Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.

Recent advances in probabilistic pragmatics have achieved considerable success in modeling speakers' and listeners' pragmatic reasoning as probabilistic inference. However, these models are usually applied to population-level data, and so implicitly suggest a homogeneous population without...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Franke, Judith Degen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4858259?pdf=render
id doaj-70e8eaced09b416d9a3ef3c35fe5a54c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70e8eaced09b416d9a3ef3c35fe5a54c2020-11-25T02:40:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01115e015485410.1371/journal.pone.0154854Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.Michael FrankeJudith DegenRecent advances in probabilistic pragmatics have achieved considerable success in modeling speakers' and listeners' pragmatic reasoning as probabilistic inference. However, these models are usually applied to population-level data, and so implicitly suggest a homogeneous population without individual differences. Here we investigate potential individual differences in Theory-of-Mind related depth of pragmatic reasoning in so-called reference games that require drawing ad hoc Quantity implicatures of varying complexity. We show by Bayesian model comparison that a model that assumes a heterogenous population is a better predictor of our data, especially for comprehension. We discuss the implications for the treatment of individual differences in probabilistic models of language use.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4858259?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Franke
Judith Degen
spellingShingle Michael Franke
Judith Degen
Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Michael Franke
Judith Degen
author_sort Michael Franke
title Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.
title_short Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.
title_full Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.
title_fullStr Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.
title_full_unstemmed Reasoning in Reference Games: Individual- vs. Population-Level Probabilistic Modeling.
title_sort reasoning in reference games: individual- vs. population-level probabilistic modeling.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Recent advances in probabilistic pragmatics have achieved considerable success in modeling speakers' and listeners' pragmatic reasoning as probabilistic inference. However, these models are usually applied to population-level data, and so implicitly suggest a homogeneous population without individual differences. Here we investigate potential individual differences in Theory-of-Mind related depth of pragmatic reasoning in so-called reference games that require drawing ad hoc Quantity implicatures of varying complexity. We show by Bayesian model comparison that a model that assumes a heterogenous population is a better predictor of our data, especially for comprehension. We discuss the implications for the treatment of individual differences in probabilistic models of language use.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4858259?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelfranke reasoninginreferencegamesindividualvspopulationlevelprobabilisticmodeling
AT judithdegen reasoninginreferencegamesindividualvspopulationlevelprobabilisticmodeling
_version_ 1724783571426607104