Co-Predatory Rule: International Cooperation with Respect to Cryptocurrency Taxation in Russia and Belarus

This article presents an example of how globalization and digitization force states to rely on international organization. Examining tax policy with respect to cryptocurrency—an innovative, global technology—the implication is that a state levying taxes on cryptocurrency must turn to international m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jim Mignano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Portland State University 2020-05-01
Series:Hatfield Graduate Journal of Public Affairs
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/32866
id doaj-716203903dc24a1f95b4780cd66191bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-716203903dc24a1f95b4780cd66191bc2021-06-16T00:18:47ZengPortland State UniversityHatfield Graduate Journal of Public Affairs2474-10782020-05-014110.15760/hgjpa.2020.4.1.7Co-Predatory Rule: International Cooperation with Respect to Cryptocurrency Taxation in Russia and BelarusJim Mignano0Portland State UniversityThis article presents an example of how globalization and digitization force states to rely on international organization. Examining tax policy with respect to cryptocurrency—an innovative, global technology—the implication is that a state levying taxes on cryptocurrency must turn to international monitoring and enforcement regimes to support effective taxation. Based on Margaret Levi’s theory of predatory rule, I submit a theory of “co-predation” to explain international cooperation with respect to taxation of novel, cross-border technologies such as cryptocurrency. The Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI), an anti-tax evasion framework promulgated by the OECD, serves as an example of international cooperation. A comparison of cryptocurrency taxation in Russia and Belarus finds that, where effective tax policy is at stake, states are enjoined to commit to international cooperation through AEOI. The article concludes by considering implications for legitimacy, quasi-voluntary compliance, and strategic tax policy.https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/32866GlobalizationCryptocurrencyBitcoinBlockchainTax EvasionInternational Organization
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jim Mignano
spellingShingle Jim Mignano
Co-Predatory Rule: International Cooperation with Respect to Cryptocurrency Taxation in Russia and Belarus
Hatfield Graduate Journal of Public Affairs
Globalization
Cryptocurrency
Bitcoin
Blockchain
Tax Evasion
International Organization
author_facet Jim Mignano
author_sort Jim Mignano
title Co-Predatory Rule: International Cooperation with Respect to Cryptocurrency Taxation in Russia and Belarus
title_short Co-Predatory Rule: International Cooperation with Respect to Cryptocurrency Taxation in Russia and Belarus
title_full Co-Predatory Rule: International Cooperation with Respect to Cryptocurrency Taxation in Russia and Belarus
title_fullStr Co-Predatory Rule: International Cooperation with Respect to Cryptocurrency Taxation in Russia and Belarus
title_full_unstemmed Co-Predatory Rule: International Cooperation with Respect to Cryptocurrency Taxation in Russia and Belarus
title_sort co-predatory rule: international cooperation with respect to cryptocurrency taxation in russia and belarus
publisher Portland State University
series Hatfield Graduate Journal of Public Affairs
issn 2474-1078
publishDate 2020-05-01
description This article presents an example of how globalization and digitization force states to rely on international organization. Examining tax policy with respect to cryptocurrency—an innovative, global technology—the implication is that a state levying taxes on cryptocurrency must turn to international monitoring and enforcement regimes to support effective taxation. Based on Margaret Levi’s theory of predatory rule, I submit a theory of “co-predation” to explain international cooperation with respect to taxation of novel, cross-border technologies such as cryptocurrency. The Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI), an anti-tax evasion framework promulgated by the OECD, serves as an example of international cooperation. A comparison of cryptocurrency taxation in Russia and Belarus finds that, where effective tax policy is at stake, states are enjoined to commit to international cooperation through AEOI. The article concludes by considering implications for legitimacy, quasi-voluntary compliance, and strategic tax policy.
topic Globalization
Cryptocurrency
Bitcoin
Blockchain
Tax Evasion
International Organization
url https://archives.pdx.edu/ds/psu/32866
work_keys_str_mv AT jimmignano copredatoryruleinternationalcooperationwithrespecttocryptocurrencytaxationinrussiaandbelarus
_version_ 1721375714159099904