Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements
<p>Emission estimates of carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) and methane (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>) and the meteorological factors affecting them are investigated over...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
Online Access: | https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/2949/2019/amt-12-2949-2019.pdf |
id |
doaj-6fb66979ce6a4def8938308e305e0ad9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
J.-M. Ryoo J.-M. Ryoo L. T. Iraci T. Tanaka T. Tanaka J. E. Marrero J. E. Marrero E. L. Yates E. L. Yates I. Fung I. Fung A. M. Michalak J. Tadić J. Tadić W. Gore T. P. Bui J. M. Dean-Day J. M. Dean-Day C. S. Chang C. S. Chang |
spellingShingle |
J.-M. Ryoo J.-M. Ryoo L. T. Iraci T. Tanaka T. Tanaka J. E. Marrero J. E. Marrero E. L. Yates E. L. Yates I. Fung I. Fung A. M. Michalak J. Tadić J. Tadić W. Gore T. P. Bui J. M. Dean-Day J. M. Dean-Day C. S. Chang C. S. Chang Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
author_facet |
J.-M. Ryoo J.-M. Ryoo L. T. Iraci T. Tanaka T. Tanaka J. E. Marrero J. E. Marrero E. L. Yates E. L. Yates I. Fung I. Fung A. M. Michalak J. Tadić J. Tadić W. Gore T. P. Bui J. M. Dean-Day J. M. Dean-Day C. S. Chang C. S. Chang |
author_sort |
J.-M. Ryoo |
title |
Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements |
title_short |
Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements |
title_full |
Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements |
title_fullStr |
Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements |
title_sort |
quantification of co<sub>2</sub> and ch<sub>4</sub> emissions over sacramento, california, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
issn |
1867-1381 1867-8548 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
<p>Emission estimates of carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) and methane (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>) and
the meteorological factors affecting them are investigated over Sacramento,
California, using an aircraft equipped with a cavity ring-down greenhouse
gas sensor as part of the Alpha Jet Atmospheric eXperiment (AJAX) project.
To better constrain the emission fluxes, we designed flights in a
cylindrical pattern and computed the emission fluxes from two flights using
a kriging method and Gauss's divergence theorem.</p>
<p>Differences in wind treatment and assumptions about background
concentrations affect the emission estimates by a factor of 1.5 to 7. The
uncertainty is also impacted by meteorological conditions and distance from
the emission sources. The vertical layer averaging affects the flux
estimate, but the choice of raw wind or mass-balanced wind is more important
than the thickness of the vertical averaging for mass-balanced wind for both
urban and local scales.</p>
<p>The importance of vertical mass transfer for flux estimates is examined, and
the difference in the total emission estimate with and without vertical mass
transfer is found to be small, especially at the local scale. The total flux
estimates accounting for the entire circumference are larger than those
based solely on measurements made in the downwind region. This indicates
that a closed-shape flight profile can better contain total emissions
relative to a one-sided curtain flight because most cities have more than
one point source and wind direction can change with time and altitude. To
reduce the uncertainty of the emission estimate, it is important that the
sampling strategy account not only for known source locations but also
possible unidentified sources around the city. Our results highlight that
aircraft-based measurements using a closed-shape flight pattern are an
efficient and useful strategy for identifying emission sources and
estimating local- and city-scale greenhouse gas emission fluxes.</p> |
url |
https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/2949/2019/amt-12-2949-2019.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jmryoo quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT jmryoo quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT ltiraci quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT ttanaka quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT ttanaka quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT jemarrero quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT jemarrero quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT elyates quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT elyates quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT ifung quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT ifung quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT ammichalak quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT jtadic quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT jtadic quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT wgore quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT tpbui quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT jmdeanday quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT jmdeanday quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT cschang quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements AT cschang quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements |
_version_ |
1725069286927499264 |
spelling |
doaj-6fb66979ce6a4def8938308e305e0ad92020-11-25T01:34:58ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482019-05-01122949296610.5194/amt-12-2949-2019Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurementsJ.-M. Ryoo0J.-M. Ryoo1L. T. Iraci2T. Tanaka3T. Tanaka4J. E. Marrero5J. E. Marrero6E. L. Yates7E. L. Yates8I. Fung9I. Fung10A. M. Michalak11J. Tadić12J. Tadić13W. Gore14T. P. Bui15J. M. Dean-Day16J. M. Dean-Day17C. S. Chang18C. S. Chang19Atmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAScience and Technology Corporation (STC), Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAnow at: Japan Weather Association, Tokyo, JapanAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAnow at: Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma, CA 94954, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USABay Area Environmental Research Institute, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USADepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USADepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USAnow at: Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USABay Area Environmental Research Institute, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USABay Area Environmental Research Institute, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA<p>Emission estimates of carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) and methane (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>) and the meteorological factors affecting them are investigated over Sacramento, California, using an aircraft equipped with a cavity ring-down greenhouse gas sensor as part of the Alpha Jet Atmospheric eXperiment (AJAX) project. To better constrain the emission fluxes, we designed flights in a cylindrical pattern and computed the emission fluxes from two flights using a kriging method and Gauss's divergence theorem.</p> <p>Differences in wind treatment and assumptions about background concentrations affect the emission estimates by a factor of 1.5 to 7. The uncertainty is also impacted by meteorological conditions and distance from the emission sources. The vertical layer averaging affects the flux estimate, but the choice of raw wind or mass-balanced wind is more important than the thickness of the vertical averaging for mass-balanced wind for both urban and local scales.</p> <p>The importance of vertical mass transfer for flux estimates is examined, and the difference in the total emission estimate with and without vertical mass transfer is found to be small, especially at the local scale. The total flux estimates accounting for the entire circumference are larger than those based solely on measurements made in the downwind region. This indicates that a closed-shape flight profile can better contain total emissions relative to a one-sided curtain flight because most cities have more than one point source and wind direction can change with time and altitude. To reduce the uncertainty of the emission estimate, it is important that the sampling strategy account not only for known source locations but also possible unidentified sources around the city. Our results highlight that aircraft-based measurements using a closed-shape flight pattern are an efficient and useful strategy for identifying emission sources and estimating local- and city-scale greenhouse gas emission fluxes.</p>https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/2949/2019/amt-12-2949-2019.pdf |