Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection
Engaging with the methods of studying contemporary digital audiovisual art is a dominant topic in contemporary theories of art. Against this background, the article offers a view onto some aspects of Juri Lotman’s and Gilles Deleuze’s studies on the cinema. As a rule, contemporary studies of dig...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Tartu Press
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Sign Systems Studies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17092 |
id |
doaj-702467a6ad02486090d6ebda56a0ac76 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-702467a6ad02486090d6ebda56a0ac762021-04-02T19:18:44ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092020-12-01482-410.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.10Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersectionMihael Konstantinov0The Department of Hebrew and Comparative Literature, The University of Haifa. Aba Khoushy Ave 199, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel Engaging with the methods of studying contemporary digital audiovisual art is a dominant topic in contemporary theories of art. Against this background, the article offers a view onto some aspects of Juri Lotman’s and Gilles Deleuze’s studies on the cinema. As a rule, contemporary studies of digital audiovisual art take place in the context of interdisciplinary studies. One of the methodological principles of such studies consists in adopting a structural and semiotic approach. As of today, this methodological approach to studying audio-visual art is most developed in semiotics of the cinema, which is why in this article visual semiotics in general is viewed through semiotics of the cinema (proceeding from the approach of Juri Lotman). Also, the philosophical understanding of the nature of the cinema offered by Gilles Deleuze has proven fundamental for the study of contemporary audio-visual art. The two authors were contemporaries, but represented different scholarly paradigms: while Juri Lotman was an adherent of structuralism, Gilles Deleuze was a poststructuralist who criticized the structuralist approach. Yet despite this principal difference, both scholars still arrived at similar conclusions as concerns several questions regarding the understanding of the cinema and its very nature. In the present paper I focus on the features of these authors’ approach to spatial and temporal relations in the cinema, audiovisual relations in film as a heterogeneous form of the work of art, virtuality and mythologism in the viewer’s perception of cinema. The differences and similarities in academic approaches to cinema, developed by Lotman and Deleuze, indicate a common direction in the development of the cinema and visual arts theory, which seems relevant for the study of contemporary audio-visual arts. https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17092DeleuzeLotmanspatio-temporal blocs (relations)nonlinear narrative constructionmovement-imagetime-image |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mihael Konstantinov |
spellingShingle |
Mihael Konstantinov Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection Sign Systems Studies Deleuze Lotman spatio-temporal blocs (relations) nonlinear narrative construction movement-image time-image |
author_facet |
Mihael Konstantinov |
author_sort |
Mihael Konstantinov |
title |
Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection |
title_short |
Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection |
title_full |
Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection |
title_fullStr |
Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection |
title_full_unstemmed |
Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection |
title_sort |
juri lotman, gilles deleuze and their approaches to cinema: points of intersection |
publisher |
University of Tartu Press |
series |
Sign Systems Studies |
issn |
1406-4243 1736-7409 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Engaging with the methods of studying contemporary digital audiovisual art is a dominant topic in contemporary theories of art. Against this background, the article offers a view onto some aspects of Juri Lotman’s and Gilles Deleuze’s studies on the cinema.
As a rule, contemporary studies of digital audiovisual art take place in the context of interdisciplinary studies. One of the methodological principles of such studies consists in adopting a structural and semiotic approach. As of today, this methodological approach to studying audio-visual art is most developed in semiotics of the cinema, which is why in this article visual semiotics in general is viewed through semiotics of the cinema (proceeding from the approach of Juri Lotman). Also, the philosophical understanding of the nature of the cinema offered by Gilles Deleuze has proven fundamental for the study of contemporary audio-visual art.
The two authors were contemporaries, but represented different scholarly paradigms: while Juri Lotman was an adherent of structuralism, Gilles Deleuze was a poststructuralist who criticized the structuralist approach. Yet despite this principal difference, both scholars still arrived at similar conclusions as concerns several questions regarding the understanding of the cinema and its very nature. In the present paper I focus on the features of these authors’ approach to spatial and temporal relations in the cinema, audiovisual relations in film as a heterogeneous form of the work of art, virtuality and mythologism in the viewer’s perception of cinema.
The differences and similarities in academic approaches to cinema, developed by Lotman and Deleuze, indicate a common direction in the development of the cinema and visual arts theory, which seems relevant for the study of contemporary audio-visual arts.
|
topic |
Deleuze Lotman spatio-temporal blocs (relations) nonlinear narrative construction movement-image time-image |
url |
https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17092 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mihaelkonstantinov jurilotmangillesdeleuzeandtheirapproachestocinemapointsofintersection |
_version_ |
1721549278205181952 |