Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?

Background and Aim: Defining a new screwing method for C7 posterior stabilization in case of a cervical rib existence aimed in this report. Materials and Methods: Ten adult patients, five of which without cervical rib (Group 1) and the other five of which (Group 2) with cervical rib that has been ch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sait Ozturk, Hanefi Yildirim, Metin Kaplan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2016;volume=7;issue=4;spage=201;epage=203;aulast=Ozturk
id doaj-711229d9502e4baab11a0e0428038080
record_format Article
spelling doaj-711229d9502e4baab11a0e04280380802020-11-24T22:02:21ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine0974-82372016-01-017420120310.4103/0974-8237.193269Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?Sait OzturkHanefi YildirimMetin KaplanBackground and Aim: Defining a new screwing method for C7 posterior stabilization in case of a cervical rib existence aimed in this report. Materials and Methods: Ten adult patients, five of which without cervical rib (Group 1) and the other five of which (Group 2) with cervical rib that has been chosen from the radiology archive. Axial, sagittal, coronal sections of cervical computed tomography and three dimensional images were obtained. Lateral mass sizes of all cases were measured and compared between two groups. The relationship between cervical rib and lateral mass was identified in Group 2. Results: The mean length, width, and height of lateral masses were measured respectively, as 5.4, 17.6, and 12.7 mm in Group 1. The measurement of Group 2 (with cervical rib) revealed the mean length of 20.7, the width of 20.4, and the height of 15.9 mm. When both groups were compared, there were no significant differences between the width and height of the lateral masses. However, axial measurements of Group 2 revealed a remarkable and significant length for screwing. Conclusion: In patients with cervical rib, directing lateral mass screw toward cervical rib conjoint can present a simple and reliable alternative method in C7 posterior stabilization process.http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2016;volume=7;issue=4;spage=201;epage=203;aulast=OzturkC7; cervical rib; posterior stabilization; screwing.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sait Ozturk
Hanefi Yildirim
Metin Kaplan
spellingShingle Sait Ozturk
Hanefi Yildirim
Metin Kaplan
Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?
Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
C7; cervical rib; posterior stabilization; screwing.
author_facet Sait Ozturk
Hanefi Yildirim
Metin Kaplan
author_sort Sait Ozturk
title Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?
title_short Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?
title_full Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?
title_fullStr Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?
title_full_unstemmed Is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for C7 posterior stabilization?
title_sort is the existence of cervical rib an advantage for c7 posterior stabilization?
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine
issn 0974-8237
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Background and Aim: Defining a new screwing method for C7 posterior stabilization in case of a cervical rib existence aimed in this report. Materials and Methods: Ten adult patients, five of which without cervical rib (Group 1) and the other five of which (Group 2) with cervical rib that has been chosen from the radiology archive. Axial, sagittal, coronal sections of cervical computed tomography and three dimensional images were obtained. Lateral mass sizes of all cases were measured and compared between two groups. The relationship between cervical rib and lateral mass was identified in Group 2. Results: The mean length, width, and height of lateral masses were measured respectively, as 5.4, 17.6, and 12.7 mm in Group 1. The measurement of Group 2 (with cervical rib) revealed the mean length of 20.7, the width of 20.4, and the height of 15.9 mm. When both groups were compared, there were no significant differences between the width and height of the lateral masses. However, axial measurements of Group 2 revealed a remarkable and significant length for screwing. Conclusion: In patients with cervical rib, directing lateral mass screw toward cervical rib conjoint can present a simple and reliable alternative method in C7 posterior stabilization process.
topic C7; cervical rib; posterior stabilization; screwing.
url http://www.jcvjs.com/article.asp?issn=0974-8237;year=2016;volume=7;issue=4;spage=201;epage=203;aulast=Ozturk
work_keys_str_mv AT saitozturk istheexistenceofcervicalribanadvantageforc7posteriorstabilization
AT hanefiyildirim istheexistenceofcervicalribanadvantageforc7posteriorstabilization
AT metinkaplan istheexistenceofcervicalribanadvantageforc7posteriorstabilization
_version_ 1725836291601334272