Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.

BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a persistent health problem in many developing countries throughout the world, and the search for simple and effective treatment continues to be of great importance. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julián Solís García del Pozo, Javier Solera
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3290537?pdf=render
id doaj-702100d8643c468886ac3c7d4181fd88
record_format Article
spelling doaj-702100d8643c468886ac3c7d4181fd882020-11-25T01:17:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0172e3209010.1371/journal.pone.0032090Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.Julián Solís García del PozoJavier SoleraBACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a persistent health problem in many developing countries throughout the world, and the search for simple and effective treatment continues to be of great importance. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Clinical trials published from 1985 to present that assess different antimicrobial regimens in cases of documented acute uncomplicated human brucellosis were included. The primary outcomes were relapse, therapeutic failure, combined variable of relapse and therapeutic failure, and adverse effect rates. A meta-analysis with a fixed effect model was performed and odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A random effect model was used when significant heterogeneity between studies was verified. Comparison of combined doxycycline and rifampicin with a combination of doxycycline and streptomycin favors the latter regimen (OR = 3.17; CI95% = 2.05-4.91). There were no significant differences between combined doxycycline-streptomycin and combined doxycycline-gentamicin (OR = 1.89; CI95% = 0.81-4.39). Treatment with rifampicin and quinolones was similar to combined doxycycline-rifampicin (OR = 1.23; CI95% = 0.63-2.40). Only one study assessed triple therapy with aminoglycoside-doxycycline-rifampicin and only included patients with uncomplicated brucellosis. Thus this approach cannot be considered the therapy of choice until further studies have been performed. Combined doxycycline/co-trimoxazole or doxycycline monotherapy could represent a cost-effective alternative in certain patient groups, and further studies are needed in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Although the preferred treatment in uncomplicated human brucellosis is doxycycline-aminoglycoside combination, other treatments based on oral regimens or monotherapy should not be rejected until they are better studied. Triple therapy should not be considered the current treatment of choice.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3290537?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julián Solís García del Pozo
Javier Solera
spellingShingle Julián Solís García del Pozo
Javier Solera
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Julián Solís García del Pozo
Javier Solera
author_sort Julián Solís García del Pozo
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in the treatment of human brucellosis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a persistent health problem in many developing countries throughout the world, and the search for simple and effective treatment continues to be of great importance. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE and in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Clinical trials published from 1985 to present that assess different antimicrobial regimens in cases of documented acute uncomplicated human brucellosis were included. The primary outcomes were relapse, therapeutic failure, combined variable of relapse and therapeutic failure, and adverse effect rates. A meta-analysis with a fixed effect model was performed and odds ratio with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. A random effect model was used when significant heterogeneity between studies was verified. Comparison of combined doxycycline and rifampicin with a combination of doxycycline and streptomycin favors the latter regimen (OR = 3.17; CI95% = 2.05-4.91). There were no significant differences between combined doxycycline-streptomycin and combined doxycycline-gentamicin (OR = 1.89; CI95% = 0.81-4.39). Treatment with rifampicin and quinolones was similar to combined doxycycline-rifampicin (OR = 1.23; CI95% = 0.63-2.40). Only one study assessed triple therapy with aminoglycoside-doxycycline-rifampicin and only included patients with uncomplicated brucellosis. Thus this approach cannot be considered the therapy of choice until further studies have been performed. Combined doxycycline/co-trimoxazole or doxycycline monotherapy could represent a cost-effective alternative in certain patient groups, and further studies are needed in the future. CONCLUSIONS: Although the preferred treatment in uncomplicated human brucellosis is doxycycline-aminoglycoside combination, other treatments based on oral regimens or monotherapy should not be rejected until they are better studied. Triple therapy should not be considered the current treatment of choice.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3290537?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT juliansolisgarciadelpozo systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrialsinthetreatmentofhumanbrucellosis
AT javiersolera systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedclinicaltrialsinthetreatmentofhumanbrucellosis
_version_ 1725144680391245824