Doubtful swelling on clinical examination reflects synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implication of doubtful joint swelling on clinical examination with respect to objective markers of synovitis by ultrasound (US) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Two independent observers performed a modified 28 swollen joint assess...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter Mandl, Paul Studenic, Gabriela Supp, Martina Durechova, Stefanie Haider, Michaela Lehner, Tanja Stamm, Josef S. Smolen, Daniel Aletaha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-06-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20933489
id doaj-70995ccd137f4fb49b7775b22bb7cf2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70995ccd137f4fb49b7775b22bb7cf2a2021-07-14T10:05:12ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease1759-72182020-06-011210.1177/1759720X20933489Doubtful swelling on clinical examination reflects synovitis in rheumatoid arthritisPeter MandlPaul StudenicGabriela SuppMartina DurechovaStefanie HaiderMichaela LehnerTanja StammJosef S. SmolenDaniel AletahaAims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implication of doubtful joint swelling on clinical examination with respect to objective markers of synovitis by ultrasound (US) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Two independent observers performed a modified 28 swollen joint assessment (28SJC), in which joints could be graded as either definitely swollen, non-swollen, or doubtfully swollen. Two examiners blinded to clinical information performed US assessment of the hands. We performed descriptive statistics and models to analyse the links between clinical assessment and objective markers of inflammation. Results: A total of 1204 joints were evaluated in 43 RA patients; 93% (40/43) of patients had ⩾1 joint with doubtful swelling (range: 0–4/patient). Inter-reader reliability for the modified 28SJC was good (0.74). Generally, both grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) discriminated across not swollen, doubtful, and swollen joints. GS signals discriminated better than PD between doubtful swelling and no swelling [odds ratio (OR) for GS: 5.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–23.3 versus OR for PD 1.7; 95% CI 0.2–13.0], whereas PD discriminated better than GS between swelling and doubtful swelling (OR for PD: 28.7; 95% CI 3.6–228.2 versus GS: 1.7; 95% CI 0.3–8.4). Joint osteophytes did not increase the degree of doubtfulness. Conclusion: Clinical doubt in the assessment of joint swelling constitutes an intermediate state between unequivocal swelling and the lack thereof also regarding the objectively quantified level of inflammation. In order to increase sensitivity for joint inflammation, the historical clinical approach of considering doubtful swelling the absence of swelling should be revisited to interpret clinical doubtfulness as an indication of swelling.https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20933489
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Mandl
Paul Studenic
Gabriela Supp
Martina Durechova
Stefanie Haider
Michaela Lehner
Tanja Stamm
Josef S. Smolen
Daniel Aletaha
spellingShingle Peter Mandl
Paul Studenic
Gabriela Supp
Martina Durechova
Stefanie Haider
Michaela Lehner
Tanja Stamm
Josef S. Smolen
Daniel Aletaha
Doubtful swelling on clinical examination reflects synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
author_facet Peter Mandl
Paul Studenic
Gabriela Supp
Martina Durechova
Stefanie Haider
Michaela Lehner
Tanja Stamm
Josef S. Smolen
Daniel Aletaha
author_sort Peter Mandl
title Doubtful swelling on clinical examination reflects synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Doubtful swelling on clinical examination reflects synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis
title_full Doubtful swelling on clinical examination reflects synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis
title_fullStr Doubtful swelling on clinical examination reflects synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis
title_full_unstemmed Doubtful swelling on clinical examination reflects synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis
title_sort doubtful swelling on clinical examination reflects synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
issn 1759-7218
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implication of doubtful joint swelling on clinical examination with respect to objective markers of synovitis by ultrasound (US) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Two independent observers performed a modified 28 swollen joint assessment (28SJC), in which joints could be graded as either definitely swollen, non-swollen, or doubtfully swollen. Two examiners blinded to clinical information performed US assessment of the hands. We performed descriptive statistics and models to analyse the links between clinical assessment and objective markers of inflammation. Results: A total of 1204 joints were evaluated in 43 RA patients; 93% (40/43) of patients had ⩾1 joint with doubtful swelling (range: 0–4/patient). Inter-reader reliability for the modified 28SJC was good (0.74). Generally, both grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) discriminated across not swollen, doubtful, and swollen joints. GS signals discriminated better than PD between doubtful swelling and no swelling [odds ratio (OR) for GS: 5.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2–23.3 versus OR for PD 1.7; 95% CI 0.2–13.0], whereas PD discriminated better than GS between swelling and doubtful swelling (OR for PD: 28.7; 95% CI 3.6–228.2 versus GS: 1.7; 95% CI 0.3–8.4). Joint osteophytes did not increase the degree of doubtfulness. Conclusion: Clinical doubt in the assessment of joint swelling constitutes an intermediate state between unequivocal swelling and the lack thereof also regarding the objectively quantified level of inflammation. In order to increase sensitivity for joint inflammation, the historical clinical approach of considering doubtful swelling the absence of swelling should be revisited to interpret clinical doubtfulness as an indication of swelling.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20933489
work_keys_str_mv AT petermandl doubtfulswellingonclinicalexaminationreflectssynovitisinrheumatoidarthritis
AT paulstudenic doubtfulswellingonclinicalexaminationreflectssynovitisinrheumatoidarthritis
AT gabrielasupp doubtfulswellingonclinicalexaminationreflectssynovitisinrheumatoidarthritis
AT martinadurechova doubtfulswellingonclinicalexaminationreflectssynovitisinrheumatoidarthritis
AT stefaniehaider doubtfulswellingonclinicalexaminationreflectssynovitisinrheumatoidarthritis
AT michaelalehner doubtfulswellingonclinicalexaminationreflectssynovitisinrheumatoidarthritis
AT tanjastamm doubtfulswellingonclinicalexaminationreflectssynovitisinrheumatoidarthritis
AT josefssmolen doubtfulswellingonclinicalexaminationreflectssynovitisinrheumatoidarthritis
AT danielaletaha doubtfulswellingonclinicalexaminationreflectssynovitisinrheumatoidarthritis
_version_ 1721303066664239104