Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie

p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; line-height: 150%" class="MsoNormal"spanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"The present paper situates Castoriadisrsquo; later philosophy of nature as part of wider debates on the problematic of lsquo;lifersquo;, especially within...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Suzi Adams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cosmos and History Publishing Co-op. 2008-10-01
Series:Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/108
id doaj-7176d0aeb83b4d3da5ee93903b028c04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7176d0aeb83b4d3da5ee93903b028c042020-11-25T00:46:51ZengCosmos and History Publishing Co-op.Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy1832-91012008-10-0141-2387400Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' NaturphilosophieSuzi Adamsp style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; line-height: 150%" class="MsoNormal"spanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"The present paper situates Castoriadisrsquo; later philosophy of nature as part of wider debates on the problematic of lsquo;lifersquo;, especially within French phenomenology.spannbsp; /spanThrough hermeneutical reconstruction, it argues that lsquo;lifersquo;, as understood by Castoriadis, means auto-poietic modes of being. Castoriadisrsquo; interpretation of auto-poiesis is specific; it refers to self-moving and self-creating modes of being in the radical sense of ontological creation of form. In considering the German distinction made in phenomenological discussions between lsquo;lifersquo; as lsquo;being aliversquo; (emleben/em), and lsquo;lifersquo; as lsquo;experience of somethingrsquo; or as lsquo;existencersquo; (emerleben/em), the paper contends that Castoriadisrsquo; contribution is twofold. First, lsquo;lifersquo; in the broad sense is extended to all regions of being, that is, to include physical nature. Second, the lsquo;subjective instancersquo; of life (as emerleben/em) is instaurated with the living being. In Castoriadisrsquo; thought, however, this is centrally connected with the co-creationspannbsp; /spanof lsquo;the worldrsquo; as a horizon of proto-meaning on the one hand, and the imagination on the other. Finally, in that Castoriadisrsquo; ontology of nature puts into question the modern scientific view of the world ndash; and its underlying metaphysics ndash;spannbsp; /spanthe paper concludes that Castoriadisrsquo; later emNaturphilosophie/em is to be understood as part of the project of autonomy. /font/span/pspanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"nbsp;/font/span http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/108OntologyPhenomenologyNatureLifeCastoriadisMerleau-Ponty
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Suzi Adams
spellingShingle Suzi Adams
Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie
Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy
Ontology
Phenomenology
Nature
Life
Castoriadis
Merleau-Ponty
author_facet Suzi Adams
author_sort Suzi Adams
title Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie
title_short Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie
title_full Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie
title_fullStr Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Post-Phenomenology of Life: Castoriadis' Naturphilosophie
title_sort towards a post-phenomenology of life: castoriadis' naturphilosophie
publisher Cosmos and History Publishing Co-op.
series Cosmos and History : the Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy
issn 1832-9101
publishDate 2008-10-01
description p style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt; line-height: 150%" class="MsoNormal"spanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"The present paper situates Castoriadisrsquo; later philosophy of nature as part of wider debates on the problematic of lsquo;lifersquo;, especially within French phenomenology.spannbsp; /spanThrough hermeneutical reconstruction, it argues that lsquo;lifersquo;, as understood by Castoriadis, means auto-poietic modes of being. Castoriadisrsquo; interpretation of auto-poiesis is specific; it refers to self-moving and self-creating modes of being in the radical sense of ontological creation of form. In considering the German distinction made in phenomenological discussions between lsquo;lifersquo; as lsquo;being aliversquo; (emleben/em), and lsquo;lifersquo; as lsquo;experience of somethingrsquo; or as lsquo;existencersquo; (emerleben/em), the paper contends that Castoriadisrsquo; contribution is twofold. First, lsquo;lifersquo; in the broad sense is extended to all regions of being, that is, to include physical nature. Second, the lsquo;subjective instancersquo; of life (as emerleben/em) is instaurated with the living being. In Castoriadisrsquo; thought, however, this is centrally connected with the co-creationspannbsp; /spanof lsquo;the worldrsquo; as a horizon of proto-meaning on the one hand, and the imagination on the other. Finally, in that Castoriadisrsquo; ontology of nature puts into question the modern scientific view of the world ndash; and its underlying metaphysics ndash;spannbsp; /spanthe paper concludes that Castoriadisrsquo; later emNaturphilosophie/em is to be understood as part of the project of autonomy. /font/span/pspanfont face="Times New Roman" size="3"nbsp;/font/span
topic Ontology
Phenomenology
Nature
Life
Castoriadis
Merleau-Ponty
url http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/108
work_keys_str_mv AT suziadams towardsapostphenomenologyoflifecastoriadisnaturphilosophie
_version_ 1725262646878404608