Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie
p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; line-height: 150%" class="MsoNormal"spanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"The present paper situates Castoriadisrsquo; later philosophy of nature as part of wider debates on the problematic of lsquo;lifersquo;, especially within...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cosmos and History Publishing Co-op.
2008-10-01
|
Series: | Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/108 |
id |
doaj-7176d0aeb83b4d3da5ee93903b028c04 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7176d0aeb83b4d3da5ee93903b028c042020-11-25T00:46:51ZengCosmos and History Publishing Co-op.Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy1832-91012008-10-0141-2387400Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' NaturphilosophieSuzi Adamsp style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; line-height: 150%" class="MsoNormal"spanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"The present paper situates Castoriadisrsquo; later philosophy of nature as part of wider debates on the problematic of lsquo;lifersquo;, especially within French phenomenology.spannbsp; /spanThrough hermeneutical reconstruction, it argues that lsquo;lifersquo;, as understood by Castoriadis, means auto-poietic modes of being. Castoriadisrsquo; interpretation of auto-poiesis is specific; it refers to self-moving and self-creating modes of being in the radical sense of ontological creation of form. In considering the German distinction made in phenomenological discussions between lsquo;lifersquo; as lsquo;being aliversquo; (emleben/em), and lsquo;lifersquo; as lsquo;experience of somethingrsquo; or as lsquo;existencersquo; (emerleben/em), the paper contends that Castoriadisrsquo; contribution is twofold. First, lsquo;lifersquo; in the broad sense is extended to all regions of being, that is, to include physical nature. Second, the lsquo;subjective instancersquo; of life (as emerleben/em) is instaurated with the living being. In Castoriadisrsquo; thought, however, this is centrally connected with the co-creationspannbsp; /spanof lsquo;the worldrsquo; as a horizon of proto-meaning on the one hand, and the imagination on the other. Finally, in that Castoriadisrsquo; ontology of nature puts into question the modern scientific view of the world ndash; and its underlying metaphysics ndash;spannbsp; /spanthe paper concludes that Castoriadisrsquo; later emNaturphilosophie/em is to be understood as part of the project of autonomy. /font/span/pspanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"nbsp;/font/span http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/108OntologyPhenomenologyNatureLifeCastoriadisMerleau-Ponty |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Suzi Adams |
spellingShingle |
Suzi Adams Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy Ontology Phenomenology Nature Life Castoriadis Merleau-Ponty |
author_facet |
Suzi Adams |
author_sort |
Suzi Adams |
title |
Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie |
title_short |
Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie |
title_full |
Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie |
title_fullStr |
Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie |
title_full_unstemmed |
Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie |
title_sort |
towards a post-phenomenology of life: castoriadis' naturphilosophie |
publisher |
Cosmos and History Publishing Co-op. |
series |
Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy |
issn |
1832-9101 |
publishDate |
2008-10-01 |
description |
p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; line-height: 150%" class="MsoNormal"spanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"The present paper situates Castoriadisrsquo; later philosophy of nature as part of wider debates on the problematic of lsquo;lifersquo;, especially within French phenomenology.spannbsp; /spanThrough hermeneutical reconstruction, it argues that lsquo;lifersquo;, as understood by Castoriadis, means auto-poietic modes of being. Castoriadisrsquo; interpretation of auto-poiesis is specific; it refers to self-moving and self-creating modes of being in the radical sense of ontological creation of form. In considering the German distinction made in phenomenological discussions between lsquo;lifersquo; as lsquo;being aliversquo; (emleben/em), and lsquo;lifersquo; as lsquo;experience of somethingrsquo; or as lsquo;existencersquo; (emerleben/em), the paper contends that Castoriadisrsquo; contribution is twofold. First, lsquo;lifersquo; in the broad sense is extended to all regions of being, that is, to include physical nature. Second, the lsquo;subjective instancersquo; of life (as emerleben/em) is instaurated with the living being. In Castoriadisrsquo; thought, however, this is centrally connected with the co-creationspannbsp; /spanof lsquo;the worldrsquo; as a horizon of proto-meaning on the one hand, and the imagination on the other. Finally, in that Castoriadisrsquo; ontology of nature puts into question the modern scientific view of the world ndash; and its underlying metaphysics ndash;spannbsp; /spanthe paper concludes that Castoriadisrsquo; later emNaturphilosophie/em is to be understood as part of the project of autonomy. /font/span/pspanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"nbsp;/font/span |
topic |
Ontology Phenomenology Nature Life Castoriadis Merleau-Ponty |
url |
http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/108 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT suziadams towardsapostphenomenologyoflifecastoriadisnaturphilosophie |
_version_ |
1725262646878404608 |