The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city

Everyday surveillance work is increasingly performed by non-human algorithms. These entities can be conceptualised as machinic flâneurs that engage in distanciated flânerie : subjecting urban flows to a dispassionate, calculative and expansive gaze. This paper provides some theoretical reflections o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gavin JD Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-08-01
Series:Big Data & Society
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720933989
id doaj-6f9097104d4842ce8de4fbdf09899ee6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f9097104d4842ce8de4fbdf09899ee62020-11-25T03:53:13ZengSAGE PublishingBig Data & Society2053-95172020-08-01710.1177/2053951720933989The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box cityGavin JD SmithEveryday surveillance work is increasingly performed by non-human algorithms. These entities can be conceptualised as machinic flâneurs that engage in distanciated flânerie : subjecting urban flows to a dispassionate, calculative and expansive gaze. This paper provides some theoretical reflections on the nascent forms of algorithmic practice materialising in two Australian cities, and some of their implications for urban relations and social justice. It looks at the idealisation – and operational black boxing – of automated watching programs, before considering their impacts on notions such as ‘the right to the city’ and ‘the right to the face’. It will argue that the turn to facial recognition software for the purposes of automating urban governance reconstitutes the meanings and phenomenology of the face. In particular, the fleshly and communicative physicality of the face is reduced to a measurable object that can be identified by a virtualised referent and then consequently tracked. Moreover, the asymmetrical and faceless nature of these machinic programs of recognition unsettles conventional notions of civil inattention and bodily sovereignty, and the prioritisation given to pattern recognition renders them amenable to ideas/ideals from phrenology and physiognomy. In this way, algorithmic governance may generate not only forms of facial vulnerability and estrangement, but also facial artifice, where individuals come to develop tacit and artful ways of de-facing and re-facing in order to subvert the processes of recognition which leverage these modes of biopower. Thus, the datafication of urban governance gives rise to a dynamic biopolitics of the face.https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720933989
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gavin JD Smith
spellingShingle Gavin JD Smith
The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city
Big Data & Society
author_facet Gavin JD Smith
author_sort Gavin JD Smith
title The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city
title_short The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city
title_full The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city
title_fullStr The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city
title_full_unstemmed The politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city
title_sort politics of algorithmic governance in the black box city
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Big Data & Society
issn 2053-9517
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Everyday surveillance work is increasingly performed by non-human algorithms. These entities can be conceptualised as machinic flâneurs that engage in distanciated flânerie : subjecting urban flows to a dispassionate, calculative and expansive gaze. This paper provides some theoretical reflections on the nascent forms of algorithmic practice materialising in two Australian cities, and some of their implications for urban relations and social justice. It looks at the idealisation – and operational black boxing – of automated watching programs, before considering their impacts on notions such as ‘the right to the city’ and ‘the right to the face’. It will argue that the turn to facial recognition software for the purposes of automating urban governance reconstitutes the meanings and phenomenology of the face. In particular, the fleshly and communicative physicality of the face is reduced to a measurable object that can be identified by a virtualised referent and then consequently tracked. Moreover, the asymmetrical and faceless nature of these machinic programs of recognition unsettles conventional notions of civil inattention and bodily sovereignty, and the prioritisation given to pattern recognition renders them amenable to ideas/ideals from phrenology and physiognomy. In this way, algorithmic governance may generate not only forms of facial vulnerability and estrangement, but also facial artifice, where individuals come to develop tacit and artful ways of de-facing and re-facing in order to subvert the processes of recognition which leverage these modes of biopower. Thus, the datafication of urban governance gives rise to a dynamic biopolitics of the face.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720933989
work_keys_str_mv AT gavinjdsmith thepoliticsofalgorithmicgovernanceintheblackboxcity
AT gavinjdsmith politicsofalgorithmicgovernanceintheblackboxcity
_version_ 1724479386987528192