Interrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and mini-BESTest in people with increased risk of falling
Abstract Background The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) was developed to assess underlying systems for balance control in order to be able to individually tailor rehabilitation interventions to people with balance disorders. A short form, the Mini-BESTest, was developed as a screening test...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Geriatrics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-017-0480-x |
id |
doaj-7136cf4ff1db40c29b3b082a3c93f8e2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7136cf4ff1db40c29b3b082a3c93f8e22020-11-25T03:45:54ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182017-04-011711810.1186/s12877-017-0480-xInterrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and mini-BESTest in people with increased risk of fallingCharlotta Hamre0Pernille Botolfsen1Gro Gujord Tangen2Jorunn L. Helbostad3Department of Physiotherapy and Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital UllevalDepartment of Physiotherapy, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied SciencesDepartment of Health Sciences, University of OsloDepartment of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyAbstract Background The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) was developed to assess underlying systems for balance control in order to be able to individually tailor rehabilitation interventions to people with balance disorders. A short form, the Mini-BESTest, was developed as a screening test. The study aimed to assess interrater and test-retest reliability of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and the Mini-BESTest in community-dwelling people with increased risk of falling and to assess concurrent validity with the Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), and it was an observational study with a cross-sectional design. Methods Forty-two persons with increased risk of falling (elderly over 65 years of age, persons with a history of stroke or Multiple Sclerosis) were assessed twice by two raters. Relative reliability was analysed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability with standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Concurrent validity was assessed against the FES-I using Spearman’s rho. Results The BESTest showed very good interrater reliability (ICC = 0.98, SEM = 1.79, SDC95 = 5.0) and test-retest reliability (rater A/rater B = ICC = 0.89/0.89, SEM = 3.9/4.3, SDC95 = 10.8/11.8). The Mini-BESTest also showed very good interrater reliability (ICC = 0.95, SEM = 1.19, SDC95 = 3.3) and test-retest reliability (rater A/rater B = ICC = 0.85/0.84, SEM = 1.8/1.9, SDC95 = 4.9/5.2). The correlations were moderate between the FES-I and both the BESTest and the Mini-BESTest (Spearman’s rho −0.51 and-0.50, p < 0.01). Conclusion The BESTest and its short form, the Mini-BESTest, showed very good interrater and test-retest reliability when assessed in a heterogeneous sample of people with increased risk of falling. The concurrent validity measured against the FES-I showed moderate correlation. The results are comparable with earlier studies and indicate that the Norwegian versions can be used in daily clinic and in research.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-017-0480-xBalanceAssessmentReliabilityValidity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Charlotta Hamre Pernille Botolfsen Gro Gujord Tangen Jorunn L. Helbostad |
spellingShingle |
Charlotta Hamre Pernille Botolfsen Gro Gujord Tangen Jorunn L. Helbostad Interrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and mini-BESTest in people with increased risk of falling BMC Geriatrics Balance Assessment Reliability Validity |
author_facet |
Charlotta Hamre Pernille Botolfsen Gro Gujord Tangen Jorunn L. Helbostad |
author_sort |
Charlotta Hamre |
title |
Interrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and mini-BESTest in people with increased risk of falling |
title_short |
Interrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and mini-BESTest in people with increased risk of falling |
title_full |
Interrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and mini-BESTest in people with increased risk of falling |
title_fullStr |
Interrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and mini-BESTest in people with increased risk of falling |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and mini-BESTest in people with increased risk of falling |
title_sort |
interrater and test-retest reliability and validity of the norwegian version of the bestest and mini-bestest in people with increased risk of falling |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Geriatrics |
issn |
1471-2318 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) was developed to assess underlying systems for balance control in order to be able to individually tailor rehabilitation interventions to people with balance disorders. A short form, the Mini-BESTest, was developed as a screening test. The study aimed to assess interrater and test-retest reliability of the Norwegian version of the BESTest and the Mini-BESTest in community-dwelling people with increased risk of falling and to assess concurrent validity with the Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I), and it was an observational study with a cross-sectional design. Methods Forty-two persons with increased risk of falling (elderly over 65 years of age, persons with a history of stroke or Multiple Sclerosis) were assessed twice by two raters. Relative reliability was analysed with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), and absolute reliability with standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Concurrent validity was assessed against the FES-I using Spearman’s rho. Results The BESTest showed very good interrater reliability (ICC = 0.98, SEM = 1.79, SDC95 = 5.0) and test-retest reliability (rater A/rater B = ICC = 0.89/0.89, SEM = 3.9/4.3, SDC95 = 10.8/11.8). The Mini-BESTest also showed very good interrater reliability (ICC = 0.95, SEM = 1.19, SDC95 = 3.3) and test-retest reliability (rater A/rater B = ICC = 0.85/0.84, SEM = 1.8/1.9, SDC95 = 4.9/5.2). The correlations were moderate between the FES-I and both the BESTest and the Mini-BESTest (Spearman’s rho −0.51 and-0.50, p < 0.01). Conclusion The BESTest and its short form, the Mini-BESTest, showed very good interrater and test-retest reliability when assessed in a heterogeneous sample of people with increased risk of falling. The concurrent validity measured against the FES-I showed moderate correlation. The results are comparable with earlier studies and indicate that the Norwegian versions can be used in daily clinic and in research. |
topic |
Balance Assessment Reliability Validity |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-017-0480-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT charlottahamre interraterandtestretestreliabilityandvalidityofthenorwegianversionofthebestestandminibestestinpeoplewithincreasedriskoffalling AT pernillebotolfsen interraterandtestretestreliabilityandvalidityofthenorwegianversionofthebestestandminibestestinpeoplewithincreasedriskoffalling AT grogujordtangen interraterandtestretestreliabilityandvalidityofthenorwegianversionofthebestestandminibestestinpeoplewithincreasedriskoffalling AT jorunnlhelbostad interraterandtestretestreliabilityandvalidityofthenorwegianversionofthebestestandminibestestinpeoplewithincreasedriskoffalling |
_version_ |
1724509070119927808 |