A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes
The goal of re-examinination of seismic design codes is aimed at making their provisions as transparent as possible for users so that the design would be clear and enriching for structural engineers. This paper presents a transparency evaluation of the codes currently being used in the USA and Colom...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia
2013-05-01
|
Series: | Ingeniería e Investigación |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/39506 |
id |
doaj-70b5bfb2a2b04454b3f9c54a4fd9161b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-70b5bfb2a2b04454b3f9c54a4fd9161b2020-11-25T02:15:24ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaIngeniería e Investigación0120-56092248-87232013-05-01332242933815A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codesJulian Carrillo0John Blandón Valencia1Astrid Rubiano2Universidad Militar Nueva GranadaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - sede MedellínUniversidad Militar Nueva GranadaThe goal of re-examinination of seismic design codes is aimed at making their provisions as transparent as possible for users so that the design would be clear and enriching for structural engineers. This paper presents a transparency evaluation of the codes currently being used in the USA and Colombia for seismic design of buildings. It is demonstrated that the procedures used in most codes do not offer a clear view of buildings’ seismic response assessment. The Colombian code should become as conceptually transparent as possible when defining strength modification factors and assessing maximum lateral displacement. In addition, at least two limit states (service and life safety) should be clearly defined, along with allowable story drift thereby better reflect expected structural performance. Otherwise, using current procedures could lead not only to interpretation errors but also inadequate estimation of seismic strength and deformation demands.https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/39506seismic designstrength reductionover-strengthductilitydisplacement amplificationdrift limit |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Julian Carrillo John Blandón Valencia Astrid Rubiano |
spellingShingle |
Julian Carrillo John Blandón Valencia Astrid Rubiano A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes Ingeniería e Investigación seismic design strength reduction over-strength ductility displacement amplification drift limit |
author_facet |
Julian Carrillo John Blandón Valencia Astrid Rubiano |
author_sort |
Julian Carrillo |
title |
A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes |
title_short |
A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes |
title_full |
A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes |
title_fullStr |
A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes |
title_full_unstemmed |
A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes |
title_sort |
review of conceptual transparency in us and colombian seismic design building codes |
publisher |
Universidad Nacional de Colombia |
series |
Ingeniería e Investigación |
issn |
0120-5609 2248-8723 |
publishDate |
2013-05-01 |
description |
The goal of re-examinination of seismic design codes is aimed at making their provisions as transparent as possible for users so that the design would be clear and enriching for structural engineers. This paper presents a transparency evaluation of the codes currently being used in the USA and Colombia for seismic design of buildings. It is demonstrated that the procedures used in most codes do not offer a clear view of buildings’ seismic response assessment. The Colombian code should become as conceptually transparent as possible when defining strength modification factors and assessing maximum lateral displacement. In addition, at least two limit states (service and life safety) should be clearly defined, along with allowable story drift thereby better reflect expected structural performance. Otherwise, using current procedures could lead not only to interpretation errors but also inadequate estimation of seismic strength and deformation demands. |
topic |
seismic design strength reduction over-strength ductility displacement amplification drift limit |
url |
https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/39506 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT juliancarrillo areviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes AT johnblandonvalencia areviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes AT astridrubiano areviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes AT juliancarrillo reviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes AT johnblandonvalencia reviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes AT astridrubiano reviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes |
_version_ |
1724896740142743552 |