Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review

Abstract Background Ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) are prescribed to manage difficulty walking due to foot drop, bony foot deformities and poor balance. Traditional AFOs are handmade using thermoplastic vacuum forming which provides limited design options, is labour-intensive and associated with long wai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elizabeth Wojciechowski, Angela Y. Chang, Daniel Balassone, Jacqueline Ford, Tegan L. Cheng, David Little, Manoj P. Menezes, Sean Hogan, Joshua Burns
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-02-01
Series:Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
Subjects:
AFO
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13047-019-0321-6
id doaj-6f9cbe4343dd4c24954650cd003222d3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f9cbe4343dd4c24954650cd003222d32020-11-25T02:40:31ZengBMCJournal of Foot and Ankle Research1757-11462019-02-0112111210.1186/s13047-019-0321-6Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic reviewElizabeth Wojciechowski0Angela Y. Chang1Daniel Balassone2Jacqueline Ford3Tegan L. Cheng4David Little5Manoj P. Menezes6Sean Hogan7Joshua Burns8The University of SydneyThe University of SydneyPaediatric Gait Analysis Service of NSW, The Children’s Hospital at WestmeadPaediatric Gait Analysis Service of NSW, The Children’s Hospital at WestmeadThe University of SydneyThe University of SydneyThe University of SydneyPaediatric Gait Analysis Service of NSW, The Children’s Hospital at WestmeadThe University of SydneyAbstract Background Ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) are prescribed to manage difficulty walking due to foot drop, bony foot deformities and poor balance. Traditional AFOs are handmade using thermoplastic vacuum forming which provides limited design options, is labour-intensive and associated with long wait times. 3D printing has the potential to transform AFO production and health service delivery. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering customised 3D printed AFOs by evaluating the biomechanical outcomes, mechanical properties and fit of 3D printed compared to traditionally manufactured AFOs. Method Electronic databases were searched from January 1985 to June 2018 according to terms related to 3D printing and AFOs. Studies of any design from healthy or pathological populations of any age were eligible for inclusion. Studies must have investigated the effect of customised 3D printed AFOs using any 3D printing technique on outcomes related to walking ability, biomechanical function, mechanical properties, patient comfort, pain and disability. Any other orthotic type or AFOs without a 3D printed calf and foot section were excluded. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE process. Results Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria evaluating 3D printed AFOs in healthy adults, and adults and children with unilateral foot drop from a variety of conditions. 3D printing was used to replicate traditional AFOs and develop novel designs to optimise the stiffness properties or reduce the weight and improve the ease of use of the AFO. 3D printed custom AFOs were found to be comparable to traditional custom AFOs and prefabricated AFOs in terms of temporal-spatial parameters. The mechanical stiffness and energy dissipation of 3D printed AFOs were found to be similar to prefabricated carbon-fibre AFOs. However, the sample sizes were small (n = 1 to 8) and study quality was generally low. Conclusion The biomechanical effects and mechanical properties of 3D printed AFOs were comparable to traditionally manufactured AFOs. Developing novel AFO designs using 3D printing has many potential benefits including stiffness and weight optimisation to improve biomechanical function and comfort.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13047-019-0321-63D printingAdditive manufacturingAnkle foot orthosesAFO
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elizabeth Wojciechowski
Angela Y. Chang
Daniel Balassone
Jacqueline Ford
Tegan L. Cheng
David Little
Manoj P. Menezes
Sean Hogan
Joshua Burns
spellingShingle Elizabeth Wojciechowski
Angela Y. Chang
Daniel Balassone
Jacqueline Ford
Tegan L. Cheng
David Little
Manoj P. Menezes
Sean Hogan
Joshua Burns
Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
3D printing
Additive manufacturing
Ankle foot orthoses
AFO
author_facet Elizabeth Wojciechowski
Angela Y. Chang
Daniel Balassone
Jacqueline Ford
Tegan L. Cheng
David Little
Manoj P. Menezes
Sean Hogan
Joshua Burns
author_sort Elizabeth Wojciechowski
title Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review
title_short Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review
title_full Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review
title_fullStr Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review
title_sort feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3d printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review
publisher BMC
series Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
issn 1757-1146
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Abstract Background Ankle-foot orthoses (AFO) are prescribed to manage difficulty walking due to foot drop, bony foot deformities and poor balance. Traditional AFOs are handmade using thermoplastic vacuum forming which provides limited design options, is labour-intensive and associated with long wait times. 3D printing has the potential to transform AFO production and health service delivery. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering customised 3D printed AFOs by evaluating the biomechanical outcomes, mechanical properties and fit of 3D printed compared to traditionally manufactured AFOs. Method Electronic databases were searched from January 1985 to June 2018 according to terms related to 3D printing and AFOs. Studies of any design from healthy or pathological populations of any age were eligible for inclusion. Studies must have investigated the effect of customised 3D printed AFOs using any 3D printing technique on outcomes related to walking ability, biomechanical function, mechanical properties, patient comfort, pain and disability. Any other orthotic type or AFOs without a 3D printed calf and foot section were excluded. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE process. Results Eleven studies met the eligibility criteria evaluating 3D printed AFOs in healthy adults, and adults and children with unilateral foot drop from a variety of conditions. 3D printing was used to replicate traditional AFOs and develop novel designs to optimise the stiffness properties or reduce the weight and improve the ease of use of the AFO. 3D printed custom AFOs were found to be comparable to traditional custom AFOs and prefabricated AFOs in terms of temporal-spatial parameters. The mechanical stiffness and energy dissipation of 3D printed AFOs were found to be similar to prefabricated carbon-fibre AFOs. However, the sample sizes were small (n = 1 to 8) and study quality was generally low. Conclusion The biomechanical effects and mechanical properties of 3D printed AFOs were comparable to traditionally manufactured AFOs. Developing novel AFO designs using 3D printing has many potential benefits including stiffness and weight optimisation to improve biomechanical function and comfort.
topic 3D printing
Additive manufacturing
Ankle foot orthoses
AFO
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13047-019-0321-6
work_keys_str_mv AT elizabethwojciechowski feasibilityofdesigningmanufacturinganddelivering3dprintedanklefootorthosesasystematicreview
AT angelaychang feasibilityofdesigningmanufacturinganddelivering3dprintedanklefootorthosesasystematicreview
AT danielbalassone feasibilityofdesigningmanufacturinganddelivering3dprintedanklefootorthosesasystematicreview
AT jacquelineford feasibilityofdesigningmanufacturinganddelivering3dprintedanklefootorthosesasystematicreview
AT teganlcheng feasibilityofdesigningmanufacturinganddelivering3dprintedanklefootorthosesasystematicreview
AT davidlittle feasibilityofdesigningmanufacturinganddelivering3dprintedanklefootorthosesasystematicreview
AT manojpmenezes feasibilityofdesigningmanufacturinganddelivering3dprintedanklefootorthosesasystematicreview
AT seanhogan feasibilityofdesigningmanufacturinganddelivering3dprintedanklefootorthosesasystematicreview
AT joshuaburns feasibilityofdesigningmanufacturinganddelivering3dprintedanklefootorthosesasystematicreview
_version_ 1724781122732163072