Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review

BackgroundEye-tracking technology has been used to measure human cognitive processes and has the potential to improve the usability of health information technology (HIT). However, it is still unclear how the eye-tracking method can be integrated with other traditional usabil...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Asan, Onur, Yang, Yushi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2015-04-01
Series:JMIR Human Factors
Online Access:http://humanfactors.jmir.org/2015/1/e5/
id doaj-70de61f12d1c4524858b3924493129dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70de61f12d1c4524858b3924493129dc2021-05-03T01:42:19ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Human Factors2292-94952015-04-0121e510.2196/humanfactors.4062Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature ReviewAsan, OnurYang, Yushi BackgroundEye-tracking technology has been used to measure human cognitive processes and has the potential to improve the usability of health information technology (HIT). However, it is still unclear how the eye-tracking method can be integrated with other traditional usability methodologies to achieve its full potential. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to report on HIT evaluation studies that have used eye-tracker technology, and to envision the potential use of eye-tracking technology in future research. MethodsWe used four reference databases to initially identify 5248 related papers, which resulted in only 9 articles that met our inclusion criteria. ResultsEye-tracking technology was useful in finding usability problems in many ways, but is still in its infancy for HIT usability evaluation. Limited types of HITs have been evaluated by eye trackers, and there has been a lack of evaluation research in natural settings. ConclusionsMore research should be done in natural settings to discover the real contextual-based usability problems of clinical and mobile HITs using eye-tracking technology with more standardized methodologies and guidance.http://humanfactors.jmir.org/2015/1/e5/
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Asan, Onur
Yang, Yushi
spellingShingle Asan, Onur
Yang, Yushi
Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review
JMIR Human Factors
author_facet Asan, Onur
Yang, Yushi
author_sort Asan, Onur
title Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review
title_short Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review
title_fullStr Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review
title_full_unstemmed Using Eye Trackers for Usability Evaluation of Health Information Technology: A Systematic Literature Review
title_sort using eye trackers for usability evaluation of health information technology: a systematic literature review
publisher JMIR Publications
series JMIR Human Factors
issn 2292-9495
publishDate 2015-04-01
description BackgroundEye-tracking technology has been used to measure human cognitive processes and has the potential to improve the usability of health information technology (HIT). However, it is still unclear how the eye-tracking method can be integrated with other traditional usability methodologies to achieve its full potential. ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to report on HIT evaluation studies that have used eye-tracker technology, and to envision the potential use of eye-tracking technology in future research. MethodsWe used four reference databases to initially identify 5248 related papers, which resulted in only 9 articles that met our inclusion criteria. ResultsEye-tracking technology was useful in finding usability problems in many ways, but is still in its infancy for HIT usability evaluation. Limited types of HITs have been evaluated by eye trackers, and there has been a lack of evaluation research in natural settings. ConclusionsMore research should be done in natural settings to discover the real contextual-based usability problems of clinical and mobile HITs using eye-tracking technology with more standardized methodologies and guidance.
url http://humanfactors.jmir.org/2015/1/e5/
work_keys_str_mv AT asanonur usingeyetrackersforusabilityevaluationofhealthinformationtechnologyasystematicliteraturereview
AT yangyushi usingeyetrackersforusabilityevaluationofhealthinformationtechnologyasystematicliteraturereview
_version_ 1721485696648085504