Selecting a Contextualized Set of Urban Quality of Life Indicators: Results of a Delphi Consensus Procedure

Although indicators are commonly used to measure/assess urban quality of life (QOL), there is no consensus in the literature on the core indicators of urban QOL. This paper aims to identify a set of key indicators that will be used to assess/measure urban QOL in the Saudi Arabia (SA) context. For th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jamal Al-Qawasmi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4945
id doaj-71b5ed5c9fcc4e4eb3ab1469c495f9df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71b5ed5c9fcc4e4eb3ab1469c495f9df2021-04-28T23:04:25ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-04-01134945494510.3390/su13094945Selecting a Contextualized Set of Urban Quality of Life Indicators: Results of a Delphi Consensus ProcedureJamal Al-Qawasmi0Architecture Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM), Dhahran 31261, Saudi ArabiaAlthough indicators are commonly used to measure/assess urban quality of life (QOL), there is no consensus in the literature on the core indicators of urban QOL. This paper aims to identify a set of key indicators that will be used to assess/measure urban QOL in the Saudi Arabia (SA) context. For this purpose, a three-round online Delphi procedure is used. A group of 92 local experts were asked to rate the importance of a set of pre-defined indicators in assessing/measuring urban QOL. The results reveal that the panel of experts reached consensus and agreed on the high importance of 53 indicators for assessing/measuring urban QOL. These indicators provide appropriate coverage of the three core dimensions of urban QOL: environmental, social and economic. However, the results also show that the social indicators are perceived as more essential than economic and environmental indicators. This finding has practical implications for designing and developing QOL assessment tools to better capture and measure urban QOL in the SA context. Furthermore, research findings also identified some methodological limitations associated with using the Delphi approach, which need to be addressed to ensure the development of comprehensive QOL assessment tools.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4945urban quality of lifequality of life assessment toolsurban quality of life indicatorsDelphi techniqueurban developmentcities
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jamal Al-Qawasmi
spellingShingle Jamal Al-Qawasmi
Selecting a Contextualized Set of Urban Quality of Life Indicators: Results of a Delphi Consensus Procedure
Sustainability
urban quality of life
quality of life assessment tools
urban quality of life indicators
Delphi technique
urban development
cities
author_facet Jamal Al-Qawasmi
author_sort Jamal Al-Qawasmi
title Selecting a Contextualized Set of Urban Quality of Life Indicators: Results of a Delphi Consensus Procedure
title_short Selecting a Contextualized Set of Urban Quality of Life Indicators: Results of a Delphi Consensus Procedure
title_full Selecting a Contextualized Set of Urban Quality of Life Indicators: Results of a Delphi Consensus Procedure
title_fullStr Selecting a Contextualized Set of Urban Quality of Life Indicators: Results of a Delphi Consensus Procedure
title_full_unstemmed Selecting a Contextualized Set of Urban Quality of Life Indicators: Results of a Delphi Consensus Procedure
title_sort selecting a contextualized set of urban quality of life indicators: results of a delphi consensus procedure
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Although indicators are commonly used to measure/assess urban quality of life (QOL), there is no consensus in the literature on the core indicators of urban QOL. This paper aims to identify a set of key indicators that will be used to assess/measure urban QOL in the Saudi Arabia (SA) context. For this purpose, a three-round online Delphi procedure is used. A group of 92 local experts were asked to rate the importance of a set of pre-defined indicators in assessing/measuring urban QOL. The results reveal that the panel of experts reached consensus and agreed on the high importance of 53 indicators for assessing/measuring urban QOL. These indicators provide appropriate coverage of the three core dimensions of urban QOL: environmental, social and economic. However, the results also show that the social indicators are perceived as more essential than economic and environmental indicators. This finding has practical implications for designing and developing QOL assessment tools to better capture and measure urban QOL in the SA context. Furthermore, research findings also identified some methodological limitations associated with using the Delphi approach, which need to be addressed to ensure the development of comprehensive QOL assessment tools.
topic urban quality of life
quality of life assessment tools
urban quality of life indicators
Delphi technique
urban development
cities
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/9/4945
work_keys_str_mv AT jamalalqawasmi selectingacontextualizedsetofurbanqualityoflifeindicatorsresultsofadelphiconsensusprocedure
_version_ 1721502932473479168