A review of minimally invasive techniques for correction of adult spine deformity

This paper highlights the current status of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), with special attention to learning curve, cost-effectiveness, and different techniques, for the correction of adult spine deformity (ASD). A literature review was performed through the PubMed database. Studies that fit the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aniruddh Agrawal, Neel Anand, Anisha Agrawal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Spine Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2020;volume=3;issue=1;spage=26;epage=33;aulast=Agrawal
id doaj-71a3f8843874406e9ec18682055e3376
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71a3f8843874406e9ec18682055e33762021-06-02T07:29:17ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Spine Journal2589-50792589-50872020-01-0131263310.4103/isj.isj_30_19A review of minimally invasive techniques for correction of adult spine deformityAniruddh AgrawalNeel AnandAnisha AgrawalThis paper highlights the current status of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), with special attention to learning curve, cost-effectiveness, and different techniques, for the correction of adult spine deformity (ASD). A literature review was performed through the PubMed database. Studies that fit the inclusion criteria (n = 27) were analyzed by the authors through the MINORS criteria and their results were then presented. The abundance of data on the learning curve of the procedure shows that it takes at least 22–39 surgeries for a surgeon to reach optimal operative time. The literature search showed that there is a paucity of data available on the cost-effectiveness of the procedure in developing countries; however, if the results from the developed countries were to be considered, MIS is cost-effective for ASD correction. There are certain limitations to the procedure including inadequate sagittal balance as well as chances of proximal junctional kyphosis and adjacent segment disease; however, the overall benefits of MIS including decreased operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay could tilt the balance in its favor.http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2020;volume=3;issue=1;spage=26;epage=33;aulast=Agrawalcost-effectivelearning curveminimally invasive surgeryscoliosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aniruddh Agrawal
Neel Anand
Anisha Agrawal
spellingShingle Aniruddh Agrawal
Neel Anand
Anisha Agrawal
A review of minimally invasive techniques for correction of adult spine deformity
Indian Spine Journal
cost-effective
learning curve
minimally invasive surgery
scoliosis
author_facet Aniruddh Agrawal
Neel Anand
Anisha Agrawal
author_sort Aniruddh Agrawal
title A review of minimally invasive techniques for correction of adult spine deformity
title_short A review of minimally invasive techniques for correction of adult spine deformity
title_full A review of minimally invasive techniques for correction of adult spine deformity
title_fullStr A review of minimally invasive techniques for correction of adult spine deformity
title_full_unstemmed A review of minimally invasive techniques for correction of adult spine deformity
title_sort review of minimally invasive techniques for correction of adult spine deformity
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Spine Journal
issn 2589-5079
2589-5087
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This paper highlights the current status of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), with special attention to learning curve, cost-effectiveness, and different techniques, for the correction of adult spine deformity (ASD). A literature review was performed through the PubMed database. Studies that fit the inclusion criteria (n = 27) were analyzed by the authors through the MINORS criteria and their results were then presented. The abundance of data on the learning curve of the procedure shows that it takes at least 22–39 surgeries for a surgeon to reach optimal operative time. The literature search showed that there is a paucity of data available on the cost-effectiveness of the procedure in developing countries; however, if the results from the developed countries were to be considered, MIS is cost-effective for ASD correction. There are certain limitations to the procedure including inadequate sagittal balance as well as chances of proximal junctional kyphosis and adjacent segment disease; however, the overall benefits of MIS including decreased operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay could tilt the balance in its favor.
topic cost-effective
learning curve
minimally invasive surgery
scoliosis
url http://www.isjonline.com/article.asp?issn=2589-5079;year=2020;volume=3;issue=1;spage=26;epage=33;aulast=Agrawal
work_keys_str_mv AT aniruddhagrawal areviewofminimallyinvasivetechniquesforcorrectionofadultspinedeformity
AT neelanand areviewofminimallyinvasivetechniquesforcorrectionofadultspinedeformity
AT anishaagrawal areviewofminimallyinvasivetechniquesforcorrectionofadultspinedeformity
AT aniruddhagrawal reviewofminimallyinvasivetechniquesforcorrectionofadultspinedeformity
AT neelanand reviewofminimallyinvasivetechniquesforcorrectionofadultspinedeformity
AT anishaagrawal reviewofminimallyinvasivetechniquesforcorrectionofadultspinedeformity
_version_ 1721407050690330624