Anxiety/Uncertainty Management and Communication Accommodation in Women’s Brief Dyadic Conversations With a Stranger: An Idiodynamic Approach

This study uses a combination of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and communication accommodation theory perspective to examine differences in the ways women converse with men or with other women. The study uses an innovative approach, the idiodynamic method, to gather detailed data on a per-se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter D. MacIntyre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-07-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861482
id doaj-703f0e302da648259ca897e1ada6f185
record_format Article
spelling doaj-703f0e302da648259ca897e1ada6f1852020-11-25T03:08:35ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-07-01910.1177/2158244019861482Anxiety/Uncertainty Management and Communication Accommodation in Women’s Brief Dyadic Conversations With a Stranger: An Idiodynamic ApproachPeter D. MacIntyre0Cape Breton University, Sydney, Nova Scotia, CanadaThis study uses a combination of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and communication accommodation theory perspective to examine differences in the ways women converse with men or with other women. The study uses an innovative approach, the idiodynamic method, to gather detailed data on a per-second timescale. Participants ( n = 24) were randomly assigned to one of the two types of dyads: female–female or male–female. They then engaged in a videotaped conversation lasting approximately 2 to 5 min. Immediately afterward, participants watched the video of their conversation in separate rooms, during which each provided continuous, dynamic ratings of their anxiety level, and that of their partner, throughout the conversation. Participants were interviewed about the reasons for changes in their ratings of both themselves and their conversational partner. Following a grounded theory approach to analysis, six themes emerged from the interviews: awareness of the camera and researchers, comparison of self and partners, self-judgment, worry about other’s judgment, disinterest, and reaction to miscommunication. The data show that communication accommodation was done differently in the female-only versus female–male pairs, which might reflect processes involving uncertainty, group identification, and continuously negotiated meaning. There is value in using methods that investigate communication processes in real time because doing so allows instances of proposed theoretical differences between genders to emerge in actual conversation between persons.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861482
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter D. MacIntyre
spellingShingle Peter D. MacIntyre
Anxiety/Uncertainty Management and Communication Accommodation in Women’s Brief Dyadic Conversations With a Stranger: An Idiodynamic Approach
SAGE Open
author_facet Peter D. MacIntyre
author_sort Peter D. MacIntyre
title Anxiety/Uncertainty Management and Communication Accommodation in Women’s Brief Dyadic Conversations With a Stranger: An Idiodynamic Approach
title_short Anxiety/Uncertainty Management and Communication Accommodation in Women’s Brief Dyadic Conversations With a Stranger: An Idiodynamic Approach
title_full Anxiety/Uncertainty Management and Communication Accommodation in Women’s Brief Dyadic Conversations With a Stranger: An Idiodynamic Approach
title_fullStr Anxiety/Uncertainty Management and Communication Accommodation in Women’s Brief Dyadic Conversations With a Stranger: An Idiodynamic Approach
title_full_unstemmed Anxiety/Uncertainty Management and Communication Accommodation in Women’s Brief Dyadic Conversations With a Stranger: An Idiodynamic Approach
title_sort anxiety/uncertainty management and communication accommodation in women’s brief dyadic conversations with a stranger: an idiodynamic approach
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2019-07-01
description This study uses a combination of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and communication accommodation theory perspective to examine differences in the ways women converse with men or with other women. The study uses an innovative approach, the idiodynamic method, to gather detailed data on a per-second timescale. Participants ( n = 24) were randomly assigned to one of the two types of dyads: female–female or male–female. They then engaged in a videotaped conversation lasting approximately 2 to 5 min. Immediately afterward, participants watched the video of their conversation in separate rooms, during which each provided continuous, dynamic ratings of their anxiety level, and that of their partner, throughout the conversation. Participants were interviewed about the reasons for changes in their ratings of both themselves and their conversational partner. Following a grounded theory approach to analysis, six themes emerged from the interviews: awareness of the camera and researchers, comparison of self and partners, self-judgment, worry about other’s judgment, disinterest, and reaction to miscommunication. The data show that communication accommodation was done differently in the female-only versus female–male pairs, which might reflect processes involving uncertainty, group identification, and continuously negotiated meaning. There is value in using methods that investigate communication processes in real time because doing so allows instances of proposed theoretical differences between genders to emerge in actual conversation between persons.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019861482
work_keys_str_mv AT peterdmacintyre anxietyuncertaintymanagementandcommunicationaccommodationinwomensbriefdyadicconversationswithastrangeranidiodynamicapproach
_version_ 1724665645909409792