Defining the Term "Argument"
Informal logic has expanded the concept of an 'argument' beyond that presented traditionally by formal logicians-to include arguments as encountered in 'real-life'. Existent definitions of argument structure are argued to be inadequate by failing to fully recognise that, ultimate...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
1993-01-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2486 |
id |
doaj-7173f1526a164383aea0258efc738ac9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7173f1526a164383aea0258efc738ac92020-11-25T02:34:37ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X1993-01-0115310.22329/il.v15i3.2486Defining the Term "Argument"P. ChittleboroughM.E. NewmanInformal logic has expanded the concept of an 'argument' beyond that presented traditionally by formal logicians-to include arguments as encountered in 'real-life'. Existent definitions of argument structure are argued to be inadequate by failing to fully recognise that, ultimately, arguments have a human source. Accordingly, a new definition is proposed which appeals to relevant cognitive and behavioural factors. The definition retains some traditional concepts, but introduces the term 'supportive' as a modification to 'premiss'. The concept of a 'persuader' is also developed. The definition is argued to capture more fully the intricacies, subtleties and rich diversity of informal arguments.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2486argumentdefinitioninformal logichuman factors |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
P. Chittleborough M.E. Newman |
spellingShingle |
P. Chittleborough M.E. Newman Defining the Term "Argument" Informal Logic argument definition informal logic human factors |
author_facet |
P. Chittleborough M.E. Newman |
author_sort |
P. Chittleborough |
title |
Defining the Term "Argument" |
title_short |
Defining the Term "Argument" |
title_full |
Defining the Term "Argument" |
title_fullStr |
Defining the Term "Argument" |
title_full_unstemmed |
Defining the Term "Argument" |
title_sort |
defining the term "argument" |
publisher |
University of Windsor |
series |
Informal Logic |
issn |
0824-2577 2293-734X |
publishDate |
1993-01-01 |
description |
Informal logic has expanded the concept of an 'argument' beyond that presented traditionally by formal logicians-to include arguments as encountered in 'real-life'. Existent definitions
of argument structure are argued to be inadequate by failing to fully recognise that, ultimately, arguments have a human source. Accordingly, a new definition is proposed which appeals to relevant cognitive and behavioural factors. The
definition retains some traditional concepts, but introduces the term 'supportive' as a modification to 'premiss'. The concept of a 'persuader' is also developed. The definition is argued to capture more fully the intricacies, subtleties and rich diversity of informal arguments. |
topic |
argument definition informal logic human factors |
url |
https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/2486 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pchittleborough definingthetermargument AT menewman definingthetermargument |
_version_ |
1724807796980973568 |