Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis

A critical aspect of analysing an archaeological site is identifying the network of relationships between the things we find and the locations where we find them. These associations are typically determined by a combination of quantitative analyses and the professional knowledge and intuition of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J. Scott Cardinal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ubiquity Press 2019-04-01
Series:Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.caa-international.org/articles/16
id doaj-70ce1f25fe97488d9e8372ff7b25fed4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70ce1f25fe97488d9e8372ff7b25fed42020-11-24T20:47:30ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Computer Applications in Archaeology2514-83622019-04-012110.5334/jcaa.1617Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site AnalysisJ. Scott Cardinal0New York State MuseumA critical aspect of analysing an archaeological site is identifying the network of relationships between the things we find and the locations where we find them. These associations are typically determined by a combination of quantitative analyses and the professional knowledge and intuition of the archaeologist, but where exactly is the boundary between what is truly empirical field data and what is inferred through our prior knowledge and field methods? How can we best support those inferences? This paper is a critical evaluation of that boundary to firmly ground, as much as possible, a quantitative analysis on only that which we can directly observe – the thing and its location – and derive associations from that basis alone. To do so, the approach described here relies on a combination of set and graph theories rather than statistical or spatial methods. This revised ontology allows a formalization, in combinatorial terms, for describing an underlying structure to contexts and assemblages that suggests a clear association between archaeological site analysis and a well-studied class of set and graph covering problems. This, in turn, points towards potential algorithmic solutions for a more holistic parsing of the total relationships between sites, contexts, assemblages, proveniences, and artefacts.https://journal.caa-international.org/articles/16ontologyarchaeological theoryquantitative analysisgraph theoryset theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J. Scott Cardinal
spellingShingle J. Scott Cardinal
Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis
Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
ontology
archaeological theory
quantitative analysis
graph theory
set theory
author_facet J. Scott Cardinal
author_sort J. Scott Cardinal
title Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis
title_short Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis
title_full Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis
title_fullStr Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis
title_sort sets, graphs, and things we can see: a formal combinatorial ontology for empirical intra-site analysis
publisher Ubiquity Press
series Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology
issn 2514-8362
publishDate 2019-04-01
description A critical aspect of analysing an archaeological site is identifying the network of relationships between the things we find and the locations where we find them. These associations are typically determined by a combination of quantitative analyses and the professional knowledge and intuition of the archaeologist, but where exactly is the boundary between what is truly empirical field data and what is inferred through our prior knowledge and field methods? How can we best support those inferences? This paper is a critical evaluation of that boundary to firmly ground, as much as possible, a quantitative analysis on only that which we can directly observe – the thing and its location – and derive associations from that basis alone. To do so, the approach described here relies on a combination of set and graph theories rather than statistical or spatial methods. This revised ontology allows a formalization, in combinatorial terms, for describing an underlying structure to contexts and assemblages that suggests a clear association between archaeological site analysis and a well-studied class of set and graph covering problems. This, in turn, points towards potential algorithmic solutions for a more holistic parsing of the total relationships between sites, contexts, assemblages, proveniences, and artefacts.
topic ontology
archaeological theory
quantitative analysis
graph theory
set theory
url https://journal.caa-international.org/articles/16
work_keys_str_mv AT jscottcardinal setsgraphsandthingswecanseeaformalcombinatorialontologyforempiricalintrasiteanalysis
_version_ 1716809829259935744