A Comparison of Subpixel Edge Detection and Correlation Algorithms for the Measurement of Sprays

Optical diagnostic techniques are commonly used to observe the breakup of dense sprays. In order to extract quantitative data from such images, edge detection algorithms have commonly been used. However, correlation image velocimetry techniques are now also becoming available for such applications....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel Duke, Damon Honnery, Julio Soria
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-06-01
Series:International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1260/1756-8277.3.2.93
id doaj-714d3f48ae8a406888c84ce79893edff
record_format Article
spelling doaj-714d3f48ae8a406888c84ce79893edff2020-11-25T03:43:55ZengSAGE PublishingInternational Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics1756-82771756-82852011-06-01310.1260/1756-8277.3.2.9310.1260_1756-8277.3.2.93A Comparison of Subpixel Edge Detection and Correlation Algorithms for the Measurement of SpraysDaniel DukeDamon HonneryJulio SoriaOptical diagnostic techniques are commonly used to observe the breakup of dense sprays. In order to extract quantitative data from such images, edge detection algorithms have commonly been used. However, correlation image velocimetry techniques are now also becoming available for such applications. An empirical comparison between these two techniques is demonstrated for the high-speed velocimetry of the breakup of an annular air-assisted spray. A threshold based sub-pixel interpolating edge detection algorithm is employed. Both real and synthetic images are used to determine the sensitivity of the error in these techniques to changes in both image noise and defocus, the two leading causes of information loss. It is demonstrated that correlation image velocimetry techniques are generally superior in precision and accuracy as compared to edge detection techniques for the application of spray velocimetry within a reasonable parameter space of noise and defocus.https://doi.org/10.1260/1756-8277.3.2.93
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daniel Duke
Damon Honnery
Julio Soria
spellingShingle Daniel Duke
Damon Honnery
Julio Soria
A Comparison of Subpixel Edge Detection and Correlation Algorithms for the Measurement of Sprays
International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics
author_facet Daniel Duke
Damon Honnery
Julio Soria
author_sort Daniel Duke
title A Comparison of Subpixel Edge Detection and Correlation Algorithms for the Measurement of Sprays
title_short A Comparison of Subpixel Edge Detection and Correlation Algorithms for the Measurement of Sprays
title_full A Comparison of Subpixel Edge Detection and Correlation Algorithms for the Measurement of Sprays
title_fullStr A Comparison of Subpixel Edge Detection and Correlation Algorithms for the Measurement of Sprays
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Subpixel Edge Detection and Correlation Algorithms for the Measurement of Sprays
title_sort comparison of subpixel edge detection and correlation algorithms for the measurement of sprays
publisher SAGE Publishing
series International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics
issn 1756-8277
1756-8285
publishDate 2011-06-01
description Optical diagnostic techniques are commonly used to observe the breakup of dense sprays. In order to extract quantitative data from such images, edge detection algorithms have commonly been used. However, correlation image velocimetry techniques are now also becoming available for such applications. An empirical comparison between these two techniques is demonstrated for the high-speed velocimetry of the breakup of an annular air-assisted spray. A threshold based sub-pixel interpolating edge detection algorithm is employed. Both real and synthetic images are used to determine the sensitivity of the error in these techniques to changes in both image noise and defocus, the two leading causes of information loss. It is demonstrated that correlation image velocimetry techniques are generally superior in precision and accuracy as compared to edge detection techniques for the application of spray velocimetry within a reasonable parameter space of noise and defocus.
url https://doi.org/10.1260/1756-8277.3.2.93
work_keys_str_mv AT danielduke acomparisonofsubpixeledgedetectionandcorrelationalgorithmsforthemeasurementofsprays
AT damonhonnery acomparisonofsubpixeledgedetectionandcorrelationalgorithmsforthemeasurementofsprays
AT juliosoria acomparisonofsubpixeledgedetectionandcorrelationalgorithmsforthemeasurementofsprays
AT danielduke comparisonofsubpixeledgedetectionandcorrelationalgorithmsforthemeasurementofsprays
AT damonhonnery comparisonofsubpixeledgedetectionandcorrelationalgorithmsforthemeasurementofsprays
AT juliosoria comparisonofsubpixeledgedetectionandcorrelationalgorithmsforthemeasurementofsprays
_version_ 1724517412432248832