Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review

Background: Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) are unique coronal restorative materials used commonly in the management of primary teeth with extensive caries. Aim: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the retentive strength of luting cements for SSCs. Materials and Method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shruti Virupaxi, Ramya Pai, Praveen Mandroli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2020;volume=38;issue=1;spage=2;epage=7;aulast=Virupaxi
id doaj-6fc9bc75ff32451d8c07128247601e39
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6fc9bc75ff32451d8c07128247601e392020-11-25T03:20:42ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry0970-43881998-39052020-01-013812710.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_313_19Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic reviewShruti VirupaxiRamya PaiPraveen MandroliBackground: Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) are unique coronal restorative materials used commonly in the management of primary teeth with extensive caries. Aim: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the retentive strength of luting cements for SSCs. Materials and Methods: Two reviewers performed a database search of the studies published from 2004 till date. The inclusion criteria were papers published in the English language andin vitro studies on retentive strength of SSC on primary molars. All potentially relevant studies were identified by the title and the abstract. After the full-text analysis, the selected studies were included in the systematic review. Results: Sixteen nonduplicated studies were found. However, after reviewing the articles, only seven were included. Risk bias was assessed. Out of seven studies included in the systematic review, five studies presented medium risk of bias and two studies showed high risk of bias. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, thein vitro literature seems to suggest that the use of self-adhesive resin cements shows higher retentive strength, followed by resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) and conventional GIC. However, RM-GIC can be a preferred luting agent due to its clinical advantages over resin cements. Thus, it can be concluded that choice of cement will depend on individual patient needs and clinical situation.http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2020;volume=38;issue=1;spage=2;epage=7;aulast=Virupaxiluting cementretentive strengthstainless steel crown
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shruti Virupaxi
Ramya Pai
Praveen Mandroli
spellingShingle Shruti Virupaxi
Ramya Pai
Praveen Mandroli
Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review
Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
luting cement
retentive strength
stainless steel crown
author_facet Shruti Virupaxi
Ramya Pai
Praveen Mandroli
author_sort Shruti Virupaxi
title Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review
title_short Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review
title_full Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review
title_fullStr Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: A systematic review
title_sort retentive strength of luting cements for stainless steel crowns: a systematic review
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry
issn 0970-4388
1998-3905
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Background: Stainless steel crowns (SSCs) are unique coronal restorative materials used commonly in the management of primary teeth with extensive caries. Aim: The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the retentive strength of luting cements for SSCs. Materials and Methods: Two reviewers performed a database search of the studies published from 2004 till date. The inclusion criteria were papers published in the English language andin vitro studies on retentive strength of SSC on primary molars. All potentially relevant studies were identified by the title and the abstract. After the full-text analysis, the selected studies were included in the systematic review. Results: Sixteen nonduplicated studies were found. However, after reviewing the articles, only seven were included. Risk bias was assessed. Out of seven studies included in the systematic review, five studies presented medium risk of bias and two studies showed high risk of bias. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, thein vitro literature seems to suggest that the use of self-adhesive resin cements shows higher retentive strength, followed by resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RM-GIC) and conventional GIC. However, RM-GIC can be a preferred luting agent due to its clinical advantages over resin cements. Thus, it can be concluded that choice of cement will depend on individual patient needs and clinical situation.
topic luting cement
retentive strength
stainless steel crown
url http://www.jisppd.com/article.asp?issn=0970-4388;year=2020;volume=38;issue=1;spage=2;epage=7;aulast=Virupaxi
work_keys_str_mv AT shrutivirupaxi retentivestrengthoflutingcementsforstainlesssteelcrownsasystematicreview
AT ramyapai retentivestrengthoflutingcementsforstainlesssteelcrownsasystematicreview
AT praveenmandroli retentivestrengthoflutingcementsforstainlesssteelcrownsasystematicreview
_version_ 1724617107053740032