Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review
Background: Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) are unique coronal restorative materials used commonly in the management of primary teeth with extensive caries. Aim: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the retentive strength of luting cements for SSCs. Materials and Method...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2020;volume=38;issue=1;spage=2;epage=7;aulast=Virupaxi |
id |
doaj-6fc9bc75ff32451d8c07128247601e39 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6fc9bc75ff32451d8c07128247601e392020-11-25T03:20:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052020-01-013812710.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_313_19Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic reviewShruti VirupaxiRamya PaiPraveen MandroliBackground: Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) are unique coronal restorative materials used commonly in the management of primary teeth with extensive caries. Aim: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the retentive strength of luting cements for SSCs. Materials and Methods: Two reviewers performed a database search of the studies published from 2004 till date. The inclusion criteria were papers published in the English language andin vitro studies on retentive strength of SSC on primary molars. All potentially relevant studies were identified by the title and the abstract. After the full-text analysis, the selected studies were included in the systematic review. Results: Sixteen nonduplicated studies were found. However, after reviewing the articles, only seven were included. Risk bias was assessed. Out of seven studies included in the systematic review, five studies presented medium risk of bias and two studies showed high risk of bias. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, thein vitro literature seems to suggest that the use of self-adhesive resin cements shows higher retentive strength, followed by resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) and conventional GIC. However, RM-GIC can be a preferred luting agent due to its clinical advantages over resin cements. Thus, it can be concluded that choice of cement will depend on individual patient needs and clinical situation.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2020;volume=38;issue=1;spage=2;epage=7;aulast=Virupaxiluting cementretentive strengthstainless steel crown |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shruti Virupaxi Ramya Pai Praveen Mandroli |
spellingShingle |
Shruti Virupaxi Ramya Pai Praveen Mandroli Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry luting cement retentive strength stainless steel crown |
author_facet |
Shruti Virupaxi Ramya Pai Praveen Mandroli |
author_sort |
Shruti Virupaxi |
title |
Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review |
title_short |
Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review |
title_full |
Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review |
title_sort |
retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: a systematic review |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry |
issn |
0970-4388 1998-3905 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Background: Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) are unique coronal restorative materials used commonly in the management of primary teeth with extensive caries. Aim: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the retentive strength of luting cements for SSCs. Materials and Methods: Two reviewers performed a database search of the studies published from 2004 till date. The inclusion criteria were papers published in the English language andin vitro studies on retentive strength of SSC on primary molars. All potentially relevant studies were identified by the title and the abstract. After the full-text analysis, the selected studies were included in the systematic review. Results: Sixteen nonduplicated studies were found. However, after reviewing the articles, only seven were included. Risk bias was assessed. Out of seven studies included in the systematic review, five studies presented medium risk of bias and two studies showed high risk of bias. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, thein vitro literature seems to suggest that the use of self-adhesive resin cements shows higher retentive strength, followed by resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) and conventional GIC. However, RM-GIC can be a preferred luting agent due to its clinical advantages over resin cements. Thus, it can be concluded that choice of cement will depend on individual patient needs and clinical situation. |
topic |
luting cement retentive strength stainless steel crown |
url |
http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2020;volume=38;issue=1;spage=2;epage=7;aulast=Virupaxi |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shrutivirupaxi retentivestrengthoflutingcementsforstainlesssteelcrownsasystematicreview AT ramyapai retentivestrengthoflutingcementsforstainlesssteelcrownsasystematicreview AT praveenmandroli retentivestrengthoflutingcementsforstainlesssteelcrownsasystematicreview |
_version_ |
1724617107053740032 |