Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis
A critical aspect of analysing an archaeological site is identifying the network of relationships between the things we find and the locations where we find them. These associations are typically determined by a combination of quantitative analyses and the professional knowledge and intuition of the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Ubiquity Press
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.caa-international.org/articles/16 |
id |
doaj-70ce1f25fe97488d9e8372ff7b25fed4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-70ce1f25fe97488d9e8372ff7b25fed42020-11-24T20:47:30ZengUbiquity PressJournal of Computer Applications in Archaeology2514-83622019-04-012110.5334/jcaa.1617Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site AnalysisJ. Scott Cardinal0New York State MuseumA critical aspect of analysing an archaeological site is identifying the network of relationships between the things we find and the locations where we find them. These associations are typically determined by a combination of quantitative analyses and the professional knowledge and intuition of the archaeologist, but where exactly is the boundary between what is truly empirical field data and what is inferred through our prior knowledge and field methods? How can we best support those inferences? This paper is a critical evaluation of that boundary to firmly ground, as much as possible, a quantitative analysis on only that which we can directly observe – the thing and its location – and derive associations from that basis alone. To do so, the approach described here relies on a combination of set and graph theories rather than statistical or spatial methods. This revised ontology allows a formalization, in combinatorial terms, for describing an underlying structure to contexts and assemblages that suggests a clear association between archaeological site analysis and a well-studied class of set and graph covering problems. This, in turn, points towards potential algorithmic solutions for a more holistic parsing of the total relationships between sites, contexts, assemblages, proveniences, and artefacts.https://journal.caa-international.org/articles/16ontologyarchaeological theoryquantitative analysisgraph theoryset theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J. Scott Cardinal |
spellingShingle |
J. Scott Cardinal Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology ontology archaeological theory quantitative analysis graph theory set theory |
author_facet |
J. Scott Cardinal |
author_sort |
J. Scott Cardinal |
title |
Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis |
title_short |
Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis |
title_full |
Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sets, Graphs, and Things We Can See: A Formal Combinatorial Ontology for Empirical Intra-Site Analysis |
title_sort |
sets, graphs, and things we can see: a formal combinatorial ontology for empirical intra-site analysis |
publisher |
Ubiquity Press |
series |
Journal of Computer Applications in Archaeology |
issn |
2514-8362 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
A critical aspect of analysing an archaeological site is identifying the network of relationships between the things we find and the locations where we find them. These associations are typically determined by a combination of quantitative analyses and the professional knowledge and intuition of the archaeologist, but where exactly is the boundary between what is truly empirical field data and what is inferred through our prior knowledge and field methods? How can we best support those inferences? This paper is a critical evaluation of that boundary to firmly ground, as much as possible, a quantitative analysis on only that which we can directly observe – the thing and its location – and derive associations from that basis alone. To do so, the approach described here relies on a combination of set and graph theories rather than statistical or spatial methods. This revised ontology allows a formalization, in combinatorial terms, for describing an underlying structure to contexts and assemblages that suggests a clear association between archaeological site analysis and a well-studied class of set and graph covering problems. This, in turn, points towards potential algorithmic solutions for a more holistic parsing of the total relationships between sites, contexts, assemblages, proveniences, and artefacts. |
topic |
ontology archaeological theory quantitative analysis graph theory set theory |
url |
https://journal.caa-international.org/articles/16 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jscottcardinal setsgraphsandthingswecanseeaformalcombinatorialontologyforempiricalintrasiteanalysis |
_version_ |
1716809829259935744 |