Andries van Aarde’s Matthew Interpretation

This article focused on Andries van Aarde’s interpretation of the Gospel of Matthew. It argues that Van Aarde has changed his approach to Matthew in the course of time. At the beginning of his career he focused on structural analysis and even made a contribution to the Gattung problem from a structu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jurie H. le Roux
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2011-04-01
Series:HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1013
id doaj-70bdc93a8d034dd09404a46e102eeb5a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70bdc93a8d034dd09404a46e102eeb5a2020-11-24T23:59:03ZafrAOSISHTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 0259-94222072-80502011-04-01671e1e1010.4102/hts.v67i1.1013805Andries van Aarde’s Matthew InterpretationJurie H. le Roux0Department of Old Testament Studies, University of PretoriaThis article focused on Andries van Aarde’s interpretation of the Gospel of Matthew. It argues that Van Aarde has changed his approach to Matthew in the course of time. At the beginning of his career he focused on structural analysis and even made a contribution to the Gattung problem from a structural perspective. Then his attention shifted to narrative criticism and social-scientific criticism. Van Aarde’s consistent narratological interpretation of Matthew enabled him to identify Matthew’s ideology and to determine the way in which it took shape on the surface structure. This narratological investigation also shed new light on, amongst others, the parables, the characters and the problem of direct and indirect discourse. To conclude the article, some critical statements with regard to the historical understanding of the Gospel of Matthew were formulated.https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1013Gospel of Matthewhistorical criticismnarrative criticismsocial-scientific criticismAndries G. van Aarde
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jurie H. le Roux
spellingShingle Jurie H. le Roux
Andries van Aarde’s Matthew Interpretation
HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
Gospel of Matthew
historical criticism
narrative criticism
social-scientific criticism
Andries G. van Aarde
author_facet Jurie H. le Roux
author_sort Jurie H. le Roux
title Andries van Aarde’s Matthew Interpretation
title_short Andries van Aarde’s Matthew Interpretation
title_full Andries van Aarde’s Matthew Interpretation
title_fullStr Andries van Aarde’s Matthew Interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Andries van Aarde’s Matthew Interpretation
title_sort andries van aarde’s matthew interpretation
publisher AOSIS
series HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies
issn 0259-9422
2072-8050
publishDate 2011-04-01
description This article focused on Andries van Aarde’s interpretation of the Gospel of Matthew. It argues that Van Aarde has changed his approach to Matthew in the course of time. At the beginning of his career he focused on structural analysis and even made a contribution to the Gattung problem from a structural perspective. Then his attention shifted to narrative criticism and social-scientific criticism. Van Aarde’s consistent narratological interpretation of Matthew enabled him to identify Matthew’s ideology and to determine the way in which it took shape on the surface structure. This narratological investigation also shed new light on, amongst others, the parables, the characters and the problem of direct and indirect discourse. To conclude the article, some critical statements with regard to the historical understanding of the Gospel of Matthew were formulated.
topic Gospel of Matthew
historical criticism
narrative criticism
social-scientific criticism
Andries G. van Aarde
url https://hts.org.za/index.php/hts/article/view/1013
work_keys_str_mv AT juriehleroux andriesvanaardesmatthewinterpretation
_version_ 1725448373642723328