Extensions of closure spaces

A closure space X is a set endowed with a closure operator P(X) → P(X), satisfying the usual topological axioms, except finite additivity. A T1 closure extension Y of a closure space X induces a structure ϒ on X satisfying the smallness axioms introduced by H. Herrlich [?], except the one on finite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Deses, A. de Groot-Van der Voorde, E. Lowen-Colebunders
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitat Politècnica de València 2003-10-01
Series:Applied General Topology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/AGT/article/view/2028
id doaj-6fec103136ec43d484a2d0ab736fc17f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6fec103136ec43d484a2d0ab736fc17f2020-11-24T22:32:56ZengUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaApplied General Topology1576-94021989-41472003-10-014222324110.4995/agt.2003.20281645Extensions of closure spacesD. Deses0A. de Groot-Van der Voorde1E. Lowen-Colebunders2Vrije Universiteit BrusselVrije Universiteit BrusselVrije Universiteit BrusselA closure space X is a set endowed with a closure operator P(X) → P(X), satisfying the usual topological axioms, except finite additivity. A T1 closure extension Y of a closure space X induces a structure ϒ on X satisfying the smallness axioms introduced by H. Herrlich [?], except the one on finite unions of collections. We'll use the word seminearness for a smallness structure of this type, i.e. satisfying the conditions (S1),(S2),(S3) and (S5) from [?]. In this paper we show that every T1 seminearness structure ϒ on X can in fact be induced by a T1 closure extension. This result is quite different from its topological counterpart which was treated by S.A. Naimpally and J.H.M. Whitfield in [?]. Also in the topological setting the existence of (strict) extensions satisfying higher separation conditions such as T2 and T3 has been completely characterized by means of concreteness, separatedness and regularity [?]. In the closure setting these conditions will appear to be too weak to ensure the existence of suitable (strict) extensions. In this paper we introduce stronger alternatives in order to present internal characterizations of the existence of (strict) T2 or strict regular closure extensions.http://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/AGT/article/view/2028Closure spaceSeminearnessSeparationRegularity(strict) extensionMinimal small stack
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Deses
A. de Groot-Van der Voorde
E. Lowen-Colebunders
spellingShingle D. Deses
A. de Groot-Van der Voorde
E. Lowen-Colebunders
Extensions of closure spaces
Applied General Topology
Closure space
Seminearness
Separation
Regularity
(strict) extension
Minimal small stack
author_facet D. Deses
A. de Groot-Van der Voorde
E. Lowen-Colebunders
author_sort D. Deses
title Extensions of closure spaces
title_short Extensions of closure spaces
title_full Extensions of closure spaces
title_fullStr Extensions of closure spaces
title_full_unstemmed Extensions of closure spaces
title_sort extensions of closure spaces
publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
series Applied General Topology
issn 1576-9402
1989-4147
publishDate 2003-10-01
description A closure space X is a set endowed with a closure operator P(X) → P(X), satisfying the usual topological axioms, except finite additivity. A T1 closure extension Y of a closure space X induces a structure ϒ on X satisfying the smallness axioms introduced by H. Herrlich [?], except the one on finite unions of collections. We'll use the word seminearness for a smallness structure of this type, i.e. satisfying the conditions (S1),(S2),(S3) and (S5) from [?]. In this paper we show that every T1 seminearness structure ϒ on X can in fact be induced by a T1 closure extension. This result is quite different from its topological counterpart which was treated by S.A. Naimpally and J.H.M. Whitfield in [?]. Also in the topological setting the existence of (strict) extensions satisfying higher separation conditions such as T2 and T3 has been completely characterized by means of concreteness, separatedness and regularity [?]. In the closure setting these conditions will appear to be too weak to ensure the existence of suitable (strict) extensions. In this paper we introduce stronger alternatives in order to present internal characterizations of the existence of (strict) T2 or strict regular closure extensions.
topic Closure space
Seminearness
Separation
Regularity
(strict) extension
Minimal small stack
url http://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/AGT/article/view/2028
work_keys_str_mv AT ddeses extensionsofclosurespaces
AT adegrootvandervoorde extensionsofclosurespaces
AT elowencolebunders extensionsofclosurespaces
_version_ 1725731606225747968