Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis

Abstract Background The Nelson mortality results were presented in September 2018. Four other randomized control trials (RCTs) were also reported the latest mortality outcomes in 2018 and 2019. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to update the evidence and investigate the benefits and harms of lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kai-Lin Huang, Shih-Yuan Wang, Wan-Chen Lu, Ya-Hui Chang, Jian Su, Yen-Ta Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-019-0883-x
id doaj-71a76bbb37554f72878f3e1d62f20a7c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71a76bbb37554f72878f3e1d62f20a7c2020-11-25T03:24:09ZengBMCBMC Pulmonary Medicine1471-24662019-07-0119111110.1186/s12890-019-0883-xEffects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysisKai-Lin Huang0Shih-Yuan Wang1Wan-Chen Lu2Ya-Hui Chang3Jian Su4Yen-Ta Lu5Department of Pharmacy, MacKay Memorial HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, MacKay Memorial HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, MacKay Memorial HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy, MacKay Memorial HospitalDepartment of Chest Medicine, MacKay Memorial HospitalDepartment of Chest Medicine, MacKay Memorial HospitalAbstract Background The Nelson mortality results were presented in September 2018. Four other randomized control trials (RCTs) were also reported the latest mortality outcomes in 2018 and 2019. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to update the evidence and investigate the benefits and harms of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in lung cancer screening. Methods Detailed electronic database searches were performed to identify reports of RCTs that comparing LDCT to any other type of lung cancer screening. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effects models. Results We identified nine RCTs (n = 97,244 participants). In pooled analyses LDCT reduced lung cancer mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.90, I2 = 1%) but had no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90–1.00). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) confirmed the results of our meta-analysis. Subgroup defined by high quality trials benefitted from LDCT screening in reducing lung cancer mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.91, I2 = 7%), whereas no benefit observed in other low quality RCTs. LDCT was associated with detection of a significantly higher number of early stage lung cancers than the control. No significant difference (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30–1.33) was found in mortality after invasive procedures between two groups. Conclusions In meta-analysis based on sufficient evidence demonstrated by TSA suggests that LDCT screening is superiority over usual care in lung cancer survival. The benefit of LDCT is expected to be heavily influenced by the risk of lung cancer in the different target group (smoking status, Asian) being screened.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-019-0883-xLow-dose computed tomographyLDCTLung cancer screeningMortalityMeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kai-Lin Huang
Shih-Yuan Wang
Wan-Chen Lu
Ya-Hui Chang
Jian Su
Yen-Ta Lu
spellingShingle Kai-Lin Huang
Shih-Yuan Wang
Wan-Chen Lu
Ya-Hui Chang
Jian Su
Yen-Ta Lu
Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
Low-dose computed tomography
LDCT
Lung cancer screening
Mortality
Meta-analysis
author_facet Kai-Lin Huang
Shih-Yuan Wang
Wan-Chen Lu
Ya-Hui Chang
Jian Su
Yen-Ta Lu
author_sort Kai-Lin Huang
title Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_short Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_full Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_fullStr Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
title_sort effects of low-dose computed tomography on lung cancer screening: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Pulmonary Medicine
issn 1471-2466
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract Background The Nelson mortality results were presented in September 2018. Four other randomized control trials (RCTs) were also reported the latest mortality outcomes in 2018 and 2019. We therefore conducted a meta-analysis to update the evidence and investigate the benefits and harms of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in lung cancer screening. Methods Detailed electronic database searches were performed to identify reports of RCTs that comparing LDCT to any other type of lung cancer screening. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using random effects models. Results We identified nine RCTs (n = 97,244 participants). In pooled analyses LDCT reduced lung cancer mortality (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.76–0.90, I2 = 1%) but had no effect on all-cause mortality (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90–1.00). Trial sequential analysis (TSA) confirmed the results of our meta-analysis. Subgroup defined by high quality trials benefitted from LDCT screening in reducing lung cancer mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.91, I2 = 7%), whereas no benefit observed in other low quality RCTs. LDCT was associated with detection of a significantly higher number of early stage lung cancers than the control. No significant difference (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.30–1.33) was found in mortality after invasive procedures between two groups. Conclusions In meta-analysis based on sufficient evidence demonstrated by TSA suggests that LDCT screening is superiority over usual care in lung cancer survival. The benefit of LDCT is expected to be heavily influenced by the risk of lung cancer in the different target group (smoking status, Asian) being screened.
topic Low-dose computed tomography
LDCT
Lung cancer screening
Mortality
Meta-analysis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12890-019-0883-x
work_keys_str_mv AT kailinhuang effectsoflowdosecomputedtomographyonlungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT shihyuanwang effectsoflowdosecomputedtomographyonlungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT wanchenlu effectsoflowdosecomputedtomographyonlungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yahuichang effectsoflowdosecomputedtomographyonlungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT jiansu effectsoflowdosecomputedtomographyonlungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT yentalu effectsoflowdosecomputedtomographyonlungcancerscreeningasystematicreviewmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
_version_ 1724603019759190016