Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review
BackgroundEye-tracking technology has been used to measure human cognitive processes and has the potential to improve the usability of health information technology (HIT). However, it is still unclear how the eye-tracking method can be integrated with other traditional usabil...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JMIR Publications
2015-04-01
|
Series: | JMIR Human Factors |
Online Access: | http://humanfactors.jmir.org/2015/1/e5/ |
id |
doaj-70de61f12d1c4524858b3924493129dc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-70de61f12d1c4524858b3924493129dc2021-05-03T01:42:19ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Human Factors2292-94952015-04-0121e510.2196/humanfactors.4062Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature ReviewAsan, OnurYang, Yushi BackgroundEye-tracking technology has been used to measure human cognitive processes and has the potential to improve the usability of health information technology (HIT). However, it is still unclear how the eye-tracking method can be integrated with other traditional usability methodologies to achieve its full potential. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to report on HIT evaluation studies that have used eye-tracker technology, and to envision the potential use of eye-tracking technology in future research. MethodsWe used four reference databases to initially identify 5248 related papers, which resulted in only 9 articles that met our inclusion criteria. ResultsEye-tracking technology was useful in finding usability problems in many ways, but is still in its infancy for HIT usability evaluation. Limited types of HITs have been evaluated by eye trackers, and there has been a lack of evaluation research in natural settings. ConclusionsMore research should be done in natural settings to discover the real contextual-based usability problems of clinical and mobile HITs using eye-tracking technology with more standardized methodologies and guidance.http://humanfactors.jmir.org/2015/1/e5/ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Asan, Onur Yang, Yushi |
spellingShingle |
Asan, Onur Yang, Yushi Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review JMIR Human Factors |
author_facet |
Asan, Onur Yang, Yushi |
author_sort |
Asan, Onur |
title |
Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_short |
Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full |
Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_fullStr |
Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review |
title_sort |
using eye trackers for usability evaluation of health information technology: a systematic literature review |
publisher |
JMIR Publications |
series |
JMIR Human Factors |
issn |
2292-9495 |
publishDate |
2015-04-01 |
description |
BackgroundEye-tracking technology has been used to measure human cognitive processes and has the potential to improve the usability of health information technology (HIT). However, it is still unclear how the eye-tracking method can be integrated with other traditional usability methodologies to achieve its full potential.
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to report on HIT evaluation studies that have used eye-tracker technology, and to envision the potential use of eye-tracking technology in future research.
MethodsWe used four reference databases to initially identify 5248 related papers, which resulted in only 9 articles that met our inclusion criteria.
ResultsEye-tracking technology was useful in finding usability problems in many ways, but is still in its infancy for HIT usability evaluation. Limited types of HITs have been evaluated by eye trackers, and there has been a lack of evaluation research in natural settings.
ConclusionsMore research should be done in natural settings to discover the real contextual-based usability problems of clinical and mobile HITs using eye-tracking technology with more standardized methodologies and guidance. |
url |
http://humanfactors.jmir.org/2015/1/e5/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT asanonur usingeyetrackersforusabilityevaluationofhealthinformationtechnologyasystematicliteraturereview AT yangyushi usingeyetrackersforusabilityevaluationofhealthinformationtechnologyasystematicliteraturereview |
_version_ |
1721485696648085504 |