Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.
Recent advances in probabilistic pragmatics have achieved considerable success in modeling speakers' and listeners' pragmatic reasoning as probabilistic inference. However, these models are usually applied to population-level data, and so implicitly suggest a homogeneous population without...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2016-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4858259?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-70e8eaced09b416d9a3ef3c35fe5a54c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-70e8eaced09b416d9a3ef3c35fe5a54c2020-11-25T02:40:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01115e015485410.1371/journal.pone.0154854Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.Michael FrankeJudith DegenRecent advances in probabilistic pragmatics have achieved considerable success in modeling speakers' and listeners' pragmatic reasoning as probabilistic inference. However, these models are usually applied to population-level data, and so implicitly suggest a homogeneous population without individual differences. Here we investigate potential individual differences in Theory-of-Mind related depth of pragmatic reasoning in so-called reference games that require drawing ad hoc Quantity implicatures of varying complexity. We show by Bayesian model comparison that a model that assumes a heterogenous population is a better predictor of our data, especially for comprehension. We discuss the implications for the treatment of individual differences in probabilistic models of language use.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4858259?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Michael Franke Judith Degen |
spellingShingle |
Michael Franke Judith Degen Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Michael Franke Judith Degen |
author_sort |
Michael Franke |
title |
Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling. |
title_short |
Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling. |
title_full |
Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling. |
title_fullStr |
Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling. |
title_sort |
reasoning in reference games: individual- vs. population-level probabilistic modeling. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2016-01-01 |
description |
Recent advances in probabilistic pragmatics have achieved considerable success in modeling speakers' and listeners' pragmatic reasoning as probabilistic inference. However, these models are usually applied to population-level data, and so implicitly suggest a homogeneous population without individual differences. Here we investigate potential individual differences in Theory-of-Mind related depth of pragmatic reasoning in so-called reference games that require drawing ad hoc Quantity implicatures of varying complexity. We show by Bayesian model comparison that a model that assumes a heterogenous population is a better predictor of our data, especially for comprehension. We discuss the implications for the treatment of individual differences in probabilistic models of language use. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4858259?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT michaelfranke reasoninginreferencegamesindividualvspopulationlevelprobabilisticmodeling AT judithdegen reasoninginreferencegamesindividualvspopulationlevelprobabilisticmodeling |
_version_ |
1724783571426607104 |