The foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challenge
The following pages contend that, in spite of its intensive development, contemporary cognitive science has recently entered a phase of fairly acute uncertainty and confusion regarding some of its most essential foundations. They emphasize two aspects of this foundational crisis, specifically vindic...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Editora Universitária Champagnat - PUCPRESS
2010-05-01
|
Series: | Revista de Filosofia |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/2224 |
id |
doaj-7009cdeab94040278ed926555c7ca885 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7009cdeab94040278ed926555c7ca8852020-11-25T03:25:32ZspaEditora Universitária Champagnat - PUCPRESSRevista de Filosofia 0104-44431980-59342010-05-0122309913510.7213/rfa.v22i30.22242236The foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challengeJean-Michel Roy0Center for the Epistemology of Cognitive Science, University of Lyon, Ecole Normale SupérieureThe following pages contend that, in spite of its intensive development, contemporary cognitive science has recently entered a phase of fairly acute uncertainty and confusion regarding some of its most essential foundations. They emphasize two aspects of this foundational crisis, specifically vindicating the existence of a crisis of naturalism and of a crisis of representationalism. Like any foundational crisis, this situation constitutes a serious threat to the significance of the empirical achievements of cognitive science. A threat calling for renewed efforts to provide it with secure foundations that can only be obtained through acloser collaboration between empirical and foundational investigations, or, more concretely, between cognitive scientists and philosophers. They also outline a general strategy to address this threat, and illustrate itabout one aspect of particular importance of the naturalist crisis, namely the emergentist challenge to the orthodoxy of non reductive functionalism. They argue for the rejection of one version of this emergentist challenge,and they lay out a minimal condition that any other version of emergentism must meet. It is still unclear whether this condition is yet satisfactorily met by some version, and in particular by the sort of emergentism associated with the notion of dynamical system. Clarifyingthis issue should accordingly be seen as a top priority on the agenda of cognitive philosophy.https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/2224 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Spanish |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jean-Michel Roy |
spellingShingle |
Jean-Michel Roy The foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challenge Revista de Filosofia |
author_facet |
Jean-Michel Roy |
author_sort |
Jean-Michel Roy |
title |
The foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challenge |
title_short |
The foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challenge |
title_full |
The foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challenge |
title_fullStr |
The foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challenge |
title_full_unstemmed |
The foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challenge |
title_sort |
foundational crisis of cognitive science: challenging the emergentist challenge |
publisher |
Editora Universitária Champagnat - PUCPRESS |
series |
Revista de Filosofia |
issn |
0104-4443 1980-5934 |
publishDate |
2010-05-01 |
description |
The following pages contend that, in spite of its intensive development, contemporary cognitive science has recently entered a phase of fairly acute uncertainty and confusion regarding some of its most essential foundations. They emphasize two aspects of this foundational crisis, specifically vindicating the existence of a crisis of naturalism and of a crisis of representationalism. Like any foundational crisis, this situation constitutes a serious threat to the significance of the empirical achievements of cognitive science. A threat calling for renewed efforts to provide it with secure foundations that can only be obtained through acloser collaboration between empirical and foundational investigations, or, more concretely, between cognitive scientists and philosophers. They also outline a general strategy to address this threat, and illustrate itabout one aspect of particular importance of the naturalist crisis, namely the emergentist challenge to the orthodoxy of non reductive functionalism. They argue for the rejection of one version of this emergentist challenge,and they lay out a minimal condition that any other version of emergentism must meet. It is still unclear whether this condition is yet satisfactorily met by some version, and in particular by the sort of emergentism associated with the notion of dynamical system. Clarifyingthis issue should accordingly be seen as a top priority on the agenda of cognitive philosophy. |
url |
https://periodicos.pucpr.br/index.php/aurora/article/view/2224 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeanmichelroy thefoundationalcrisisofcognitivesciencechallengingtheemergentistchallenge AT jeanmichelroy foundationalcrisisofcognitivesciencechallengingtheemergentistchallenge |
_version_ |
1724596509179117568 |