Reducing Redundant Alarms in the Pediatric ICU

Physiologic monitors generate alarms to alert clinicians to signs of instability. However, these monitors also create alarm fatigue that places patients at risk. Redundant alarms have contributed to alarm fatigue without improving patient safety. In this study, our specific aim was to decrease the m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maya Dewan, Lindsay Cipriani, Jacqueline Boyer, Julie Stark, Brandy Seger, Ken Tegtmeyer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-02-01
Series:Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/3/1/11
id doaj-71943296d3294b0aa203530401976c66
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71943296d3294b0aa203530401976c662020-11-24T20:48:14ZengMDPI AGMultimodal Technologies and Interaction2414-40882019-02-01311110.3390/mti3010011mti3010011Reducing Redundant Alarms in the Pediatric ICUMaya Dewan0Lindsay Cipriani1Jacqueline Boyer2Julie Stark3Brandy Seger4Ken Tegtmeyer5Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USACincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USACincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USACincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USACincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USADepartment of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USAPhysiologic monitors generate alarms to alert clinicians to signs of instability. However, these monitors also create alarm fatigue that places patients at risk. Redundant alarms have contributed to alarm fatigue without improving patient safety. In this study, our specific aim was to decrease the median percentage of redundant alarms by 50% within 6 months using the Model for Improvement. Our primary outcome was to lower the percentage of redundant alarms. We used the overall alarm rate per patient per day and code blue events as balancing metrics. We completed three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and generated run charts using standard industry criteria to determine the special cause. Ultimately, we decreased redundant alarms from a baseline of 6.4% of all alarms to 1.8%, surpassing our aim of a 50% reduction. Our overall alarm rate, one of our balancing metrics, decreased from 137 alarms/patient day to 118 alarms/patient day during the intervention period. No code blue events were determined to be related to incorrect setting of alarms. Decreasing redundant alarms is safe and feasible. Following a reduction in redundant alarms, more intensive alarm reduction methods are needed to continue to reduce alarm fatigue while keeping patients safe.https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/3/1/11alarm fatiguecritical carepediatrics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maya Dewan
Lindsay Cipriani
Jacqueline Boyer
Julie Stark
Brandy Seger
Ken Tegtmeyer
spellingShingle Maya Dewan
Lindsay Cipriani
Jacqueline Boyer
Julie Stark
Brandy Seger
Ken Tegtmeyer
Reducing Redundant Alarms in the Pediatric ICU
Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
alarm fatigue
critical care
pediatrics
author_facet Maya Dewan
Lindsay Cipriani
Jacqueline Boyer
Julie Stark
Brandy Seger
Ken Tegtmeyer
author_sort Maya Dewan
title Reducing Redundant Alarms in the Pediatric ICU
title_short Reducing Redundant Alarms in the Pediatric ICU
title_full Reducing Redundant Alarms in the Pediatric ICU
title_fullStr Reducing Redundant Alarms in the Pediatric ICU
title_full_unstemmed Reducing Redundant Alarms in the Pediatric ICU
title_sort reducing redundant alarms in the pediatric icu
publisher MDPI AG
series Multimodal Technologies and Interaction
issn 2414-4088
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Physiologic monitors generate alarms to alert clinicians to signs of instability. However, these monitors also create alarm fatigue that places patients at risk. Redundant alarms have contributed to alarm fatigue without improving patient safety. In this study, our specific aim was to decrease the median percentage of redundant alarms by 50% within 6 months using the Model for Improvement. Our primary outcome was to lower the percentage of redundant alarms. We used the overall alarm rate per patient per day and code blue events as balancing metrics. We completed three Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles and generated run charts using standard industry criteria to determine the special cause. Ultimately, we decreased redundant alarms from a baseline of 6.4% of all alarms to 1.8%, surpassing our aim of a 50% reduction. Our overall alarm rate, one of our balancing metrics, decreased from 137 alarms/patient day to 118 alarms/patient day during the intervention period. No code blue events were determined to be related to incorrect setting of alarms. Decreasing redundant alarms is safe and feasible. Following a reduction in redundant alarms, more intensive alarm reduction methods are needed to continue to reduce alarm fatigue while keeping patients safe.
topic alarm fatigue
critical care
pediatrics
url https://www.mdpi.com/2414-4088/3/1/11
work_keys_str_mv AT mayadewan reducingredundantalarmsinthepediatricicu
AT lindsaycipriani reducingredundantalarmsinthepediatricicu
AT jacquelineboyer reducingredundantalarmsinthepediatricicu
AT juliestark reducingredundantalarmsinthepediatricicu
AT brandyseger reducingredundantalarmsinthepediatricicu
AT kentegtmeyer reducingredundantalarmsinthepediatricicu
_version_ 1716808495043444736