Economic evaluation of increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization can lead to the detection of more people with high risk coronary disease and opportunity for subsequent revascularization. However, such a strategy should only be undertaken if i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Clement Fiona M, Ghali William A, Rinfret Stephane, Manns Braden J
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-11-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/324
id doaj-70250f9fa4a54ef5ab4a14959df0596e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70250f9fa4a54ef5ab4a14959df0596e2020-11-25T01:30:38ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632011-11-0111132410.1186/1472-6963-11-324Economic evaluation of increasing population rates of cardiac catheterizationClement Fiona MGhali William ARinfret StephaneManns Braden J<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization can lead to the detection of more people with high risk coronary disease and opportunity for subsequent revascularization. However, such a strategy should only be undertaken if it is cost-effective.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Based on data from a cohort of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, and efficacy data from clinical trials, we used a Markov model that considered 1) the yield of high-risk cases as the catheterization rate increases, 2) the long-term survival, quality of life and costs for patients with high risk disease, and 3) the impact of revascularization on survival, quality of life and costs. The cost per quality-adjusted life year was calculated overall, and by indication, age, and sex subgroups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Increasing the catheterization rate was associated with a cost per QALY of CAN$26,470. The cost per QALY was most attractive in females with Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) ($20,320 per QALY gained), and for ACS patients over 75 years of age ($16,538 per QALY gained). However, there is significant model uncertainty associated with the efficacy of revascularization.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A strategy of increasing cardiac catheterization rates among eligible patients is associated with a cost per QALY similar to that of other funded interventions. However, there is significant model uncertainty. A decision to increase population rates of catheterization requires consideration of the accompanying opportunity costs, and careful thought towards the most appropriate strategy.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/324
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Clement Fiona M
Ghali William A
Rinfret Stephane
Manns Braden J
spellingShingle Clement Fiona M
Ghali William A
Rinfret Stephane
Manns Braden J
Economic evaluation of increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization
BMC Health Services Research
author_facet Clement Fiona M
Ghali William A
Rinfret Stephane
Manns Braden J
author_sort Clement Fiona M
title Economic evaluation of increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization
title_short Economic evaluation of increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization
title_full Economic evaluation of increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization
title_sort economic evaluation of increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2011-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Increasing population rates of cardiac catheterization can lead to the detection of more people with high risk coronary disease and opportunity for subsequent revascularization. However, such a strategy should only be undertaken if it is cost-effective.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Based on data from a cohort of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization, and efficacy data from clinical trials, we used a Markov model that considered 1) the yield of high-risk cases as the catheterization rate increases, 2) the long-term survival, quality of life and costs for patients with high risk disease, and 3) the impact of revascularization on survival, quality of life and costs. The cost per quality-adjusted life year was calculated overall, and by indication, age, and sex subgroups.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Increasing the catheterization rate was associated with a cost per QALY of CAN$26,470. The cost per QALY was most attractive in females with Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS) ($20,320 per QALY gained), and for ACS patients over 75 years of age ($16,538 per QALY gained). However, there is significant model uncertainty associated with the efficacy of revascularization.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A strategy of increasing cardiac catheterization rates among eligible patients is associated with a cost per QALY similar to that of other funded interventions. However, there is significant model uncertainty. A decision to increase population rates of catheterization requires consideration of the accompanying opportunity costs, and careful thought towards the most appropriate strategy.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/324
work_keys_str_mv AT clementfionam economicevaluationofincreasingpopulationratesofcardiaccatheterization
AT ghaliwilliama economicevaluationofincreasingpopulationratesofcardiaccatheterization
AT rinfretstephane economicevaluationofincreasingpopulationratesofcardiaccatheterization
AT mannsbradenj economicevaluationofincreasingpopulationratesofcardiaccatheterization
_version_ 1725090956251758592