Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements

<p>Emission estimates of carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) and methane (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>) and the meteorological factors affecting them are investigated over...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: J.-M. Ryoo, L. T. Iraci, T. Tanaka, J. E. Marrero, E. L. Yates, I. Fung, A. M. Michalak, J. Tadić, W. Gore, T. P. Bui, J. M. Dean-Day, C. S. Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2019-05-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/2949/2019/amt-12-2949-2019.pdf
id doaj-6fb66979ce6a4def8938308e305e0ad9
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J.-M. Ryoo
J.-M. Ryoo
L. T. Iraci
T. Tanaka
T. Tanaka
J. E. Marrero
J. E. Marrero
E. L. Yates
E. L. Yates
I. Fung
I. Fung
A. M. Michalak
J. Tadić
J. Tadić
W. Gore
T. P. Bui
J. M. Dean-Day
J. M. Dean-Day
C. S. Chang
C. S. Chang
spellingShingle J.-M. Ryoo
J.-M. Ryoo
L. T. Iraci
T. Tanaka
T. Tanaka
J. E. Marrero
J. E. Marrero
E. L. Yates
E. L. Yates
I. Fung
I. Fung
A. M. Michalak
J. Tadić
J. Tadić
W. Gore
T. P. Bui
J. M. Dean-Day
J. M. Dean-Day
C. S. Chang
C. S. Chang
Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
author_facet J.-M. Ryoo
J.-M. Ryoo
L. T. Iraci
T. Tanaka
T. Tanaka
J. E. Marrero
J. E. Marrero
E. L. Yates
E. L. Yates
I. Fung
I. Fung
A. M. Michalak
J. Tadić
J. Tadić
W. Gore
T. P. Bui
J. M. Dean-Day
J. M. Dean-Day
C. S. Chang
C. S. Chang
author_sort J.-M. Ryoo
title Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements
title_short Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements
title_full Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements
title_fullStr Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements
title_sort quantification of co<sub>2</sub> and ch<sub>4</sub> emissions over sacramento, california, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurements
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
publishDate 2019-05-01
description <p>Emission estimates of carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) and methane (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>) and the meteorological factors affecting them are investigated over Sacramento, California, using an aircraft equipped with a cavity ring-down greenhouse gas sensor as part of the Alpha Jet Atmospheric eXperiment (AJAX) project. To better constrain the emission fluxes, we designed flights in a cylindrical pattern and computed the emission fluxes from two flights using a kriging method and Gauss's divergence theorem.</p> <p>Differences in wind treatment and assumptions about background concentrations affect the emission estimates by a factor of 1.5 to 7. The uncertainty is also impacted by meteorological conditions and distance from the emission sources. The vertical layer averaging affects the flux estimate, but the choice of raw wind or mass-balanced wind is more important than the thickness of the vertical averaging for mass-balanced wind for both urban and local scales.</p> <p>The importance of vertical mass transfer for flux estimates is examined, and the difference in the total emission estimate with and without vertical mass transfer is found to be small, especially at the local scale. The total flux estimates accounting for the entire circumference are larger than those based solely on measurements made in the downwind region. This indicates that a closed-shape flight profile can better contain total emissions relative to a one-sided curtain flight because most cities have more than one point source and wind direction can change with time and altitude. To reduce the uncertainty of the emission estimate, it is important that the sampling strategy account not only for known source locations but also possible unidentified sources around the city. Our results highlight that aircraft-based measurements using a closed-shape flight pattern are an efficient and useful strategy for identifying emission sources and estimating local- and city-scale greenhouse gas emission fluxes.</p>
url https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/2949/2019/amt-12-2949-2019.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jmryoo quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT jmryoo quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT ltiraci quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT ttanaka quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT ttanaka quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT jemarrero quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT jemarrero quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT elyates quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT elyates quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT ifung quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT ifung quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT ammichalak quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT jtadic quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT jtadic quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT wgore quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT tpbui quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT jmdeanday quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT jmdeanday quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT cschang quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
AT cschang quantificationofcosub2subandchsub4subemissionsoversacramentocaliforniabasedondivergencetheoremusingaircraftmeasurements
_version_ 1725069286927499264
spelling doaj-6fb66979ce6a4def8938308e305e0ad92020-11-25T01:34:58ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482019-05-01122949296610.5194/amt-12-2949-2019Quantification of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions over Sacramento, California, based on divergence theorem using aircraft measurementsJ.-M. Ryoo0J.-M. Ryoo1L. T. Iraci2T. Tanaka3T. Tanaka4J. E. Marrero5J. E. Marrero6E. L. Yates7E. L. Yates8I. Fung9I. Fung10A. M. Michalak11J. Tadić12J. Tadić13W. Gore14T. P. Bui15J. M. Dean-Day16J. M. Dean-Day17C. S. Chang18C. S. Chang19Atmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAScience and Technology Corporation (STC), Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAnow at: Japan Weather Association, Tokyo, JapanAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAnow at: Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma, CA 94954, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USABay Area Environmental Research Institute, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USADepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USADepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USADepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USAnow at: Climate and Ecosystem Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USABay Area Environmental Research Institute, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USAAtmospheric Science Branch, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USABay Area Environmental Research Institute, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA<p>Emission estimates of carbon dioxide (<span class="inline-formula">CO<sub>2</sub></span>) and methane (<span class="inline-formula">CH<sub>4</sub></span>) and the meteorological factors affecting them are investigated over Sacramento, California, using an aircraft equipped with a cavity ring-down greenhouse gas sensor as part of the Alpha Jet Atmospheric eXperiment (AJAX) project. To better constrain the emission fluxes, we designed flights in a cylindrical pattern and computed the emission fluxes from two flights using a kriging method and Gauss's divergence theorem.</p> <p>Differences in wind treatment and assumptions about background concentrations affect the emission estimates by a factor of 1.5 to 7. The uncertainty is also impacted by meteorological conditions and distance from the emission sources. The vertical layer averaging affects the flux estimate, but the choice of raw wind or mass-balanced wind is more important than the thickness of the vertical averaging for mass-balanced wind for both urban and local scales.</p> <p>The importance of vertical mass transfer for flux estimates is examined, and the difference in the total emission estimate with and without vertical mass transfer is found to be small, especially at the local scale. The total flux estimates accounting for the entire circumference are larger than those based solely on measurements made in the downwind region. This indicates that a closed-shape flight profile can better contain total emissions relative to a one-sided curtain flight because most cities have more than one point source and wind direction can change with time and altitude. To reduce the uncertainty of the emission estimate, it is important that the sampling strategy account not only for known source locations but also possible unidentified sources around the city. Our results highlight that aircraft-based measurements using a closed-shape flight pattern are an efficient and useful strategy for identifying emission sources and estimating local- and city-scale greenhouse gas emission fluxes.</p>https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/12/2949/2019/amt-12-2949-2019.pdf