Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analysis with protocols in Diabetes Mellitus Type II: A systematic review.
<h4>Background</h4>Systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses (SR/MAs) are strongly encouraged to work from a protocol to facilitate high quality, transparent methodology. The completeness of reporting of a protocol (PRISMA-P) and manuscript (PRISMA) is essential to the quality app...
Main Authors: | Daniel Christopher Rainkie, Zeinab Salman Abedini, Nada Nabil Abdelkader |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243091 |
Similar Items
-
Incidence, prevalence and genetic determinants of neonatal diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
by: Jobert Richie N. Nansseu, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01) -
T cell activation and cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
by: Tawanda M. Nyambuya, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Omentin-1 in diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
by: Xiongfeng Pan, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01) -
Screening strategies for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review protocol
by: Helen Mearns, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
The Effects of Qigong on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by: Ding Meng, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)