Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Greek clinical population

Background: Catastrophizing is an important psychological construct in mediating the behavioral response toward pain. Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in Greek clinical population. Methods: The scale was administer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anna Christakou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: World Scientific Publishing 2021-12-01
Series:Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/epdf/10.1142/S1013702521500086
id doaj-70a196af493148d6b9f8a44c2dc04918
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70a196af493148d6b9f8a44c2dc049182021-06-14T07:03:32ZengWorld Scientific PublishingHong Kong Physiotherapy Journal1013-70251876-441X2021-12-01412899810.1142/S101370252150008610.1142/S1013702521500086Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Greek clinical populationAnna Christakou0Department of Physiotherapy, University of West Attica, Athens, GreeceBackground: Catastrophizing is an important psychological construct in mediating the behavioral response toward pain. Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in Greek clinical population. Methods: The scale was administered in 376 patients with chronic cervical and lumbar pain. Test–retest reliability, internal consistency (Cronbach α) and concurrent validity were assessed. Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to test the factorial validity of the hypothesized three factor structure. Results: The PCS factors suggested high levels of test–retest reliability, whereas Cronbachs’ α values were acceptable. The EFA yielded a three-factor solution and indicated a marginal fit to the data. CFA procedures indicated a rather acceptable fit to the data. The concurrent validity of the instrument was confirmed. Conclusion: PCS seems to be a reliable and valid instrument in Greek patients with chronic cervical and lumbar pain.http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/epdf/10.1142/S1013702521500086reliabilityvaliditychronic musculoskeletal paingreek patients
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anna Christakou
spellingShingle Anna Christakou
Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Greek clinical population
Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
reliability
validity
chronic musculoskeletal pain
greek patients
author_facet Anna Christakou
author_sort Anna Christakou
title Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Greek clinical population
title_short Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Greek clinical population
title_full Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Greek clinical population
title_fullStr Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Greek clinical population
title_full_unstemmed Cross-cultural adaptation of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in Greek clinical population
title_sort cross-cultural adaptation of the pain catastrophizing scale in greek clinical population
publisher World Scientific Publishing
series Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal
issn 1013-7025
1876-441X
publishDate 2021-12-01
description Background: Catastrophizing is an important psychological construct in mediating the behavioral response toward pain. Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) in Greek clinical population. Methods: The scale was administered in 376 patients with chronic cervical and lumbar pain. Test–retest reliability, internal consistency (Cronbach α) and concurrent validity were assessed. Exploratory (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to test the factorial validity of the hypothesized three factor structure. Results: The PCS factors suggested high levels of test–retest reliability, whereas Cronbachs’ α values were acceptable. The EFA yielded a three-factor solution and indicated a marginal fit to the data. CFA procedures indicated a rather acceptable fit to the data. The concurrent validity of the instrument was confirmed. Conclusion: PCS seems to be a reliable and valid instrument in Greek patients with chronic cervical and lumbar pain.
topic reliability
validity
chronic musculoskeletal pain
greek patients
url http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/epdf/10.1142/S1013702521500086
work_keys_str_mv AT annachristakou crossculturaladaptationofthepaincatastrophizingscaleingreekclinicalpopulation
_version_ 1721378588200009728