Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?

Current prophylactic and hygienic measures notwithstanding, implant-related infection remains among leading reasons for failure in orthopaedics and trauma surgery, resulting in extremely high social and economic costs. Various antibacterial coating technologies have been proven safe and effective bo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. L. Romanò, S. A. Bozhkova, V. Artyukh, D. Romanò, H. Tsuchiya, L. Drago
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics 2019-12-01
Series:Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
Subjects:
pji
Online Access:https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1322
id doaj-6fac424965db484d813d5eef3ef76003
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6fac424965db484d813d5eef3ef760032021-07-29T08:01:20ZrusVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsTravmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii2311-29052542-09332019-12-01254647410.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-64-74831Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?C. L. Romanò0S. A. Bozhkova1V. Artyukh2D. Romanò3H. Tsuchiya4L. Drago5Studio Medico Associato Cecca-Romanò, Romano InstituteVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsStudio Medico Associato Cecca-RomanòGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa UniversityUniversity of MilanCurrent prophylactic and hygienic measures notwithstanding, implant-related infection remains among leading reasons for failure in orthopaedics and trauma surgery, resulting in extremely high social and economic costs. Various antibacterial coating technologies have been proven safe and effective both in preclinical and in clinical settings and able to reduce post-surgical infections up to 90%, depending on the type of the coating and on the experimental setup. In spite of this findings, the widespread use of these technologies is still limited by several factors. After reviewing the latest evidence on currently available antibacterial coatings, an algorithm is proposed to calculate the impact of the delayed introduction of these technologies in the clinical practice. When applied to joint arthroplasties, our calculator shows that each year of delay to implement an antibacterial coating, able to reduce post-surgical infection by 80% at a final user’s cost price of €600, causes an estimated 35 200 new cases of periprosthetic joint infection in Europe and additional annual hospital costs of approximately €440 million. Faster and more affordable regulatory pathways for antibacterial coating technologies and an adequate reimbursement policy for their clinical use appear a feasible solution to mitigate the impact of implant-related infections and may benefit patients, healthcare systems, and related research.All patients provided written informed consent.Competing interests: the authors declare that there are no competing interests.https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1322infectionprosthesisimplant coatingperiprosthetic joint infectionpji
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author C. L. Romanò
S. A. Bozhkova
V. Artyukh
D. Romanò
H. Tsuchiya
L. Drago
spellingShingle C. L. Romanò
S. A. Bozhkova
V. Artyukh
D. Romanò
H. Tsuchiya
L. Drago
Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?
Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
infection
prosthesis
implant coating
periprosthetic joint infection
pji
author_facet C. L. Romanò
S. A. Bozhkova
V. Artyukh
D. Romanò
H. Tsuchiya
L. Drago
author_sort C. L. Romanò
title Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?
title_short Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?
title_full Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?
title_fullStr Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?
title_full_unstemmed Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?
title_sort local antibacterial implant protection in orthopedics and trauma: what’s new?
publisher Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
series Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii
issn 2311-2905
2542-0933
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Current prophylactic and hygienic measures notwithstanding, implant-related infection remains among leading reasons for failure in orthopaedics and trauma surgery, resulting in extremely high social and economic costs. Various antibacterial coating technologies have been proven safe and effective both in preclinical and in clinical settings and able to reduce post-surgical infections up to 90%, depending on the type of the coating and on the experimental setup. In spite of this findings, the widespread use of these technologies is still limited by several factors. After reviewing the latest evidence on currently available antibacterial coatings, an algorithm is proposed to calculate the impact of the delayed introduction of these technologies in the clinical practice. When applied to joint arthroplasties, our calculator shows that each year of delay to implement an antibacterial coating, able to reduce post-surgical infection by 80% at a final user’s cost price of €600, causes an estimated 35 200 new cases of periprosthetic joint infection in Europe and additional annual hospital costs of approximately €440 million. Faster and more affordable regulatory pathways for antibacterial coating technologies and an adequate reimbursement policy for their clinical use appear a feasible solution to mitigate the impact of implant-related infections and may benefit patients, healthcare systems, and related research.All patients provided written informed consent.Competing interests: the authors declare that there are no competing interests.
topic infection
prosthesis
implant coating
periprosthetic joint infection
pji
url https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1322
work_keys_str_mv AT clromano localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew
AT sabozhkova localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew
AT vartyukh localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew
AT dromano localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew
AT htsuchiya localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew
AT ldrago localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew
_version_ 1721258846112972800