Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine
Introduction: Levobupivacaine is the pure S (-) enantiomer part of racemic mixture of bupivacaine. It is said to have local anaesthetic properties similar to racemic bupivacaine but with less cardiac toxicity. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of these two local anaes...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2018-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/11327/31422_F(AnG)_PF1(MJ_AP)_PFA(MJ_AnG)_PB(MJ_AnG)PN(AnG).pdf |
id |
doaj-71f0e6b1b56346fe825b411dc8a236dd |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-71f0e6b1b56346fe825b411dc8a236dd2020-11-25T02:56:45ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2018-03-01123UC09UC1310.7860/JCDR/2018/31422.11327Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic BupivacaineRoma Tejaskumar Kalaria0Mahendra Ramkrishna Upadhyay1LAS Core Trainee in Anaesthetics, Walsall Manor Hospital, Walsall Healthcare NHS Trust, Walsall, West Midlands, United Kingdom.Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Baroda Medical College and Sir Sayajirao Gaekwad Hospital, The Maharaja Sayjirao University of Baroda, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.Introduction: Levobupivacaine is the pure S (-) enantiomer part of racemic mixture of bupivacaine. It is said to have local anaesthetic properties similar to racemic bupivacaine but with less cardiac toxicity. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of these two local anaesthetic agents in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: One hundred and four American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Grade I-II patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty or hydrocele excision were randomized to receive an intrathecal injection of one of two types of local anaesthetic solutions. Group L patients (n=52) received 3 mL (15 mg) of isobaric levobupivacaine while Group B patients (n=52) received 3 mL (15 mg) of isobaric bupivacaine. Onset of sensory block at L1, peak sensory level attained and time taken for it, two segment regression time from highest sensory level, time for regression back up to L1 level, onset and intensity of motor block, time to attain maximum motor block and its duration were recorded. Vital parameters and adverse effects in relation to spinal anaesthesia were also observed. Quantitative data were presented as mean and standard deviation (mean±Sd) and intergroup data were analysed by unpaired t-test. Results: The two groups were comparable to each other with respect to sensory block characteristics (p>0.05). Time to attain maximum Bromage grade was significantly faster in Group B (8.03±1.91) compared to group L (10.06±1.38); (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in other motor block characteristics, vital parameters and perioperative complications between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Thus, isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) appears to be a good alternative to isobaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernioplasty and hydrocele excision.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/11327/31422_F(AnG)_PF1(MJ_AP)_PFA(MJ_AnG)_PB(MJ_AnG)PN(AnG).pdfanaesthetics localanaesthetic techniquessubarachnoid |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Roma Tejaskumar Kalaria Mahendra Ramkrishna Upadhyay |
spellingShingle |
Roma Tejaskumar Kalaria Mahendra Ramkrishna Upadhyay Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research anaesthetics local anaesthetic techniques subarachnoid |
author_facet |
Roma Tejaskumar Kalaria Mahendra Ramkrishna Upadhyay |
author_sort |
Roma Tejaskumar Kalaria |
title |
Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine |
title_short |
Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine |
title_full |
Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine |
title_fullStr |
Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine |
title_full_unstemmed |
Spinal Anaesthesia for Lower Abdominal Surgery: Levobupivacaine versus Racemic Bupivacaine |
title_sort |
spinal anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery: levobupivacaine versus racemic bupivacaine |
publisher |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
series |
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
issn |
2249-782X 0973-709X |
publishDate |
2018-03-01 |
description |
Introduction: Levobupivacaine is the pure S (-) enantiomer part of racemic mixture of bupivacaine. It is said to have local anaesthetic properties similar to racemic bupivacaine but with less cardiac toxicity. Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of these two local anaesthetic agents in patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery under spinal anaesthesia. Materials and Methods: One hundred and four American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Grade I-II patients undergoing inguinal hernioplasty or hydrocele excision were randomized to receive an intrathecal injection of one of two types of local anaesthetic solutions. Group L patients (n=52) received 3 mL (15 mg) of isobaric levobupivacaine while Group B patients (n=52) received 3 mL (15 mg) of isobaric bupivacaine. Onset of sensory block at L1, peak sensory level attained and time taken for it, two segment regression time from highest sensory level, time for regression back up to L1 level, onset and intensity of motor block, time to attain maximum motor block and its duration were recorded. Vital parameters and adverse effects in relation to spinal anaesthesia were also observed. Quantitative data were presented as mean and standard deviation (mean±Sd) and intergroup data were analysed by unpaired t-test. Results: The two groups were comparable to each other with respect to sensory block characteristics (p>0.05). Time to attain maximum Bromage grade was significantly faster in Group B (8.03±1.91) compared to group L (10.06±1.38); (p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in other motor block characteristics, vital parameters and perioperative complications between the two groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Thus, isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) appears to be a good alternative to isobaric bupivacaine (0.5%) in spinal anaesthesia for inguinal hernioplasty and hydrocele excision. |
topic |
anaesthetics local anaesthetic techniques subarachnoid |
url |
https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/11327/31422_F(AnG)_PF1(MJ_AP)_PFA(MJ_AnG)_PB(MJ_AnG)PN(AnG).pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT romatejaskumarkalaria spinalanaesthesiaforlowerabdominalsurgerylevobupivacaineversusracemicbupivacaine AT mahendraramkrishnaupadhyay spinalanaesthesiaforlowerabdominalsurgerylevobupivacaineversusracemicbupivacaine |
_version_ |
1724712371860013056 |