Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?
Current prophylactic and hygienic measures notwithstanding, implant-related infection remains among leading reasons for failure in orthopaedics and trauma surgery, resulting in extremely high social and economic costs. Various antibacterial coating technologies have been proven safe and effective bo...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1322 |
id |
doaj-6fac424965db484d813d5eef3ef76003 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6fac424965db484d813d5eef3ef760032021-07-29T08:01:20ZrusVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsTravmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii2311-29052542-09332019-12-01254647410.21823/2311-2905-2019-25-4-64-74831Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New?C. L. Romanò0S. A. Bozhkova1V. Artyukh2D. Romanò3H. Tsuchiya4L. Drago5Studio Medico Associato Cecca-Romanò, Romano InstituteVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsVreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and OrthopedicsStudio Medico Associato Cecca-RomanòGraduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa UniversityUniversity of MilanCurrent prophylactic and hygienic measures notwithstanding, implant-related infection remains among leading reasons for failure in orthopaedics and trauma surgery, resulting in extremely high social and economic costs. Various antibacterial coating technologies have been proven safe and effective both in preclinical and in clinical settings and able to reduce post-surgical infections up to 90%, depending on the type of the coating and on the experimental setup. In spite of this findings, the widespread use of these technologies is still limited by several factors. After reviewing the latest evidence on currently available antibacterial coatings, an algorithm is proposed to calculate the impact of the delayed introduction of these technologies in the clinical practice. When applied to joint arthroplasties, our calculator shows that each year of delay to implement an antibacterial coating, able to reduce post-surgical infection by 80% at a final user’s cost price of €600, causes an estimated 35 200 new cases of periprosthetic joint infection in Europe and additional annual hospital costs of approximately €440 million. Faster and more affordable regulatory pathways for antibacterial coating technologies and an adequate reimbursement policy for their clinical use appear a feasible solution to mitigate the impact of implant-related infections and may benefit patients, healthcare systems, and related research.All patients provided written informed consent.Competing interests: the authors declare that there are no competing interests.https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1322infectionprosthesisimplant coatingperiprosthetic joint infectionpji |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
C. L. Romanò S. A. Bozhkova V. Artyukh D. Romanò H. Tsuchiya L. Drago |
spellingShingle |
C. L. Romanò S. A. Bozhkova V. Artyukh D. Romanò H. Tsuchiya L. Drago Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New? Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii infection prosthesis implant coating periprosthetic joint infection pji |
author_facet |
C. L. Romanò S. A. Bozhkova V. Artyukh D. Romanò H. Tsuchiya L. Drago |
author_sort |
C. L. Romanò |
title |
Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New? |
title_short |
Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New? |
title_full |
Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New? |
title_fullStr |
Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Local Antibacterial Implant Protection in Orthopedics and Trauma: What’s New? |
title_sort |
local antibacterial implant protection in orthopedics and trauma: what’s new? |
publisher |
Vreden Russian Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics |
series |
Travmatologiâ i Ortopediâ Rossii |
issn |
2311-2905 2542-0933 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
Current prophylactic and hygienic measures notwithstanding, implant-related infection remains among leading reasons for failure in orthopaedics and trauma surgery, resulting in extremely high social and economic costs. Various antibacterial coating technologies have been proven safe and effective both in preclinical and in clinical settings and able to reduce post-surgical infections up to 90%, depending on the type of the coating and on the experimental setup. In spite of this findings, the widespread use of these technologies is still limited by several factors. After reviewing the latest evidence on currently available antibacterial coatings, an algorithm is proposed to calculate the impact of the delayed introduction of these technologies in the clinical practice. When applied to joint arthroplasties, our calculator shows that each year of delay to implement an antibacterial coating, able to reduce post-surgical infection by 80% at a final user’s cost price of €600, causes an estimated 35 200 new cases of periprosthetic joint infection in Europe and additional annual hospital costs of approximately €440 million. Faster and more affordable regulatory pathways for antibacterial coating technologies and an adequate reimbursement policy for their clinical use appear a feasible solution to mitigate the impact of implant-related infections and may benefit patients, healthcare systems, and related research.All patients provided written informed consent.Competing interests: the authors declare that there are no competing interests. |
topic |
infection prosthesis implant coating periprosthetic joint infection pji |
url |
https://journal.rniito.org/jour/article/view/1322 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT clromano localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew AT sabozhkova localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew AT vartyukh localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew AT dromano localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew AT htsuchiya localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew AT ldrago localantibacterialimplantprotectioninorthopedicsandtraumawhatsnew |
_version_ |
1721258846112972800 |