Is "no test is better than a bad test"? Impact of diagnostic uncertainty in mass testing on the spread of COVID-19.
Testing is viewed as a critical aspect of any strategy to tackle epidemics. Much of the dialogue around testing has concentrated on how countries can scale up capacity, but the uncertainty in testing has not received nearly as much attention beyond asking if a test is accurate enough to be used. Eve...
Main Authors: | Nicholas Gray, Dominic Calleja, Alexander Wimbush, Enrique Miralles-Dolz, Ander Gray, Marco De Angelis, Elfriede Derrer-Merk, Bright Uchenna Oparaji, Vladimir Stepanov, Louis Clearkin, Scott Ferson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240775 |
Similar Items
-
Correction: Is no test better than a bad test: Impact of diagnostic uncertainty on the spread of COVID-19.
by: Nicholas Gray, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Robust Surrogate Models for Uncertainty Quantification and Nuclear Engineering Applications
by: Bright, Uchenna-Oparaji, et al.
Published: (2018) -
BadPair: a framework for automated software testing
by: Chang, Chien-Hsing
Published: (2010) -
Effectiveness outcomes of preadmission testing for presurgical patients
by: Home, Elfriede
Published: (2010) -
Improving tuberculosis diagnosis: Better tests or better healthcare?
by: Sumona Datta, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01)