow, and connectivity among staff, NWW can also increase blurred work-home boundary, fatigue, and mental demands. The quality of NWW research was overall medium, needing more rigorous studies. Our findings can inform decision-makers in the workplace to effectively implement NWW, and researchers to improve the quality and the usefulness of future NWW studies.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5080new ways of workingpsychological impactssystematic reviewwork engagementwork-life boundarymental demands
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yasuhiro Kotera
Katia Correa Vione
spellingShingle Yasuhiro Kotera
Katia Correa Vione
Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
new ways of working
psychological impacts
systematic review
work engagement
work-life boundary
mental demands
author_facet Yasuhiro Kotera
Katia Correa Vione
author_sort Yasuhiro Kotera
title Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_short Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_full Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Psychological Impacts of the New Ways of Working (NWW): A Systematic Review
title_sort psychological impacts of the new ways of working (nww): a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Digitalization of knowledge work is essential for today’s organizations, responding to diversified employee needs. Many organizations are already implementing some form of flexibility to help workers perform work and non-work duties, while maintaining high productivity. While these changes in workplaces, “New Ways of Working (NWW)”, have been discussed in the literature, a systematic appraisal of evidence of NWW has not been conducted. Relating to poor work-related mental health worldwide, this systematic review analyzed the psychological impacts of NWW, and the quality and quantity of NWW research. Following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, NWW studies targeting psychological outcomes were evaluated. Initial literature search on ProQuest, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Google Scholar retrieved 308 titles, from which seven articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Our appraisal revealed that NWW research evaluated diverse psychological outcomes. While NWW can help workers’ engagement, work-related flow, and connectivity among staff, NWW can also increase blurred work-home boundary, fatigue, and mental demands. The quality of NWW research was overall medium, needing more rigorous studies. Our findings can inform decision-makers in the workplace to effectively implement NWW, and researchers to improve the quality and the usefulness of future NWW studies.
topic new ways of working
psychological impacts
systematic review
work engagement
work-life boundary
mental demands
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5080
work_keys_str_mv AT yasuhirokotera psychologicalimpactsofthenewwaysofworkingnwwasystematicreview
AT katiacorreavione psychologicalimpactsofthenewwaysofworkingnwwasystematicreview
_version_ 1724802260544782336