Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract
Interest has recently grown in the application of game theory (GT) to solve a number of diverse problems in the field of construction. The use of GT by a general contractor (GC) of construction works to indicate the best strategy leading to winning court proceedings in a situation of conflict with i...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1983 |
id |
doaj-6f907facbca94064bd40d466e9d2642e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6f907facbca94064bd40d466e9d2642e2020-11-25T02:31:34ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-04-01117198310.3390/su11071983su11071983Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction ContractBeata Grzyl0Magdalena Apollo1Adam Kristowski2Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 80-233 Gdańsk, PolandGdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 80-233 Gdańsk, PolandGdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 80-233 Gdańsk, PolandInterest has recently grown in the application of game theory (GT) to solve a number of diverse problems in the field of construction. The use of GT by a general contractor (GC) of construction works to indicate the best strategy leading to winning court proceedings in a situation of conflict with investor (IN), has not been investigated until now. Thus the aim of this paper is to indicate the optimal strategy from the GC viewpoint in a conflict situation with the IN. The article presents a list of the most common causes of conflict between parties of a construction work contract, defines the background of the problem and the cause of the dispute, and subsequently the authors generate a theoretical model of the game. Based on the analyzed game model, the expected payoffs for players were calculated and the probability boundary value determined in making the GC apply the indicated strategy. The study results show that while the probability of issuing a judgment favorable for the GC is at least equal to 0.69 it is justified to use an aggressive strategy. The analysis also confirms that from the financial perspective, litigation in most cases of conflicts in the area of construction should be the ultimate choice.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1983civil engineeringconstruction contractcourt strategyconflict modelingdecision analysisgame theory |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Beata Grzyl Magdalena Apollo Adam Kristowski |
spellingShingle |
Beata Grzyl Magdalena Apollo Adam Kristowski Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract Sustainability civil engineering construction contract court strategy conflict modeling decision analysis game theory |
author_facet |
Beata Grzyl Magdalena Apollo Adam Kristowski |
author_sort |
Beata Grzyl |
title |
Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract |
title_short |
Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract |
title_full |
Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract |
title_fullStr |
Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract |
title_full_unstemmed |
Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract |
title_sort |
application of game theory to conflict management in a construction contract |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Interest has recently grown in the application of game theory (GT) to solve a number of diverse problems in the field of construction. The use of GT by a general contractor (GC) of construction works to indicate the best strategy leading to winning court proceedings in a situation of conflict with investor (IN), has not been investigated until now. Thus the aim of this paper is to indicate the optimal strategy from the GC viewpoint in a conflict situation with the IN. The article presents a list of the most common causes of conflict between parties of a construction work contract, defines the background of the problem and the cause of the dispute, and subsequently the authors generate a theoretical model of the game. Based on the analyzed game model, the expected payoffs for players were calculated and the probability boundary value determined in making the GC apply the indicated strategy. The study results show that while the probability of issuing a judgment favorable for the GC is at least equal to 0.69 it is justified to use an aggressive strategy. The analysis also confirms that from the financial perspective, litigation in most cases of conflicts in the area of construction should be the ultimate choice. |
topic |
civil engineering construction contract court strategy conflict modeling decision analysis game theory |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1983 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT beatagrzyl applicationofgametheorytoconflictmanagementinaconstructioncontract AT magdalenaapollo applicationofgametheorytoconflictmanagementinaconstructioncontract AT adamkristowski applicationofgametheorytoconflictmanagementinaconstructioncontract |
_version_ |
1724823701154693120 |