HEMORRHOIDAL ARTERY LIGATION WITH RECTO-ANAL REPAIR VERSUS TRADITIONAL HEMORRHOID-ECTOMY, A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Hemorrhoids, are vascular structures present in the anal canal as cushions that facilitate stool control. When swollen or inflamed they are regarded as hemorrhoidal disease; sometimes they are asymptomatic specially in the internal type which are presented with painless rectal bleeding while externa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdulkareem Jabbar Ghadban Al-Ebadi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: university of basrah 2018-12-01
Series:Basrah Journal of Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bjsrg.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_160090_16b62697968a140bb3572dd1e0279bd5.pdf
id doaj-71da1950e1b74dbeb3205a73279d077a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71da1950e1b74dbeb3205a73279d077a2020-11-25T03:03:38Zenguniversity of basrahBasrah Journal of Surgery1683-35892409-501X2018-12-01242616610.33762/bsurg.2018.160090160090HEMORRHOIDAL ARTERY LIGATION WITH RECTO-ANAL REPAIR VERSUS TRADITIONAL HEMORRHOID-ECTOMY, A COMPARATIVE STUDYAbdulkareem Jabbar Ghadban Al-EbadiHemorrhoids, are vascular structures present in the anal canal as cushions that facilitate stool control. When swollen or inflamed they are regarded as hemorrhoidal disease; sometimes they are asymptomatic specially in the internal type which are presented with painless rectal bleeding while external type may present with painful swelling. Although the traditional open hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan Morgan) is standard and effective technique, it is associated with many complications; the most important is post-operative pain and delayed return to normal activities. Nowadays Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) with recto-anal repair (RAR) is a minimally-invasive technique for hemorrhoids, it is developed recently to overcome these complications. The purpose of this prospective study is to compare between the classical open hemorrhoidectomy and HAL-RAR procedure, by assessment of post-operative pain, postoperative complications and outcome of the procedures. This prospective, study was done between September 2014 and September 2016. Ninety six patients complaining of hemorrhoids were studied at Al-Sadr Teaching Hospital, Basrah, Iraq. They were divided equally into two groups; group A and B, group A underwent surgery by DG HAL and RAR, and group B were subjected to traditional procedure. Patients were followed for one year by evaluation at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year. In conclusion, DG-HAL with RAR is an effective technique compared with traditional hemorrhoidectomy regarding complications, postoperative pain, in hospital stay, and time of return to normal activities.https://bjsrg.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_160090_16b62697968a140bb3572dd1e0279bd5.pdfhemorrhoidal artery ligation with rectoanal repairversus traditional hemorrhoidectomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdulkareem Jabbar Ghadban Al-Ebadi
spellingShingle Abdulkareem Jabbar Ghadban Al-Ebadi
HEMORRHOIDAL ARTERY LIGATION WITH RECTO-ANAL REPAIR VERSUS TRADITIONAL HEMORRHOID-ECTOMY, A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Basrah Journal of Surgery
hemorrhoidal artery ligation with recto
anal repair
versus traditional hemorrhoid
ectomy
author_facet Abdulkareem Jabbar Ghadban Al-Ebadi
author_sort Abdulkareem Jabbar Ghadban Al-Ebadi
title HEMORRHOIDAL ARTERY LIGATION WITH RECTO-ANAL REPAIR VERSUS TRADITIONAL HEMORRHOID-ECTOMY, A COMPARATIVE STUDY
title_short HEMORRHOIDAL ARTERY LIGATION WITH RECTO-ANAL REPAIR VERSUS TRADITIONAL HEMORRHOID-ECTOMY, A COMPARATIVE STUDY
title_full HEMORRHOIDAL ARTERY LIGATION WITH RECTO-ANAL REPAIR VERSUS TRADITIONAL HEMORRHOID-ECTOMY, A COMPARATIVE STUDY
title_fullStr HEMORRHOIDAL ARTERY LIGATION WITH RECTO-ANAL REPAIR VERSUS TRADITIONAL HEMORRHOID-ECTOMY, A COMPARATIVE STUDY
title_full_unstemmed HEMORRHOIDAL ARTERY LIGATION WITH RECTO-ANAL REPAIR VERSUS TRADITIONAL HEMORRHOID-ECTOMY, A COMPARATIVE STUDY
title_sort hemorrhoidal artery ligation with recto-anal repair versus traditional hemorrhoid-ectomy, a comparative study
publisher university of basrah
series Basrah Journal of Surgery
issn 1683-3589
2409-501X
publishDate 2018-12-01
description Hemorrhoids, are vascular structures present in the anal canal as cushions that facilitate stool control. When swollen or inflamed they are regarded as hemorrhoidal disease; sometimes they are asymptomatic specially in the internal type which are presented with painless rectal bleeding while external type may present with painful swelling. Although the traditional open hemorrhoidectomy (Milligan Morgan) is standard and effective technique, it is associated with many complications; the most important is post-operative pain and delayed return to normal activities. Nowadays Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL) with recto-anal repair (RAR) is a minimally-invasive technique for hemorrhoids, it is developed recently to overcome these complications. The purpose of this prospective study is to compare between the classical open hemorrhoidectomy and HAL-RAR procedure, by assessment of post-operative pain, postoperative complications and outcome of the procedures. This prospective, study was done between September 2014 and September 2016. Ninety six patients complaining of hemorrhoids were studied at Al-Sadr Teaching Hospital, Basrah, Iraq. They were divided equally into two groups; group A and B, group A underwent surgery by DG HAL and RAR, and group B were subjected to traditional procedure. Patients were followed for one year by evaluation at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1 year. In conclusion, DG-HAL with RAR is an effective technique compared with traditional hemorrhoidectomy regarding complications, postoperative pain, in hospital stay, and time of return to normal activities.
topic hemorrhoidal artery ligation with recto
anal repair
versus traditional hemorrhoid
ectomy
url https://bjsrg.uobasrah.edu.iq/article_160090_16b62697968a140bb3572dd1e0279bd5.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulkareemjabbarghadbanalebadi hemorrhoidalarteryligationwithrectoanalrepairversustraditionalhemorrhoidectomyacomparativestudy
_version_ 1724684675731947520