Dramatic increase in reactive volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from ships at berth after implementing the fuel switch policy in the Pearl River Delta Emission Control Area
<p>Limiting fuel sulfur content (FSC) is a widely adopted approach for reducing ship emissions of sulfur dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span>) and particulate matter (PM), particularly in emission control areas (ECAs), but its impact on...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/1887/2020/acp-20-1887-2020.pdf |
id |
doaj-6fbe7f616cb94b8d9fb7d535a1ad0256 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Z. Wu Z. Wu Y. Zhang Y. Zhang J. He H. Chen X. Huang X. Huang Y. Wang X. Yu X. Yu W. Yang W. Yang R. Zhang R. Zhang M. Zhu M. Zhu S. Li S. Li H. Fang H. Fang Z. Zhang X. Wang X. Wang X. Wang |
spellingShingle |
Z. Wu Z. Wu Y. Zhang Y. Zhang J. He H. Chen X. Huang X. Huang Y. Wang X. Yu X. Yu W. Yang W. Yang R. Zhang R. Zhang M. Zhu M. Zhu S. Li S. Li H. Fang H. Fang Z. Zhang X. Wang X. Wang X. Wang Dramatic increase in reactive volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from ships at berth after implementing the fuel switch policy in the Pearl River Delta Emission Control Area Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
author_facet |
Z. Wu Z. Wu Y. Zhang Y. Zhang J. He H. Chen X. Huang X. Huang Y. Wang X. Yu X. Yu W. Yang W. Yang R. Zhang R. Zhang M. Zhu M. Zhu S. Li S. Li H. Fang H. Fang Z. Zhang X. Wang X. Wang X. Wang |
author_sort |
Z. Wu |
title |
Dramatic increase in reactive volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from ships at berth after implementing the fuel switch policy in the Pearl River Delta Emission Control Area |
title_short |
Dramatic increase in reactive volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from ships at berth after implementing the fuel switch policy in the Pearl River Delta Emission Control Area |
title_full |
Dramatic increase in reactive volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from ships at berth after implementing the fuel switch policy in the Pearl River Delta Emission Control Area |
title_fullStr |
Dramatic increase in reactive volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from ships at berth after implementing the fuel switch policy in the Pearl River Delta Emission Control Area |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dramatic increase in reactive volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from ships at berth after implementing the fuel switch policy in the Pearl River Delta Emission Control Area |
title_sort |
dramatic increase in reactive volatile organic compound (voc) emissions from ships at berth after implementing the fuel switch policy in the pearl river delta emission control area |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
issn |
1680-7316 1680-7324 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
<p>Limiting fuel sulfur content (FSC) is a widely adopted
approach for reducing ship emissions of sulfur dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span>) and
particulate matter (PM), particularly in emission control areas (ECAs), but
its impact on the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is still
not well understood. In this study, emissions from ships at berth in
Guangzhou, southern China, were characterized before and after the
implementation of the fuel switch policy (IFSP) with an FSC limit of 0.5 %
in the Pearl River Delta ECA (ECA-PRD). After IFSP, the emission factors (EFs) of
<span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span> and PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> for the coastal vessels decreased by 78 % and
56 % on average, respectively; however, the EFs of the VOCs were <span class="inline-formula">1807±1746</span> mg kg<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>, approximately 15 times that of <span class="inline-formula">118±56.1</span> mg kg<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> before IFSP. This dramatic increase in the emissions of the
VOCs might have been largely due to the replacement of high-sulfur residual
fuel oil with low-sulfur diesel or heavy oils, which are typically richer in
short-chain hydrocarbons. Moreover, reactive alkenes surpassed alkanes to
become the dominant group among the VOCs, and low-carbon-number VOCs, such
as ethylene, propene and isobutane, became the dominant species after IFSP.
As a result of the largely elevated EFs of the reactive alkenes and
aromatics after IFSP, the emitted VOCs per kilogram of fuel burned had nearly 29
times greater ozone formation potential (OFP) and approximately 2 times
greater secondary organic aerosol formation potential (SOAFP) than those
before IFSP. Unlike the coastal vessels, the river vessels in the region
used diesel fuels consistently and were not affected by the fuel switch
policy, but the EFs of their VOCs were 90 % greater than those of the
coastal vessels after IFSP, with approximately 120 % greater fuel-based
OFP and 70 %–140 % greater SOAFP. The results from this study suggest that
while the fuel switch policy could effectively reduce <span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span> and PM
emissions, and thus help control PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> pollution, it will also lead to
greater emissions of reactive VOCs, which may threaten ozone pollution
control in harbor cities. This change for coastal or ocean-going
vessels, in addition to the large amounts of reactive VOCs from the river
vessels, raises regulatory concerns for ship emissions of reactive VOCs.</p> |
url |
https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/1887/2020/acp-20-1887-2020.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT zwu dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT zwu dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT yzhang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT yzhang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT jhe dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT hchen dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT xhuang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT xhuang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT ywang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT xyu dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT xyu dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT wyang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT wyang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT rzhang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT rzhang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT mzhu dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT mzhu dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT sli dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT sli dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT hfang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT hfang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT zzhang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT xwang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT xwang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea AT xwang dramaticincreaseinreactivevolatileorganiccompoundvocemissionsfromshipsatberthafterimplementingthefuelswitchpolicyinthepearlriverdeltaemissioncontrolarea |
_version_ |
1724915474249023488 |
spelling |
doaj-6fbe7f616cb94b8d9fb7d535a1ad02562020-11-25T02:11:14ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Chemistry and Physics1680-73161680-73242020-02-01201887190010.5194/acp-20-1887-2020Dramatic increase in reactive volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from ships at berth after implementing the fuel switch policy in the Pearl River Delta Emission Control AreaZ. Wu0Z. Wu1Y. Zhang2Y. Zhang3J. He4H. Chen5X. Huang6X. Huang7Y. Wang8X. Yu9X. Yu10W. Yang11W. Yang12R. Zhang13R. Zhang14M. Zhu15M. Zhu16S. Li17S. Li18H. Fang19H. Fang20Z. Zhang21X. Wang22X. Wang23X. Wang24State Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaCenter for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, ChinaGuangzhou Environmental Monitoring Center, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaGuangzhou Environmental Monitoring Center, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaYunfu Total Pollutant Discharge Control Center, Yunfu 527300, ChinaGuangzhou Environmental Monitoring Center, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, ChinaChangsha Center for Mineral Resources Exploration, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410013, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Organic Geochemistry and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Resources Utilization, Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, ChinaCenter for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen 361021, ChinaUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China<p>Limiting fuel sulfur content (FSC) is a widely adopted approach for reducing ship emissions of sulfur dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span>) and particulate matter (PM), particularly in emission control areas (ECAs), but its impact on the emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) is still not well understood. In this study, emissions from ships at berth in Guangzhou, southern China, were characterized before and after the implementation of the fuel switch policy (IFSP) with an FSC limit of 0.5 % in the Pearl River Delta ECA (ECA-PRD). After IFSP, the emission factors (EFs) of <span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span> and PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> for the coastal vessels decreased by 78 % and 56 % on average, respectively; however, the EFs of the VOCs were <span class="inline-formula">1807±1746</span> mg kg<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>, approximately 15 times that of <span class="inline-formula">118±56.1</span> mg kg<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> before IFSP. This dramatic increase in the emissions of the VOCs might have been largely due to the replacement of high-sulfur residual fuel oil with low-sulfur diesel or heavy oils, which are typically richer in short-chain hydrocarbons. Moreover, reactive alkenes surpassed alkanes to become the dominant group among the VOCs, and low-carbon-number VOCs, such as ethylene, propene and isobutane, became the dominant species after IFSP. As a result of the largely elevated EFs of the reactive alkenes and aromatics after IFSP, the emitted VOCs per kilogram of fuel burned had nearly 29 times greater ozone formation potential (OFP) and approximately 2 times greater secondary organic aerosol formation potential (SOAFP) than those before IFSP. Unlike the coastal vessels, the river vessels in the region used diesel fuels consistently and were not affected by the fuel switch policy, but the EFs of their VOCs were 90 % greater than those of the coastal vessels after IFSP, with approximately 120 % greater fuel-based OFP and 70 %–140 % greater SOAFP. The results from this study suggest that while the fuel switch policy could effectively reduce <span class="inline-formula">SO<sub>2</sub></span> and PM emissions, and thus help control PM<span class="inline-formula"><sub>2.5</sub></span> pollution, it will also lead to greater emissions of reactive VOCs, which may threaten ozone pollution control in harbor cities. This change for coastal or ocean-going vessels, in addition to the large amounts of reactive VOCs from the river vessels, raises regulatory concerns for ship emissions of reactive VOCs.</p>https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/20/1887/2020/acp-20-1887-2020.pdf |