Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine

Introduction: Levobupivacaine is the pure S (-) enantiomer part of racemic mixture of bupivacaine. It is said to have local anaesthetic properties similar to racemic bupivacaine but with less cardiac toxicity. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of these two local anaes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roma Tejaskumar Kalaria, Mahendra Ramkrishna Upadhyay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2018-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/11327/31422_F(AnG)_PF1(MJ_AP)_PFA(MJ_AnG)_PB(MJ_AnG)PN(AnG).pdf
id doaj-71f0e6b1b56346fe825b411dc8a236dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71f0e6b1b56346fe825b411dc8a236dd2020-11-25T02:56:45ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2018-03-01123UC09UC1310.7860/JCDR/2018/31422.11327Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic BupivacaineRoma Tejaskumar Kalaria0Mahendra Ramkrishna Upadhyay1LAS Core Trainee in Anaesthetics, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, Walsall, West Midlands, United Kingdom.Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Baroda Medical College and Sir Sayajirao Gaekwad Hospital, The Maharaja Sayjirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.Introduction: Levobupivacaine is the pure S (-) enantiomer part of racemic mixture of bupivacaine. It is said to have local anaesthetic properties similar to racemic bupivacaine but with less cardiac toxicity. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of these two local anaesthetic agents in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: One hundred and four American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Grade I-II patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty or hydrocele excision were randomized to receive an intrathecal injection of one of two types of local anaesthetic solutions. Group L patients (n=52) received 3 mL (15 mg) of isobaric levobupivacaine while Group B patients (n=52) received 3 mL (15 mg) of isobaric bupivacaine. Onset of sensory block at L1, peak sensory level attained and time taken for it, two segment regression time from highest sensory level, time for regression back up to L1 level, onset and intensity of motor block, time to attain maximum motor block and its duration were recorded. Vital parameters and adverse effects in relation to spinal anaesthesia were also observed. Quantitative data were presented as mean and standard deviation (mean±Sd) and intergroup data were analysed by unpaired t-test. Results: The two groups were comparable to each other with respect to sensory block characteristics (p>0.05). Time to attain maximum Bromage grade was significantly faster in Group B (8.03±1.91) compared to group L (10.06±1.38); (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in other motor block characteristics, vital parameters and perioperative complications between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Thus, isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) appears to be a good alternative to isobaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernioplasty and hydrocele excision.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/11327/31422_F(AnG)_PF1(MJ_AP)_PFA(MJ_AnG)_PB(MJ_AnG)PN(AnG).pdfanaesthetics localanaesthetic techniquessubarachnoid
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roma Tejaskumar Kalaria
Mahendra Ramkrishna Upadhyay
spellingShingle Roma Tejaskumar Kalaria
Mahendra Ramkrishna Upadhyay
Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
anaesthetics local
anaesthetic techniques
subarachnoid
author_facet Roma Tejaskumar Kalaria
Mahendra Ramkrishna Upadhyay
author_sort Roma Tejaskumar Kalaria
title Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine
title_short Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine
title_full Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine
title_fullStr Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine
title_full_unstemmed Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine
title_sort spinal anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery: levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
issn 2249-782X
0973-709X
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Introduction: Levobupivacaine is the pure S (-) enantiomer part of racemic mixture of bupivacaine. It is said to have local anaesthetic properties similar to racemic bupivacaine but with less cardiac toxicity. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of these two local anaesthetic agents in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: One hundred and four American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Grade I-II patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty or hydrocele excision were randomized to receive an intrathecal injection of one of two types of local anaesthetic solutions. Group L patients (n=52) received 3 mL (15 mg) of isobaric levobupivacaine while Group B patients (n=52) received 3 mL (15 mg) of isobaric bupivacaine. Onset of sensory block at L1, peak sensory level attained and time taken for it, two segment regression time from highest sensory level, time for regression back up to L1 level, onset and intensity of motor block, time to attain maximum motor block and its duration were recorded. Vital parameters and adverse effects in relation to spinal anaesthesia were also observed. Quantitative data were presented as mean and standard deviation (mean±Sd) and intergroup data were analysed by unpaired t-test. Results: The two groups were comparable to each other with respect to sensory block characteristics (p>0.05). Time to attain maximum Bromage grade was significantly faster in Group B (8.03±1.91) compared to group L (10.06±1.38); (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in other motor block characteristics, vital parameters and perioperative complications between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Thus, isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) appears to be a good alternative to isobaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernioplasty and hydrocele excision.
topic anaesthetics local
anaesthetic techniques
subarachnoid
url https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/11327/31422_F(AnG)_PF1(MJ_AP)_PFA(MJ_AnG)_PB(MJ_AnG)PN(AnG).pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT romatejaskumarkalaria spinalanaesthesiaforlowerabdominalsurgerylevobupivacaineversusracemicbupivacaine
AT mahendraramkrishnaupadhyay spinalanaesthesiaforlowerabdominalsurgerylevobupivacaineversusracemicbupivacaine
_version_ 1724712371860013056