The planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practice

In this article, I set out different relationships between planning theory, research and practice, drawing on Lacan's "production of four discourses". I argue that each element of the planning theory-research-practice 'triad' acts as the discursive 'agent' and give...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ulloa Ignacio Castillo
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: oekom verlag GmbH 2019-04-01
Series:Raumforschung und Raumordnung
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rara.2019.77.issue-2/rara-2019-0009/rara-2019-0009.xml?format=INT
id doaj-701019f9e5fb405a93e41b5ed155caa4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-701019f9e5fb405a93e41b5ed155caa42021-04-02T11:41:42Zdeuoekom verlag GmbHRaumforschung und Raumordnung1869-41792019-04-0177218119810.2478/rara-2019-0009rara-2019-0009The planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practiceUlloa Ignacio Castillo0Technische Universität Berlin, Institut für Stadt- und Regionalplanung, Fachgebiet Städtebau und Siedlungswesen, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 1 | BH 5-1, 10587Berlin, DeutschlandIn this article, I set out different relationships between planning theory, research and practice, drawing on Lacan's "production of four discourses". I argue that each element of the planning theory-research-practice 'triad' acts as the discursive 'agent' and gives rise to particular kinds of 'subject-planner' (the 'master', the 'expert', the 'idealistic' and the 'pragmatic') with specific ideological upshots ('hidden' big other, 'feigned' big other, hysteria and subjective destitution). Primarily a theoretical discussion, the article is also partially underpinned by my own practical experience in planning. While Lacanian psychoanalytical theory has already entered the planning field, its deployment has been mostly centred on deconstructing both planning decision-making processes and the mediation of planners in creating and implementing plans. Hence, the attempt here is to look in more depth at the 'ambivalent' role of the planner as well as to bring in 'planning research', as a key, somewhat occluded, element within the discussion on bridging planning theory and practice. Further, in the literature there seems to be a sort of omnipresent assumption that 'valid' reflection on planning can only come from the 'outside', which in turn perpetuates the role of the academic researcher simply trying to decode and analyse what the practitioner does (or tries to do). Critical impressions from those 'out there', 'on the job', are still missing. They, far from mere anecdotic accounts, ought to comprise self-inflicted criticism triggered by a sense of discomfort with what's being done – by the hysterical question of "why am I a planner?" and "why I am doing this or that?"http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rara.2019.77.issue-2/rara-2019-0009/rara-2019-0009.xml?format=INTplanning theorypsychoanalytical theorylacandiscourseuncertaintyplanungstheoriepsychoanalytische theorielacandiskursunsicherheit
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ulloa Ignacio Castillo
spellingShingle Ulloa Ignacio Castillo
The planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practice
Raumforschung und Raumordnung
planning theory
psychoanalytical theory
lacan
discourse
uncertainty
planungstheorie
psychoanalytische theorie
lacan
diskurs
unsicherheit
author_facet Ulloa Ignacio Castillo
author_sort Ulloa Ignacio Castillo
title The planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practice
title_short The planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practice
title_full The planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practice
title_fullStr The planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practice
title_full_unstemmed The planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practice
title_sort planner's subjective destitution: towards a hysterical-analytical triad of planning theory-research-practice
publisher oekom verlag GmbH
series Raumforschung und Raumordnung
issn 1869-4179
publishDate 2019-04-01
description In this article, I set out different relationships between planning theory, research and practice, drawing on Lacan's "production of four discourses". I argue that each element of the planning theory-research-practice 'triad' acts as the discursive 'agent' and gives rise to particular kinds of 'subject-planner' (the 'master', the 'expert', the 'idealistic' and the 'pragmatic') with specific ideological upshots ('hidden' big other, 'feigned' big other, hysteria and subjective destitution). Primarily a theoretical discussion, the article is also partially underpinned by my own practical experience in planning. While Lacanian psychoanalytical theory has already entered the planning field, its deployment has been mostly centred on deconstructing both planning decision-making processes and the mediation of planners in creating and implementing plans. Hence, the attempt here is to look in more depth at the 'ambivalent' role of the planner as well as to bring in 'planning research', as a key, somewhat occluded, element within the discussion on bridging planning theory and practice. Further, in the literature there seems to be a sort of omnipresent assumption that 'valid' reflection on planning can only come from the 'outside', which in turn perpetuates the role of the academic researcher simply trying to decode and analyse what the practitioner does (or tries to do). Critical impressions from those 'out there', 'on the job', are still missing. They, far from mere anecdotic accounts, ought to comprise self-inflicted criticism triggered by a sense of discomfort with what's being done – by the hysterical question of "why am I a planner?" and "why I am doing this or that?"
topic planning theory
psychoanalytical theory
lacan
discourse
uncertainty
planungstheorie
psychoanalytische theorie
lacan
diskurs
unsicherheit
url http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/rara.2019.77.issue-2/rara-2019-0009/rara-2019-0009.xml?format=INT
work_keys_str_mv AT ulloaignaciocastillo theplannerssubjectivedestitutiontowardsahystericalanalyticaltriadofplanningtheoryresearchpractice
AT ulloaignaciocastillo plannerssubjectivedestitutiontowardsahystericalanalyticaltriadofplanningtheoryresearchpractice
_version_ 1721571700211974144