Gilbert Simondon’s ‘Transduction’ as Radical Immanence in Performance

Transduction is Gilbert Simondon’s key concept for understanding processes of differentiation and of individuation in a number of fields, including scientific disciplines, social and human sciences, technological devices, and artistic domains. Originating from the sciences and crucially developed in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paulo de Assis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Performance Philosophy 2017-12-01
Series:Performance Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/140
id doaj-71e74b362a5c4c6f830870d7f2c760e6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71e74b362a5c4c6f830870d7f2c760e62020-11-24T20:42:16ZengPerformance PhilosophyPerformance Philosophy2057-71762017-12-013369571710.21476/PP.2017.3314085Gilbert Simondon’s ‘Transduction’ as Radical Immanence in PerformancePaulo de Assis0Orpheus Institute Gent, BelgiumTransduction is Gilbert Simondon’s key concept for understanding processes of differentiation and of individuation in a number of fields, including scientific disciplines, social and human sciences, technological devices, and artistic domains. Originating from the sciences and crucially developed in its philosophical implications by Simondon, transduction refers to a dynamic operation by which energy is actualized, moving from one state to the next, in a process that individuates new materialities. This chapter appropriates this concept for musical practice, aiming at establishing a foundational conceptual layer for a broader research effort that crucially includes artistic practice—both composition and performance—as its starting and end points. After an introductory depiction of what transduction might mean for a music performer, this paper focuses on the presentation of different definitions of transduction, mainly stemming from Simondon himself, but including two further extensions: one to Deleuze’s concept of haecceity (and via Deleuze, to my own micro-haecceity), the other to Brian Massumi’s notion of corporeality. Keeping in mind the potential of these definitions for the making of music, this essay explores eight different, yet complementary ways of thinking transduction, which are presented in a growing scale of complexity from the incandescent light bulb (3.1.) to the intricacies of decision-making in living organisms (3.8.), passing by the question of time and temporality (3.2.), thermodynamics (3.3.), information theory (3.4.), a redesigned theory of haecceities (3.5.), Riemannian topology (3.6.), and corporeality (3.7.). All these topics are presented here in short, as opening gates to wider fields of inquiry, suggesting future avenues of research, rather than claiming to offer finished thought.https://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/140immanenceDeleuzeSimondonphilosophy of musictransductioncorporealityhaecceity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paulo de Assis
spellingShingle Paulo de Assis
Gilbert Simondon’s ‘Transduction’ as Radical Immanence in Performance
Performance Philosophy
immanence
Deleuze
Simondon
philosophy of music
transduction
corporeality
haecceity
author_facet Paulo de Assis
author_sort Paulo de Assis
title Gilbert Simondon’s ‘Transduction’ as Radical Immanence in Performance
title_short Gilbert Simondon’s ‘Transduction’ as Radical Immanence in Performance
title_full Gilbert Simondon’s ‘Transduction’ as Radical Immanence in Performance
title_fullStr Gilbert Simondon’s ‘Transduction’ as Radical Immanence in Performance
title_full_unstemmed Gilbert Simondon’s ‘Transduction’ as Radical Immanence in Performance
title_sort gilbert simondon’s ‘transduction’ as radical immanence in performance
publisher Performance Philosophy
series Performance Philosophy
issn 2057-7176
publishDate 2017-12-01
description Transduction is Gilbert Simondon’s key concept for understanding processes of differentiation and of individuation in a number of fields, including scientific disciplines, social and human sciences, technological devices, and artistic domains. Originating from the sciences and crucially developed in its philosophical implications by Simondon, transduction refers to a dynamic operation by which energy is actualized, moving from one state to the next, in a process that individuates new materialities. This chapter appropriates this concept for musical practice, aiming at establishing a foundational conceptual layer for a broader research effort that crucially includes artistic practice—both composition and performance—as its starting and end points. After an introductory depiction of what transduction might mean for a music performer, this paper focuses on the presentation of different definitions of transduction, mainly stemming from Simondon himself, but including two further extensions: one to Deleuze’s concept of haecceity (and via Deleuze, to my own micro-haecceity), the other to Brian Massumi’s notion of corporeality. Keeping in mind the potential of these definitions for the making of music, this essay explores eight different, yet complementary ways of thinking transduction, which are presented in a growing scale of complexity from the incandescent light bulb (3.1.) to the intricacies of decision-making in living organisms (3.8.), passing by the question of time and temporality (3.2.), thermodynamics (3.3.), information theory (3.4.), a redesigned theory of haecceities (3.5.), Riemannian topology (3.6.), and corporeality (3.7.). All these topics are presented here in short, as opening gates to wider fields of inquiry, suggesting future avenues of research, rather than claiming to offer finished thought.
topic immanence
Deleuze
Simondon
philosophy of music
transduction
corporeality
haecceity
url https://www.performancephilosophy.org/journal/article/view/140
work_keys_str_mv AT paulodeassis gilbertsimondonstransductionasradicalimmanenceinperformance
_version_ 1716822779595063296