Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji I Konsumentów (Case C-617/17)
The judgement of EU Court of Justice in response to the request for a preliminary ruling by the Polish Supreme Court confirms that the principle of ne bis in idem, enshrined in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding a national com...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Warsaw
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/yars2019_12_20/231.pdf |
id |
doaj-707b10f3333445369145fed91bfb9dd0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-707b10f3333445369145fed91bfb9dd02020-11-25T02:49:58ZengUniversity of WarsawYearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies1689-90242545-01152019-12-01122023124310.7172/1689-9024.YARS.2019.12.20.9Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji I Konsumentów (Case C-617/17)Mario Libertini0 Law Department of “Sapienza” University of RomeThe judgement of EU Court of Justice in response to the request for a preliminary ruling by the Polish Supreme Court confirms that the principle of ne bis in idem, enshrined in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding a national competition authority from fining an undertaking in a single decision for an infringement of national competition law and for an infringement of Article 82 EC (now Article 102 TFEU). In that regard it can be concluded that the judgement does not have anything new and is just a confirmation of settled case-law. Unfortunately, this case represents a lost opportunity to review the ‘double barrier’ doctrine and to clarify if the relationship between European and national competition law is one of ‘bilateral specialty’ or not.https://www.yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/yars2019_12_20/231.pdfne bis in idem principle; objectives of eu competition lawobjectives of national competition laws |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mario Libertini |
spellingShingle |
Mario Libertini Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji I Konsumentów (Case C-617/17) Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies ne bis in idem principle; objectives of eu competition law objectives of national competition laws |
author_facet |
Mario Libertini |
author_sort |
Mario Libertini |
title |
Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji I Konsumentów (Case C-617/17) |
title_short |
Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji I Konsumentów (Case C-617/17) |
title_full |
Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji I Konsumentów (Case C-617/17) |
title_fullStr |
Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji I Konsumentów (Case C-617/17) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cumulative Enforcement of European and National Competition Law and the Ne Bis In Idem Principle Case Comment to the Judgement of EU Court of Justice of 3 April 2019Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie S.A. v Prezes Urzędu Ochrony Konkurencji I Konsumentów (Case C-617/17) |
title_sort |
cumulative enforcement of european and national competition law and the ne bis in idem principle case comment to the judgement of eu court of justice of 3 april 2019powszechny zakład ubezpieczeń na życie s.a. v prezes urzędu ochrony konkurencji i konsumentów (case c-617/17) |
publisher |
University of Warsaw |
series |
Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies |
issn |
1689-9024 2545-0115 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
The judgement of EU Court of Justice in response to the request for a preliminary ruling by the Polish Supreme Court confirms that the principle of ne bis in idem, enshrined in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding a national competition authority from fining an undertaking in a single decision for an infringement of national competition law and for an infringement of Article 82 EC (now Article 102 TFEU). In that regard it can be concluded that the judgement does not have anything new and is just a confirmation of settled case-law. Unfortunately, this case represents a lost opportunity to review the ‘double barrier’ doctrine and to clarify if the relationship between European and national competition law is one of ‘bilateral specialty’ or not. |
topic |
ne bis in idem principle; objectives of eu competition law objectives of national competition laws |
url |
https://www.yars.wz.uw.edu.pl/yars2019_12_20/231.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariolibertini cumulativeenforcementofeuropeanandnationalcompetitionlawandthenebisinidemprinciplecasecommenttothejudgementofeucourtofjusticeof3april2019powszechnyzakładubezpieczennazyciesavprezesurzeduochronykonkurencjiikonsumentowcasec61717 |
_version_ |
1724741018849378304 |