Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.

As pollinator decline is increasingly reported in natural and agricultural environments, cities are perceived as shelters for pollinators because of low pesticide exposure and high floral diversity throughout the year. This has led to the development of environmental policies supporting pollinators...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lise Ropars, Isabelle Dajoz, Colin Fontaine, Audrey Muratet, Benoît Geslin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222316
id doaj-6ffe7fc6bdf04874bd4d5dfbbd331b42
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ffe7fc6bdf04874bd4d5dfbbd331b422021-03-03T21:07:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01149e022231610.1371/journal.pone.0222316Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.Lise RoparsIsabelle DajozColin FontaineAudrey MuratetBenoît GeslinAs pollinator decline is increasingly reported in natural and agricultural environments, cities are perceived as shelters for pollinators because of low pesticide exposure and high floral diversity throughout the year. This has led to the development of environmental policies supporting pollinators in urban areas. However, policies are often restricted to the promotion of honey bee colony installations, which resulted in a strong increase in apiary numbers in cities. Recently, competition for floral resources between wild pollinators and honey bees has been highlighted in semi-natural contexts, but whether urban beekeeping could impact wild pollinators remains unknown. Here, we show that in the city of Paris (France), wild pollinator visitation rates are negatively correlated to honey bee colony densities present in the surrounding landscape (500m -slope = -0.614; p = 0.001 -and 1000m -slope = -0.489; p = 0.005). Regarding the morphological groups of wild pollinators, large solitary bee and beetle visitation rates were negatively affected by honey bee colony densities within a 500m buffer (slope = -0.425, p = 0.007 and slope = - 0.671, p = 0.002, respectively) and bumblebee visitation rates were negatively affected by honey bee colony density within a 1000m buffer (slope = - 0.451, p = 0.012). Further, lower interaction evenness in plant-pollinator networks was observed with high honey bee colony density within a 1000m buffer (slope = -0.487, p = 0.008). Finally, honey bees tended to focus their foraging activity on managed rather than wild plant species (student t-test, p = 0.001) whereas wild pollinators equally visited managed and wild species. We advocate responsible practices mitigating the introduction of high density of honey bee colonies in urban environments. Further studies are however needed to deepen our knowledge about the potential negative interactions between wild and domesticated pollinators.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222316
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lise Ropars
Isabelle Dajoz
Colin Fontaine
Audrey Muratet
Benoît Geslin
spellingShingle Lise Ropars
Isabelle Dajoz
Colin Fontaine
Audrey Muratet
Benoît Geslin
Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Lise Ropars
Isabelle Dajoz
Colin Fontaine
Audrey Muratet
Benoît Geslin
author_sort Lise Ropars
title Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.
title_short Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.
title_full Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.
title_fullStr Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.
title_full_unstemmed Wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.
title_sort wild pollinator activity negatively related to honey bee colony densities in urban context.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description As pollinator decline is increasingly reported in natural and agricultural environments, cities are perceived as shelters for pollinators because of low pesticide exposure and high floral diversity throughout the year. This has led to the development of environmental policies supporting pollinators in urban areas. However, policies are often restricted to the promotion of honey bee colony installations, which resulted in a strong increase in apiary numbers in cities. Recently, competition for floral resources between wild pollinators and honey bees has been highlighted in semi-natural contexts, but whether urban beekeeping could impact wild pollinators remains unknown. Here, we show that in the city of Paris (France), wild pollinator visitation rates are negatively correlated to honey bee colony densities present in the surrounding landscape (500m -slope = -0.614; p = 0.001 -and 1000m -slope = -0.489; p = 0.005). Regarding the morphological groups of wild pollinators, large solitary bee and beetle visitation rates were negatively affected by honey bee colony densities within a 500m buffer (slope = -0.425, p = 0.007 and slope = - 0.671, p = 0.002, respectively) and bumblebee visitation rates were negatively affected by honey bee colony density within a 1000m buffer (slope = - 0.451, p = 0.012). Further, lower interaction evenness in plant-pollinator networks was observed with high honey bee colony density within a 1000m buffer (slope = -0.487, p = 0.008). Finally, honey bees tended to focus their foraging activity on managed rather than wild plant species (student t-test, p = 0.001) whereas wild pollinators equally visited managed and wild species. We advocate responsible practices mitigating the introduction of high density of honey bee colonies in urban environments. Further studies are however needed to deepen our knowledge about the potential negative interactions between wild and domesticated pollinators.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222316
work_keys_str_mv AT liseropars wildpollinatoractivitynegativelyrelatedtohoneybeecolonydensitiesinurbancontext
AT isabelledajoz wildpollinatoractivitynegativelyrelatedtohoneybeecolonydensitiesinurbancontext
AT colinfontaine wildpollinatoractivitynegativelyrelatedtohoneybeecolonydensitiesinurbancontext
AT audreymuratet wildpollinatoractivitynegativelyrelatedtohoneybeecolonydensitiesinurbancontext
AT benoitgeslin wildpollinatoractivitynegativelyrelatedtohoneybeecolonydensitiesinurbancontext
_version_ 1714818557844389888