Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems
Aim: The objective was to evaluate, quantitative and qualitative, the abrasive effect of three polishing systems on the monolithic zirconia ceramic. Methods: Thirty disk-shaped samples of Yttria Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal (Y-TZP) were randomly distributed in three groups (n = 10) according to...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657266 |
id |
doaj-6ff3407f408d4a09a9735b3d39f9874a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6ff3407f408d4a09a9735b3d39f9874a2021-07-14T18:46:01ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252019-11-011810.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657266Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systemsDeise Caren Somacal0Júlia Willers Dreyer1Patrícia Danesi2Ana Maria Spohr3Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do SulPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do SulPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do SulPontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul Aim: The objective was to evaluate, quantitative and qualitative, the abrasive effect of three polishing systems on the monolithic zirconia ceramic. Methods: Thirty disk-shaped samples of Yttria Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal (Y-TZP) were randomly distributed in three groups (n = 10) according to polishing system: G1- Komet system (KO); G2 - CeraGloss system (CG); G3 - Eve Diacera system (EV). The surface roughness (Ra) was obtained with Rugosimeter in four different moments: a) initial - glaze sample (Ra0); b) after occlusal adjustment with diamond burs (Ra1); c) after polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2); d) after polishing with felt disc and diamond paste (Ra3). Four additional samples were observed in scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: According to the Generalized Estimating Equation followed by the Bonferroni test (α = 0.05), the CG provided the lowest Ra2 (0.63 μm), not differing significantly from the KO (0.78 μm). The highest Ra2 was obtained with the EV (0.97 μm), which did not differ significantly from the KO. There was no statistical difference in Ra between the polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2) and the final polishing with diamond paste (Ra3). SEM images showed that the polishing systems did not completely remove the grooves caused by the diamond burs during the occlusal adjustment. Conclusion: It was concluded that CG promoted smoother surface of the monolithic zirconia ceramic compared to EV, and intermediate smoothness was obtained with KO. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657266Dental polishingSurface propertiesCeramics. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Deise Caren Somacal Júlia Willers Dreyer Patrícia Danesi Ana Maria Spohr |
spellingShingle |
Deise Caren Somacal Júlia Willers Dreyer Patrícia Danesi Ana Maria Spohr Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Dental polishing Surface properties Ceramics. |
author_facet |
Deise Caren Somacal Júlia Willers Dreyer Patrícia Danesi Ana Maria Spohr |
author_sort |
Deise Caren Somacal |
title |
Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems |
title_short |
Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems |
title_full |
Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems |
title_fullStr |
Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems |
title_sort |
surface roughness of monolithic zirconia ceramic submitted to different polishing systems |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
series |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
issn |
1677-3225 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
Aim: The objective was to evaluate, quantitative and qualitative, the abrasive effect of three polishing systems on the monolithic zirconia ceramic. Methods: Thirty disk-shaped samples of Yttria Tetragonal Zirconia Polycrystal (Y-TZP) were randomly distributed in three groups (n = 10) according to polishing system: G1- Komet system (KO); G2 - CeraGloss system (CG); G3 - Eve Diacera system (EV). The surface roughness (Ra) was obtained with Rugosimeter in four different moments: a) initial - glaze sample (Ra0); b) after occlusal adjustment with diamond burs (Ra1); c) after polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2); d) after polishing with felt disc and diamond paste (Ra3). Four additional samples were observed in scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results: According to the Generalized Estimating Equation followed by the Bonferroni test (α = 0.05), the CG provided the lowest Ra2 (0.63 μm), not differing significantly from the KO (0.78 μm). The highest Ra2 was obtained with the EV (0.97 μm), which did not differ significantly from the KO. There was no statistical difference in Ra between the polishing with the abrasive systems (Ra2) and the final polishing with diamond paste (Ra3). SEM images showed that the polishing systems did not completely remove the grooves caused by the diamond burs during the occlusal adjustment. Conclusion: It was concluded that CG promoted smoother surface of the monolithic zirconia ceramic compared to EV, and intermediate smoothness was obtained with KO.
|
topic |
Dental polishing Surface properties Ceramics. |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657266 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT deisecarensomacal surfaceroughnessofmonolithiczirconiaceramicsubmittedtodifferentpolishingsystems AT juliawillersdreyer surfaceroughnessofmonolithiczirconiaceramicsubmittedtodifferentpolishingsystems AT patriciadanesi surfaceroughnessofmonolithiczirconiaceramicsubmittedtodifferentpolishingsystems AT anamariaspohr surfaceroughnessofmonolithiczirconiaceramicsubmittedtodifferentpolishingsystems |
_version_ |
1721302477292175360 |