Non-Surgical Cancer Risk Reduction in <i>BRCA1 </i>Mutation Carriers: Disabling the Remote Control

Women-specific cancers are a major health issue, particularly those associated with the <i>BRCA</i><i>1</i> germline mutation carrier state, which include triple-negative basal breast carcinomas and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (referred to as extra-uterine M&#252...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Widschwendter, Louis Dubeau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-02-01
Series:Cancers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/3/547
id doaj-7116f139db994709a985e3d06c72751c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7116f139db994709a985e3d06c72751c2020-11-25T01:19:53ZengMDPI AGCancers2072-66942020-02-0112354710.3390/cancers12030547cancers12030547Non-Surgical Cancer Risk Reduction in <i>BRCA1 </i>Mutation Carriers: Disabling the Remote ControlMartin Widschwendter0Louis Dubeau1Department of Women’s Cancer, University College London, 74 Huntley Street, London WC1E 6AU, UKDepartment of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USAWomen-specific cancers are a major health issue, particularly those associated with the <i>BRCA</i><i>1</i> germline mutation carrier state, which include triple-negative basal breast carcinomas and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (referred to as extra-uterine M&#252;llerian carcinomas). Whereas many chronic diseases can currently be prevented (e.g., cardiovascular diseases), no recent tangible progress was made in cancer prevention of <i>BRCA1</i> mutation carriers apart from surgical resections of at-risk organs. This lack of progress is largely due to (1) poor understanding of the initiating events triggered by known risk factors in the development of these cancers, (2) the fact that current preventive measures rely on evidence obtained from adjuvant breast cancer treatment that fail to protect against poor prognostic cancers, and (3) problems with using cancer incidence in high-risk women as an ethically justifiable endpoint in cancer prevention trials. Here, we propose that cancer predisposition in BRCA1 mutation carriers is driven, at least in part, by cell-nonautonomous mechanisms (i.e., driven by consequences of this carrier state on hormonal and other systemic factors controlled in organs other than those that are cancer-prone) and that biomarkers of epigenomic reprogramming, hypothesized to be a direct consequence of such cell-nonautonomous mechanisms, are attractive as intermediate surrogate endpoints to assess the efficacy of cancer risk-reducing strategies targeting these mechanisms.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/3/547brca1 mutationsovarian cancerbreast cancerprevention
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Widschwendter
Louis Dubeau
spellingShingle Martin Widschwendter
Louis Dubeau
Non-Surgical Cancer Risk Reduction in <i>BRCA1 </i>Mutation Carriers: Disabling the Remote Control
Cancers
brca1 mutations
ovarian cancer
breast cancer
prevention
author_facet Martin Widschwendter
Louis Dubeau
author_sort Martin Widschwendter
title Non-Surgical Cancer Risk Reduction in <i>BRCA1 </i>Mutation Carriers: Disabling the Remote Control
title_short Non-Surgical Cancer Risk Reduction in <i>BRCA1 </i>Mutation Carriers: Disabling the Remote Control
title_full Non-Surgical Cancer Risk Reduction in <i>BRCA1 </i>Mutation Carriers: Disabling the Remote Control
title_fullStr Non-Surgical Cancer Risk Reduction in <i>BRCA1 </i>Mutation Carriers: Disabling the Remote Control
title_full_unstemmed Non-Surgical Cancer Risk Reduction in <i>BRCA1 </i>Mutation Carriers: Disabling the Remote Control
title_sort non-surgical cancer risk reduction in <i>brca1 </i>mutation carriers: disabling the remote control
publisher MDPI AG
series Cancers
issn 2072-6694
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Women-specific cancers are a major health issue, particularly those associated with the <i>BRCA</i><i>1</i> germline mutation carrier state, which include triple-negative basal breast carcinomas and high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas (referred to as extra-uterine M&#252;llerian carcinomas). Whereas many chronic diseases can currently be prevented (e.g., cardiovascular diseases), no recent tangible progress was made in cancer prevention of <i>BRCA1</i> mutation carriers apart from surgical resections of at-risk organs. This lack of progress is largely due to (1) poor understanding of the initiating events triggered by known risk factors in the development of these cancers, (2) the fact that current preventive measures rely on evidence obtained from adjuvant breast cancer treatment that fail to protect against poor prognostic cancers, and (3) problems with using cancer incidence in high-risk women as an ethically justifiable endpoint in cancer prevention trials. Here, we propose that cancer predisposition in BRCA1 mutation carriers is driven, at least in part, by cell-nonautonomous mechanisms (i.e., driven by consequences of this carrier state on hormonal and other systemic factors controlled in organs other than those that are cancer-prone) and that biomarkers of epigenomic reprogramming, hypothesized to be a direct consequence of such cell-nonautonomous mechanisms, are attractive as intermediate surrogate endpoints to assess the efficacy of cancer risk-reducing strategies targeting these mechanisms.
topic brca1 mutations
ovarian cancer
breast cancer
prevention
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/12/3/547
work_keys_str_mv AT martinwidschwendter nonsurgicalcancerriskreductioninibrca1imutationcarriersdisablingtheremotecontrol
AT louisdubeau nonsurgicalcancerriskreductioninibrca1imutationcarriersdisablingtheremotecontrol
_version_ 1725136659568132096