Giving consumers a political voice: organized consumerism and the Belgian welfare state, 1957-1981

Immediately after the Second World War, the word ‘consumer’ was an ill-defined signifier. By the early eighties, citizens’ interests were often routinely equated with consumer interests. We can attribute this in no small amount to the rise of consumer movements, who published comparative tests in mo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Giselle Nath
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Journals 2017-09-01
Series:BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
Online Access:https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/6644
id doaj-6ff50188c1384772be85667d1ab15339
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ff50188c1384772be85667d1ab153392021-10-02T15:42:13ZengOpen JournalsBMGN: Low Countries Historical Review0165-05052211-28982017-09-011323Giving consumers a political voice: organized consumerism and the Belgian welfare state, 1957-1981Giselle NathImmediately after the Second World War, the word ‘consumer’ was an ill-defined signifier. By the early eighties, citizens’ interests were often routinely equated with consumer interests. We can attribute this in no small amount to the rise of consumer movements, who published comparative tests in monthly periodicals. These private organizations became the proverbial ‘consumer trade unions’: they drew attention to the producer consumer-cleavage and raised consumer awareness. In Belgium there were two separate consumer movements. Test-Achats (1957-present) promoted individual foresight as the best strategy for consumer protection. The working-class Union Féminine pour l’Information et la Défense du Consommateur (hereafter ufidec, 1959-1984) was an organization led by social-democratic women. ufidec demanded more legal solutions from consumers and believed in strong collective action.   This article investigates how and why consumer organizations gained influence and legitimacy within the welfare state. The government initially rebuffed organized consumerism, only to accommodate it somewhat after the oil crisis in 1973. However, if institutions (or proposed institutions) for consumer politics in Belgium remained relatively weak or ineffective, it was because they represented a compromise between a civil society intent upon its own survival, and a government more than willing to let consumers fend for themselves.   This article is part of the special issue on consumption history. https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/6644
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giselle Nath
spellingShingle Giselle Nath
Giving consumers a political voice: organized consumerism and the Belgian welfare state, 1957-1981
BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
author_facet Giselle Nath
author_sort Giselle Nath
title Giving consumers a political voice: organized consumerism and the Belgian welfare state, 1957-1981
title_short Giving consumers a political voice: organized consumerism and the Belgian welfare state, 1957-1981
title_full Giving consumers a political voice: organized consumerism and the Belgian welfare state, 1957-1981
title_fullStr Giving consumers a political voice: organized consumerism and the Belgian welfare state, 1957-1981
title_full_unstemmed Giving consumers a political voice: organized consumerism and the Belgian welfare state, 1957-1981
title_sort giving consumers a political voice: organized consumerism and the belgian welfare state, 1957-1981
publisher Open Journals
series BMGN: Low Countries Historical Review
issn 0165-0505
2211-2898
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Immediately after the Second World War, the word ‘consumer’ was an ill-defined signifier. By the early eighties, citizens’ interests were often routinely equated with consumer interests. We can attribute this in no small amount to the rise of consumer movements, who published comparative tests in monthly periodicals. These private organizations became the proverbial ‘consumer trade unions’: they drew attention to the producer consumer-cleavage and raised consumer awareness. In Belgium there were two separate consumer movements. Test-Achats (1957-present) promoted individual foresight as the best strategy for consumer protection. The working-class Union Féminine pour l’Information et la Défense du Consommateur (hereafter ufidec, 1959-1984) was an organization led by social-democratic women. ufidec demanded more legal solutions from consumers and believed in strong collective action.   This article investigates how and why consumer organizations gained influence and legitimacy within the welfare state. The government initially rebuffed organized consumerism, only to accommodate it somewhat after the oil crisis in 1973. However, if institutions (or proposed institutions) for consumer politics in Belgium remained relatively weak or ineffective, it was because they represented a compromise between a civil society intent upon its own survival, and a government more than willing to let consumers fend for themselves.   This article is part of the special issue on consumption history.
url https://bmgn-lchr.nl/article/view/6644
work_keys_str_mv AT gisellenath givingconsumersapoliticalvoiceorganizedconsumerismandthebelgianwelfarestate19571981
_version_ 1716853791337218048