Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs

A sample of 58 bilingual and 62 monolingual university students completed four tasks commonly used to test for bilingual advantages in executive functioning (EF): antisaccade, flanker, Simon, and color-shape switching. Across the four tasks, 13 different indices were derived that are assumed to re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kenneth R. Paap, Oliver eSawi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00962/full
id doaj-71f62244361c48c29f60ee51ab6739e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71f62244361c48c29f60ee51ab6739e02020-11-24T23:58:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782014-09-01510.3389/fpsyg.2014.0096292190Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical ConstructsKenneth R. Paap0Oliver eSawi1Oliver eSawi2San Francisco State UniversitySan Francisco State UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutA sample of 58 bilingual and 62 monolingual university students completed four tasks commonly used to test for bilingual advantages in executive functioning (EF): antisaccade, flanker, Simon, and color-shape switching. Across the four tasks, 13 different indices were derived that are assumed to reflect individual differences in inhibitory control, monitoring, or switching. The effects of bilingualism on the 13 measures were explored by directly comparing the means of the two language groups and through regression analyses using a continuous measure of bilingualism and multiple demographic characteristics as predictors. Across the 13 different measures and two types of data analysis there were very few significant results and those that did occur supported a monolingual advantage. An equally important goal was to assess the convergent validity through cross-task correlations of indices assume to measure the same component of executive functioning. Most of the correlations using difference-score measures were nonsignificant and many near zero. Although modestly higher levels of convergent validity are sometimes reported, a review of the existing literature suggests that bilingual advantages (or disadvantages) may reflect task-specific differences that are unlikely to generalize to important general differences in EF. Finally, as cautioned by Salthouse, assumed measures of executive functioning may also be threatened by a lack of divergent validity that separates individual or group differences in EF from those in general fluid intelligence or simple processing speed.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00962/fullExecutive Functionconflict monitoringworking memory capacityInhibitory Controlswitchingconvergent validity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenneth R. Paap
Oliver eSawi
Oliver eSawi
spellingShingle Kenneth R. Paap
Oliver eSawi
Oliver eSawi
Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs
Frontiers in Psychology
Executive Function
conflict monitoring
working memory capacity
Inhibitory Control
switching
convergent validity
author_facet Kenneth R. Paap
Oliver eSawi
Oliver eSawi
author_sort Kenneth R. Paap
title Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs
title_short Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs
title_full Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs
title_fullStr Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs
title_full_unstemmed Bilingual Advantages in Executive Functioning: Problems in Convergent Validity, Discriminant Validity, and the Identification of the Theoretical Constructs
title_sort bilingual advantages in executive functioning: problems in convergent validity, discriminant validity, and the identification of the theoretical constructs
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2014-09-01
description A sample of 58 bilingual and 62 monolingual university students completed four tasks commonly used to test for bilingual advantages in executive functioning (EF): antisaccade, flanker, Simon, and color-shape switching. Across the four tasks, 13 different indices were derived that are assumed to reflect individual differences in inhibitory control, monitoring, or switching. The effects of bilingualism on the 13 measures were explored by directly comparing the means of the two language groups and through regression analyses using a continuous measure of bilingualism and multiple demographic characteristics as predictors. Across the 13 different measures and two types of data analysis there were very few significant results and those that did occur supported a monolingual advantage. An equally important goal was to assess the convergent validity through cross-task correlations of indices assume to measure the same component of executive functioning. Most of the correlations using difference-score measures were nonsignificant and many near zero. Although modestly higher levels of convergent validity are sometimes reported, a review of the existing literature suggests that bilingual advantages (or disadvantages) may reflect task-specific differences that are unlikely to generalize to important general differences in EF. Finally, as cautioned by Salthouse, assumed measures of executive functioning may also be threatened by a lack of divergent validity that separates individual or group differences in EF from those in general fluid intelligence or simple processing speed.
topic Executive Function
conflict monitoring
working memory capacity
Inhibitory Control
switching
convergent validity
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00962/full
work_keys_str_mv AT kennethrpaap bilingualadvantagesinexecutivefunctioningproblemsinconvergentvaliditydiscriminantvalidityandtheidentificationofthetheoreticalconstructs
AT oliveresawi bilingualadvantagesinexecutivefunctioningproblemsinconvergentvaliditydiscriminantvalidityandtheidentificationofthetheoreticalconstructs
AT oliveresawi bilingualadvantagesinexecutivefunctioningproblemsinconvergentvaliditydiscriminantvalidityandtheidentificationofthetheoreticalconstructs
_version_ 1725451597284114432