Effects of different sport surfaces on muscle performance

The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of different sport surfaces on athletic performance by means of muscle performance. Twenty two elite male basketball players, aged between 17 and 28, participated in this study. This study was executed on 7 different sport surfaces: asphalt, sy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D Katkat, Y Bulut, M Demir, S Akar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Termedia Publishing House 2009-09-01
Series:Biology of Sport
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/fulltxt.php?ICID=894793
id doaj-71233dddd99a44c98080586c18ebc5f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71233dddd99a44c98080586c18ebc5f62020-11-24T23:41:20ZengTermedia Publishing HouseBiology of Sport0860-021X2009-09-01263285296Effects of different sport surfaces on muscle performanceD KatkatY BulutM DemirS AkarThe aim of the present study was to examine the effects of different sport surfaces on athletic performance by means of muscle performance. Twenty two elite male basketball players, aged between 17 and 28, participated in this study. This study was executed on 7 different sport surfaces: asphalt, synthetic grass, natural grass, tile powder, soil, wooden parquet and EPDM (Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer). Leg strength (LS) and vertical jumping height (VJH) were measured at rest and after a given training protocol on each surface. Surface compliance was evaluated with a drop test using a medicine ball. Asphalt and synthetic grass were the most fatiguing, natural grass, soil and tile powder were moderately fatiguing, parquet and EPDM were the least fatiguing surfaces. The results of surface compliance were inconsistent with those obtained in LS and VJH tests. As the compliance of the surface increased LS and VJH increased, i.e. performance was decreased. The results of the present study suggest that it is better to use parquet and EPDM in construction of indoor sport surfaces. On the other hand, it may be appropriate to build outdoor surfaces with natural grass because of its aesthetic and visual impacts and its contribution to the amount of urban green area. http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/fulltxt.php?ICID=894793Sport surfacesmuscle performanceSynthetic grass
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D Katkat
Y Bulut
M Demir
S Akar
spellingShingle D Katkat
Y Bulut
M Demir
S Akar
Effects of different sport surfaces on muscle performance
Biology of Sport
Sport surfaces
muscle performance
Synthetic grass
author_facet D Katkat
Y Bulut
M Demir
S Akar
author_sort D Katkat
title Effects of different sport surfaces on muscle performance
title_short Effects of different sport surfaces on muscle performance
title_full Effects of different sport surfaces on muscle performance
title_fullStr Effects of different sport surfaces on muscle performance
title_full_unstemmed Effects of different sport surfaces on muscle performance
title_sort effects of different sport surfaces on muscle performance
publisher Termedia Publishing House
series Biology of Sport
issn 0860-021X
publishDate 2009-09-01
description The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of different sport surfaces on athletic performance by means of muscle performance. Twenty two elite male basketball players, aged between 17 and 28, participated in this study. This study was executed on 7 different sport surfaces: asphalt, synthetic grass, natural grass, tile powder, soil, wooden parquet and EPDM (Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer). Leg strength (LS) and vertical jumping height (VJH) were measured at rest and after a given training protocol on each surface. Surface compliance was evaluated with a drop test using a medicine ball. Asphalt and synthetic grass were the most fatiguing, natural grass, soil and tile powder were moderately fatiguing, parquet and EPDM were the least fatiguing surfaces. The results of surface compliance were inconsistent with those obtained in LS and VJH tests. As the compliance of the surface increased LS and VJH increased, i.e. performance was decreased. The results of the present study suggest that it is better to use parquet and EPDM in construction of indoor sport surfaces. On the other hand, it may be appropriate to build outdoor surfaces with natural grass because of its aesthetic and visual impacts and its contribution to the amount of urban green area.
topic Sport surfaces
muscle performance
Synthetic grass
url http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/fulltxt.php?ICID=894793
work_keys_str_mv AT dkatkat effectsofdifferentsportsurfacesonmuscleperformance
AT ybulut effectsofdifferentsportsurfacesonmuscleperformance
AT mdemir effectsofdifferentsportsurfacesonmuscleperformance
AT sakar effectsofdifferentsportsurfacesonmuscleperformance
_version_ 1725507876917608448