Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez

The aim of the study was to establish a DNA isolation protocol Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez., able to obtain samples of high yield and quality for use in genomic analysis. A commercial kit and four classical methods of DNA extraction were tested, including three cetyltrimethylammonium bromid...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leonardo Severo da Costa, Lia Rejane Silveira Reiniger, Valdir Marcos Stefenon, Berta Maria Heinzmann, Adriel dos Santos Oliveira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Londrina 2016-06-01
Series:Semina: Ciências Agrárias
Subjects:
SDS
Online Access:http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305
id doaj-706c057b7aef4c5cb126a6067c7df0c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-706c057b7aef4c5cb126a6067c7df0c82020-11-25T00:55:48ZengUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaSemina: Ciências Agrárias1676-546X1679-03592016-06-013731177118810.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n3p117713929Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) MezLeonardo Severo da Costa0Lia Rejane Silveira Reiniger1Valdir Marcos Stefenon2Berta Maria Heinzmann3Adriel dos Santos Oliveira4Universidade Federal de Santa MariaUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaUniversidade Federal do PampaUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaUniversidade Federal de Santa MariaThe aim of the study was to establish a DNA isolation protocol Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez., able to obtain samples of high yield and quality for use in genomic analysis. A commercial kit and four classical methods of DNA extraction were tested, including three cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based and one sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based methods. Three drying methods for leaves samples were also evaluated including drying at room temperature (RT), in an oven at 40ºC (S40), and in a microwave oven (FMO). The DNA solutions obtained from different types of leaves samples using the five protocols were assessed in terms of cost, execution time, and quality and yield of extracted DNA. The commercial kit did not extract DNA with sufficient quantity or quality for successful PCR reactions. Among the classic methods, only the protocols of Dellaporta and of Khanuja yielded DNA extractions for all three types of foliar samples that resulted in successful PCR reactions and subsequent enzyme restriction assays. Based on the evaluated variables, the most appropriate DNA extraction method for Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez. was that of Dellaporta, regardless of the method used to dry the samples. The selected method has a relatively low cost and total execution time. Moreover, the quality and quantity of DNA extracted using this method was sufficient for DNA sequence amplification using PCR reactions and to get restriction fragments.http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305CTABSDSCostQualityYield.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leonardo Severo da Costa
Lia Rejane Silveira Reiniger
Valdir Marcos Stefenon
Berta Maria Heinzmann
Adriel dos Santos Oliveira
spellingShingle Leonardo Severo da Costa
Lia Rejane Silveira Reiniger
Valdir Marcos Stefenon
Berta Maria Heinzmann
Adriel dos Santos Oliveira
Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
Semina: Ciências Agrárias
CTAB
SDS
Cost
Quality
Yield.
author_facet Leonardo Severo da Costa
Lia Rejane Silveira Reiniger
Valdir Marcos Stefenon
Berta Maria Heinzmann
Adriel dos Santos Oliveira
author_sort Leonardo Severo da Costa
title Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title_short Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title_full Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of five DNA isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez
title_sort comparative analysis of five dna isolation protocols and three drying methods for leaves samples of nectandra megapotamica (spreng.) mez
publisher Universidade Estadual de Londrina
series Semina: Ciências Agrárias
issn 1676-546X
1679-0359
publishDate 2016-06-01
description The aim of the study was to establish a DNA isolation protocol Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez., able to obtain samples of high yield and quality for use in genomic analysis. A commercial kit and four classical methods of DNA extraction were tested, including three cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-based and one sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based methods. Three drying methods for leaves samples were also evaluated including drying at room temperature (RT), in an oven at 40ºC (S40), and in a microwave oven (FMO). The DNA solutions obtained from different types of leaves samples using the five protocols were assessed in terms of cost, execution time, and quality and yield of extracted DNA. The commercial kit did not extract DNA with sufficient quantity or quality for successful PCR reactions. Among the classic methods, only the protocols of Dellaporta and of Khanuja yielded DNA extractions for all three types of foliar samples that resulted in successful PCR reactions and subsequent enzyme restriction assays. Based on the evaluated variables, the most appropriate DNA extraction method for Nectandra megapotamica (Spreng.) Mez. was that of Dellaporta, regardless of the method used to dry the samples. The selected method has a relatively low cost and total execution time. Moreover, the quality and quantity of DNA extracted using this method was sufficient for DNA sequence amplification using PCR reactions and to get restriction fragments.
topic CTAB
SDS
Cost
Quality
Yield.
url http://www.uel.br/revistas/uel/index.php/semagrarias/article/view/21305
work_keys_str_mv AT leonardoseverodacosta comparativeanalysisoffivednaisolationprotocolsandthreedryingmethodsforleavessamplesofnectandramegapotamicasprengmez
AT liarejanesilveirareiniger comparativeanalysisoffivednaisolationprotocolsandthreedryingmethodsforleavessamplesofnectandramegapotamicasprengmez
AT valdirmarcosstefenon comparativeanalysisoffivednaisolationprotocolsandthreedryingmethodsforleavessamplesofnectandramegapotamicasprengmez
AT bertamariaheinzmann comparativeanalysisoffivednaisolationprotocolsandthreedryingmethodsforleavessamplesofnectandramegapotamicasprengmez
AT adrieldossantosoliveira comparativeanalysisoffivednaisolationprotocolsandthreedryingmethodsforleavessamplesofnectandramegapotamicasprengmez
_version_ 1725229344097304576