Complementary Methods in Cancer Treatment—Cure or Curse?

(1) Background: The prevalence of complementary and alternative methods (CAM) use among oncological patients has been rising constantly over the last few decades and a variety of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods have been developed. Many advertisements promise to relieve side eff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaja Michalczyk, Jakub Pawlik, Izabela Czekawy, Mateusz Kozłowski, Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-01-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/356
id doaj-703c6ce85c5e4dd78be045629fa6d863
record_format Article
spelling doaj-703c6ce85c5e4dd78be045629fa6d8632021-01-06T00:04:35ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1661-78271660-46012021-01-011835635610.3390/ijerph18010356Complementary Methods in Cancer Treatment—Cure or Curse?Kaja Michalczyk0Jakub Pawlik1Izabela Czekawy2Mateusz Kozłowski3Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska4Department of Gynecological Surgery and Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, PolandDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, PolandDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, PolandDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, PolandDepartment of Gynecological Surgery and Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, al. Powstańców Wielkopolskich 72, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland(1) Background: The prevalence of complementary and alternative methods (CAM) use among oncological patients has been rising constantly over the last few decades and a variety of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods have been developed. Many advertisements promise to relieve side effects of chemotherapy or even to cure the disease, thus encouraging patients to use CAM; (2) Methods: The objective of the study was to determine which patients’ characteristics are associated with the use of complementary medicine during cancer treatment, their pattern of use, and if it has any association with its safety profile. This survey-based prospective multicenter study of 316 patients examined the use of complementary medicine among patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment in cancer centers in Poland between 2017 and 2019; (3) Results: The Chi2 analysis showed that patients’ opinion regarding the safety of unconventional methods is related to the use of CAM (<i>p</i><i> </i>= 0.00147). Moreover, patients’ thinking that alternative medicine can replace traditional therapy was correlated with his/her education (<i>p</i> = 0.01198). Moreover, we performed univariate and multivariate analysis to determine factors associated with CAM use including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Finally, we conducted survival analysis of patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment with 42 months of follow-up time of our prospective study. Using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank analysis, we found no statistical difference in overall survival between the groups that used and did not use any form of CAM (<i>p</i><i> </i>= 0.211); (4) Conclusions: CAM use is common among patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment and should be considered by medical teams as some agents may interact with chemotherapy drugs and affect their efficacy or cause adverse effects.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/356complementary medicinealternative treatmentchemotherapycancer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kaja Michalczyk
Jakub Pawlik
Izabela Czekawy
Mateusz Kozłowski
Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
spellingShingle Kaja Michalczyk
Jakub Pawlik
Izabela Czekawy
Mateusz Kozłowski
Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
Complementary Methods in Cancer Treatment—Cure or Curse?
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
complementary medicine
alternative treatment
chemotherapy
cancer
author_facet Kaja Michalczyk
Jakub Pawlik
Izabela Czekawy
Mateusz Kozłowski
Aneta Cymbaluk-Płoska
author_sort Kaja Michalczyk
title Complementary Methods in Cancer Treatment—Cure or Curse?
title_short Complementary Methods in Cancer Treatment—Cure or Curse?
title_full Complementary Methods in Cancer Treatment—Cure or Curse?
title_fullStr Complementary Methods in Cancer Treatment—Cure or Curse?
title_full_unstemmed Complementary Methods in Cancer Treatment—Cure or Curse?
title_sort complementary methods in cancer treatment—cure or curse?
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
publishDate 2021-01-01
description (1) Background: The prevalence of complementary and alternative methods (CAM) use among oncological patients has been rising constantly over the last few decades and a variety of both pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods have been developed. Many advertisements promise to relieve side effects of chemotherapy or even to cure the disease, thus encouraging patients to use CAM; (2) Methods: The objective of the study was to determine which patients’ characteristics are associated with the use of complementary medicine during cancer treatment, their pattern of use, and if it has any association with its safety profile. This survey-based prospective multicenter study of 316 patients examined the use of complementary medicine among patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment in cancer centers in Poland between 2017 and 2019; (3) Results: The Chi2 analysis showed that patients’ opinion regarding the safety of unconventional methods is related to the use of CAM (<i>p</i><i> </i>= 0.00147). Moreover, patients’ thinking that alternative medicine can replace traditional therapy was correlated with his/her education (<i>p</i> = 0.01198). Moreover, we performed univariate and multivariate analysis to determine factors associated with CAM use including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Finally, we conducted survival analysis of patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment with 42 months of follow-up time of our prospective study. Using Kaplan–Meier curves and log-rank analysis, we found no statistical difference in overall survival between the groups that used and did not use any form of CAM (<i>p</i><i> </i>= 0.211); (4) Conclusions: CAM use is common among patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment and should be considered by medical teams as some agents may interact with chemotherapy drugs and affect their efficacy or cause adverse effects.
topic complementary medicine
alternative treatment
chemotherapy
cancer
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/1/356
work_keys_str_mv AT kajamichalczyk complementarymethodsincancertreatmentcureorcurse
AT jakubpawlik complementarymethodsincancertreatmentcureorcurse
AT izabelaczekawy complementarymethodsincancertreatmentcureorcurse
AT mateuszkozłowski complementarymethodsincancertreatmentcureorcurse
AT anetacymbalukpłoska complementarymethodsincancertreatmentcureorcurse
_version_ 1724347861559148544