Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection

Engaging with the methods of studying contemporary digital audiovisual art is a dominant topic in contemporary theories of art. Against this background, the article offers a view onto some aspects of Juri Lotman’s and Gilles Deleuze’s studies on the cinema. As a rule, contemporary studies of dig...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mihael Konstantinov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2020-12-01
Series:Sign Systems Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17092
id doaj-702467a6ad02486090d6ebda56a0ac76
record_format Article
spelling doaj-702467a6ad02486090d6ebda56a0ac762021-04-02T19:18:44ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092020-12-01482-410.12697/SSS.2020.48.2-4.10Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersectionMihael Konstantinov0The Department of Hebrew and Comparative Literature, The University of Haifa. Aba Khoushy Ave 199, Mount Carmel, Haifa, Israel Engaging with the methods of studying contemporary digital audiovisual art is a dominant topic in contemporary theories of art. Against this background, the article offers a view onto some aspects of Juri Lotman’s and Gilles Deleuze’s studies on the cinema. As a rule, contemporary studies of digital audiovisual art take place in the context of interdisciplinary studies. One of the methodological principles of such studies consists in adopting a structural and semiotic approach. As of today, this methodological approach to studying audio-visual art is most developed in semiotics of the cinema, which is why in this article visual semiotics in general is viewed through semiotics of the cinema (proceeding from the approach of Juri Lotman). Also, the philosophical understanding of the nature of the cinema offered by Gilles Deleuze has proven fundamental for the study of contemporary audio-visual art. The two authors were contemporaries, but represented different scholarly paradigms: while Juri Lotman was an adherent of structuralism, Gilles Deleuze was a poststructuralist who criticized the structuralist approach. Yet despite this principal difference, both scholars still arrived at similar conclusions as concerns several questions regarding the understanding of the cinema and its very nature. In the present paper I focus on the features of these authors’ approach to spatial and temporal relations in the cinema, audiovisual relations in film as a heterogeneous form of the work of art, virtuality and mythologism in the viewer’s perception of cinema. The differences and similarities in academic approaches to cinema, developed by Lotman and Deleuze, indicate a common direction in the development of the cinema and visual arts theory, which seems relevant for the study of contemporary audio-visual arts. https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17092DeleuzeLotmanspatio-temporal blocs (relations)nonlinear narrative constructionmovement-imagetime-image
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mihael Konstantinov
spellingShingle Mihael Konstantinov
Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection
Sign Systems Studies
Deleuze
Lotman
spatio-temporal blocs (relations)
nonlinear narrative construction
movement-image
time-image
author_facet Mihael Konstantinov
author_sort Mihael Konstantinov
title Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection
title_short Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection
title_full Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection
title_fullStr Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection
title_full_unstemmed Juri Lotman, Gilles Deleuze and their approaches to cinema: Points of intersection
title_sort juri lotman, gilles deleuze and their approaches to cinema: points of intersection
publisher University of Tartu Press
series Sign Systems Studies
issn 1406-4243
1736-7409
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Engaging with the methods of studying contemporary digital audiovisual art is a dominant topic in contemporary theories of art. Against this background, the article offers a view onto some aspects of Juri Lotman’s and Gilles Deleuze’s studies on the cinema. As a rule, contemporary studies of digital audiovisual art take place in the context of interdisciplinary studies. One of the methodological principles of such studies consists in adopting a structural and semiotic approach. As of today, this methodological approach to studying audio-visual art is most developed in semiotics of the cinema, which is why in this article visual semiotics in general is viewed through semiotics of the cinema (proceeding from the approach of Juri Lotman). Also, the philosophical understanding of the nature of the cinema offered by Gilles Deleuze has proven fundamental for the study of contemporary audio-visual art. The two authors were contemporaries, but represented different scholarly paradigms: while Juri Lotman was an adherent of structuralism, Gilles Deleuze was a poststructuralist who criticized the structuralist approach. Yet despite this principal difference, both scholars still arrived at similar conclusions as concerns several questions regarding the understanding of the cinema and its very nature. In the present paper I focus on the features of these authors’ approach to spatial and temporal relations in the cinema, audiovisual relations in film as a heterogeneous form of the work of art, virtuality and mythologism in the viewer’s perception of cinema. The differences and similarities in academic approaches to cinema, developed by Lotman and Deleuze, indicate a common direction in the development of the cinema and visual arts theory, which seems relevant for the study of contemporary audio-visual arts.
topic Deleuze
Lotman
spatio-temporal blocs (relations)
nonlinear narrative construction
movement-image
time-image
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/17092
work_keys_str_mv AT mihaelkonstantinov jurilotmangillesdeleuzeandtheirapproachestocinemapointsofintersection
_version_ 1721549278205181952