Endogeneity and Specialization in the European Monetary Union

There has been a broad discussion about the viability of the European Monetary Union (EMU) in its present and prospective confines. Generally, the EMU, consisting of 19 countries, is not considered an optimal currency area due to low labor market flexibility, autonomous fiscal policies, and structur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bąk Henryk, Maciejewski Sebastian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2015-06-01
Series:International Journal of Management and Economics
Subjects:
emu
e32
f13
f36
f4
l6
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2015-0020
id doaj-70df6729701340f384bf3b19e27b6926
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70df6729701340f384bf3b19e27b69262021-09-05T20:51:08ZengSciendoInternational Journal of Management and Economics2299-97012015-06-0146174010.1515/ijme-2015-0020ijme-2015-0020Endogeneity and Specialization in the European Monetary UnionBąk Henryk0Maciejewski Sebastian1Warsaw School of Economics, PolandPGE Group, Warsaw, PolandThere has been a broad discussion about the viability of the European Monetary Union (EMU) in its present and prospective confines. Generally, the EMU, consisting of 19 countries, is not considered an optimal currency area due to low labor market flexibility, autonomous fiscal policies, and structural differences among its members. Considerations about the endogeneity effect of currency unions lead to the question whether the EMU will become more viable over time. According to the endogenity hypothesis formulated by Frankel and Rose [1996, 2000], a common currency area may gradually become an optimal currency area at some future point (ex post unification), despite not having been an optimal currency area (OCA) prior to (ex ante) currency unification. Currency unification should bring about increased intra-industry trade and greater business cycle synchronization among member states. The most recent literature and analyses presented in this paper suggest that the endogenity effect in the EMU has been frail since its onset. While real convergence between EMU member states has not advanced, divergence in i.a. economic structures, national income and productivity levels is observed. The most important economic mechanisms reinforcing convergence and divergence among monetary union members are presented in this paper. Using recent data and related research results, we show a significant divergence in economic structures, business cycle synchronization and productivity levels among Eurozone members in the last decade. The Krugman sectorial dissimilarity index is applied to measure changes in industrial similarity among member countries and the Hodrick-Prescott filter to estimate business cycle synchronization in the EMU. These divergence tendencies have been strengthened by the global financial crisis of 2008 and persist, calling for reforms and new policies within the EMU.https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2015-0020emuoptimal currency areaendogeneityintra-industry tradeindustrial specializationbusiness cyclese32f13f36f4l6
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bąk Henryk
Maciejewski Sebastian
spellingShingle Bąk Henryk
Maciejewski Sebastian
Endogeneity and Specialization in the European Monetary Union
International Journal of Management and Economics
emu
optimal currency area
endogeneity
intra-industry trade
industrial specialization
business cycles
e32
f13
f36
f4
l6
author_facet Bąk Henryk
Maciejewski Sebastian
author_sort Bąk Henryk
title Endogeneity and Specialization in the European Monetary Union
title_short Endogeneity and Specialization in the European Monetary Union
title_full Endogeneity and Specialization in the European Monetary Union
title_fullStr Endogeneity and Specialization in the European Monetary Union
title_full_unstemmed Endogeneity and Specialization in the European Monetary Union
title_sort endogeneity and specialization in the european monetary union
publisher Sciendo
series International Journal of Management and Economics
issn 2299-9701
publishDate 2015-06-01
description There has been a broad discussion about the viability of the European Monetary Union (EMU) in its present and prospective confines. Generally, the EMU, consisting of 19 countries, is not considered an optimal currency area due to low labor market flexibility, autonomous fiscal policies, and structural differences among its members. Considerations about the endogeneity effect of currency unions lead to the question whether the EMU will become more viable over time. According to the endogenity hypothesis formulated by Frankel and Rose [1996, 2000], a common currency area may gradually become an optimal currency area at some future point (ex post unification), despite not having been an optimal currency area (OCA) prior to (ex ante) currency unification. Currency unification should bring about increased intra-industry trade and greater business cycle synchronization among member states. The most recent literature and analyses presented in this paper suggest that the endogenity effect in the EMU has been frail since its onset. While real convergence between EMU member states has not advanced, divergence in i.a. economic structures, national income and productivity levels is observed. The most important economic mechanisms reinforcing convergence and divergence among monetary union members are presented in this paper. Using recent data and related research results, we show a significant divergence in economic structures, business cycle synchronization and productivity levels among Eurozone members in the last decade. The Krugman sectorial dissimilarity index is applied to measure changes in industrial similarity among member countries and the Hodrick-Prescott filter to estimate business cycle synchronization in the EMU. These divergence tendencies have been strengthened by the global financial crisis of 2008 and persist, calling for reforms and new policies within the EMU.
topic emu
optimal currency area
endogeneity
intra-industry trade
industrial specialization
business cycles
e32
f13
f36
f4
l6
url https://doi.org/10.1515/ijme-2015-0020
work_keys_str_mv AT bakhenryk endogeneityandspecializationintheeuropeanmonetaryunion
AT maciejewskisebastian endogeneityandspecializationintheeuropeanmonetaryunion
_version_ 1717784194256470016