Level of understanding of revision of biomedical waste rules, 2016 among nursing students in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh

Introduction: Biomedical Waste Management (BMW) Rules came into legislation in 1998 with periodic amendments; two in 2000, one in 2003 with latest revision of rules in 2016. It is essential to assess the level of awareness of health personnel regarding revisions in health related policies so that th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ankit Chaudhary, Anjali Mahajan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cjhr.org/article.asp?issn=2348-3334;year=2018;volume=5;issue=2;spage=127;epage=132;aulast=Chaudhary
id doaj-718ec50bf6d44deb9104048c17cab796
record_format Article
spelling doaj-718ec50bf6d44deb9104048c17cab7962020-11-24T22:30:47ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsCHRISMED Journal of Health and Research2348-33342348-506X2018-01-015212713210.4103/cjhr.cjhr_58_17Level of understanding of revision of biomedical waste rules, 2016 among nursing students in Shimla, Himachal PradeshAnkit ChaudharyAnjali MahajanIntroduction: Biomedical Waste Management (BMW) Rules came into legislation in 1998 with periodic amendments; two in 2000, one in 2003 with latest revision of rules in 2016. It is essential to assess the level of awareness of health personnel regarding revisions in health related policies so that they are updated adequately for provision of quality health care services. Methodology: A cross sectional study was undertaken in November 2016 among 203 nursing students students to ascertain their level of understanding of recent amendments in BMW management rules. A 35 item, self administered, pretested, structured, closed ended, anonymous questionnaire was used for data collection. Results: The scores of the majority (86.2%) of the participants fell in poor category, 13.3% in fair, only 0.5% in good while none in excellent category. The scores gradually increased from second to final year; 9.80 ± 2.36, 11.38 ± 2.48 and 12.02 ± 2.79 respectively (P < 0.001). Nearly 60.3% and 86.2% of the participants showed positive attitude and safe practice habits respectively. Conclusion: For effective implementation of biomedical waste management practices in the hospitals; periodic sensitization and continuous training programs focusing on the recent amendments and advances should be made mandatory.http://www.cjhr.org/article.asp?issn=2348-3334;year=2018;volume=5;issue=2;spage=127;epage=132;aulast=ChaudharyBiomedical wastebiomedical waste management rulesnursing students
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ankit Chaudhary
Anjali Mahajan
spellingShingle Ankit Chaudhary
Anjali Mahajan
Level of understanding of revision of biomedical waste rules, 2016 among nursing students in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research
Biomedical waste
biomedical waste management rules
nursing students
author_facet Ankit Chaudhary
Anjali Mahajan
author_sort Ankit Chaudhary
title Level of understanding of revision of biomedical waste rules, 2016 among nursing students in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
title_short Level of understanding of revision of biomedical waste rules, 2016 among nursing students in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
title_full Level of understanding of revision of biomedical waste rules, 2016 among nursing students in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
title_fullStr Level of understanding of revision of biomedical waste rules, 2016 among nursing students in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
title_full_unstemmed Level of understanding of revision of biomedical waste rules, 2016 among nursing students in Shimla, Himachal Pradesh
title_sort level of understanding of revision of biomedical waste rules, 2016 among nursing students in shimla, himachal pradesh
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series CHRISMED Journal of Health and Research
issn 2348-3334
2348-506X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Introduction: Biomedical Waste Management (BMW) Rules came into legislation in 1998 with periodic amendments; two in 2000, one in 2003 with latest revision of rules in 2016. It is essential to assess the level of awareness of health personnel regarding revisions in health related policies so that they are updated adequately for provision of quality health care services. Methodology: A cross sectional study was undertaken in November 2016 among 203 nursing students students to ascertain their level of understanding of recent amendments in BMW management rules. A 35 item, self administered, pretested, structured, closed ended, anonymous questionnaire was used for data collection. Results: The scores of the majority (86.2%) of the participants fell in poor category, 13.3% in fair, only 0.5% in good while none in excellent category. The scores gradually increased from second to final year; 9.80 ± 2.36, 11.38 ± 2.48 and 12.02 ± 2.79 respectively (P < 0.001). Nearly 60.3% and 86.2% of the participants showed positive attitude and safe practice habits respectively. Conclusion: For effective implementation of biomedical waste management practices in the hospitals; periodic sensitization and continuous training programs focusing on the recent amendments and advances should be made mandatory.
topic Biomedical waste
biomedical waste management rules
nursing students
url http://www.cjhr.org/article.asp?issn=2348-3334;year=2018;volume=5;issue=2;spage=127;epage=132;aulast=Chaudhary
work_keys_str_mv AT ankitchaudhary levelofunderstandingofrevisionofbiomedicalwasterules2016amongnursingstudentsinshimlahimachalpradesh
AT anjalimahajan levelofunderstandingofrevisionofbiomedicalwasterules2016amongnursingstudentsinshimlahimachalpradesh
_version_ 1725739416699273216