A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes

The goal of re-examinination of seismic design codes is aimed at making their provisions as transparent as possible for users so that the design would be clear and enriching for structural engineers. This paper presents a transparency evaluation of the codes currently being used in the USA and Colom...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian Carrillo, John Blandón Valencia, Astrid Rubiano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad Nacional de Colombia 2013-05-01
Series:Ingeniería e Investigación
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/39506
id doaj-70b5bfb2a2b04454b3f9c54a4fd9161b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70b5bfb2a2b04454b3f9c54a4fd9161b2020-11-25T02:15:24ZengUniversidad Nacional de ColombiaIngeniería e Investigación0120-56092248-87232013-05-01332242933815A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codesJulian Carrillo0John Blandón Valencia1Astrid Rubiano2Universidad Militar Nueva GranadaUniversidad Nacional de Colombia - sede MedellínUniversidad Militar Nueva GranadaThe goal of re-examinination of seismic design codes is aimed at making their provisions as transparent as possible for users so that the design would be clear and enriching for structural engineers. This paper presents a transparency evaluation of the codes currently being used in the USA and Colombia for seismic design of buildings. It is demonstrated that the procedures used in most codes do not offer a clear view of buildings’ seismic response assessment. The Colombian code should become as conceptually transparent as possible when defining strength modification factors and assessing maximum lateral displacement. In addition, at least two limit states (service and life safety) should be clearly defined, along with allowable story drift thereby better reflect expected structural performance. Otherwise, using current procedures could lead not only to interpretation errors but also inadequate estimation of seismic strength and deformation demands.https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/39506seismic designstrength reductionover-strengthductilitydisplacement amplificationdrift limit
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julian Carrillo
John Blandón Valencia
Astrid Rubiano
spellingShingle Julian Carrillo
John Blandón Valencia
Astrid Rubiano
A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes
Ingeniería e Investigación
seismic design
strength reduction
over-strength
ductility
displacement amplification
drift limit
author_facet Julian Carrillo
John Blandón Valencia
Astrid Rubiano
author_sort Julian Carrillo
title A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes
title_short A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes
title_full A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes
title_fullStr A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes
title_full_unstemmed A review of conceptual transparency in US and Colombian seismic design building codes
title_sort review of conceptual transparency in us and colombian seismic design building codes
publisher Universidad Nacional de Colombia
series Ingeniería e Investigación
issn 0120-5609
2248-8723
publishDate 2013-05-01
description The goal of re-examinination of seismic design codes is aimed at making their provisions as transparent as possible for users so that the design would be clear and enriching for structural engineers. This paper presents a transparency evaluation of the codes currently being used in the USA and Colombia for seismic design of buildings. It is demonstrated that the procedures used in most codes do not offer a clear view of buildings’ seismic response assessment. The Colombian code should become as conceptually transparent as possible when defining strength modification factors and assessing maximum lateral displacement. In addition, at least two limit states (service and life safety) should be clearly defined, along with allowable story drift thereby better reflect expected structural performance. Otherwise, using current procedures could lead not only to interpretation errors but also inadequate estimation of seismic strength and deformation demands.
topic seismic design
strength reduction
over-strength
ductility
displacement amplification
drift limit
url https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/ingeinv/article/view/39506
work_keys_str_mv AT juliancarrillo areviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes
AT johnblandonvalencia areviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes
AT astridrubiano areviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes
AT juliancarrillo reviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes
AT johnblandonvalencia reviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes
AT astridrubiano reviewofconceptualtransparencyinusandcolombianseismicdesignbuildingcodes
_version_ 1724896740142743552