Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract

Interest has recently grown in the application of game theory (GT) to solve a number of diverse problems in the field of construction. The use of GT by a general contractor (GC) of construction works to indicate the best strategy leading to winning court proceedings in a situation of conflict with i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beata Grzyl, Magdalena Apollo, Adam Kristowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1983
id doaj-6f907facbca94064bd40d466e9d2642e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f907facbca94064bd40d466e9d2642e2020-11-25T02:31:34ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502019-04-01117198310.3390/su11071983su11071983Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction ContractBeata Grzyl0Magdalena Apollo1Adam Kristowski2Gdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 80-233 Gdańsk, PolandGdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 80-233 Gdańsk, PolandGdańsk University of Technology, Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 80-233 Gdańsk, PolandInterest has recently grown in the application of game theory (GT) to solve a number of diverse problems in the field of construction. The use of GT by a general contractor (GC) of construction works to indicate the best strategy leading to winning court proceedings in a situation of conflict with investor (IN), has not been investigated until now. Thus the aim of this paper is to indicate the optimal strategy from the GC viewpoint in a conflict situation with the IN. The article presents a list of the most common causes of conflict between parties of a construction work contract, defines the background of the problem and the cause of the dispute, and subsequently the authors generate a theoretical model of the game. Based on the analyzed game model, the expected payoffs for players were calculated and the probability boundary value determined in making the GC apply the indicated strategy. The study results show that while the probability of issuing a judgment favorable for the GC is at least equal to 0.69 it is justified to use an aggressive strategy. The analysis also confirms that from the financial perspective, litigation in most cases of conflicts in the area of construction should be the ultimate choice.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1983civil engineeringconstruction contractcourt strategyconflict modelingdecision analysisgame theory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Beata Grzyl
Magdalena Apollo
Adam Kristowski
spellingShingle Beata Grzyl
Magdalena Apollo
Adam Kristowski
Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract
Sustainability
civil engineering
construction contract
court strategy
conflict modeling
decision analysis
game theory
author_facet Beata Grzyl
Magdalena Apollo
Adam Kristowski
author_sort Beata Grzyl
title Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract
title_short Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract
title_full Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract
title_fullStr Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract
title_full_unstemmed Application of Game Theory to Conflict Management in a Construction Contract
title_sort application of game theory to conflict management in a construction contract
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Interest has recently grown in the application of game theory (GT) to solve a number of diverse problems in the field of construction. The use of GT by a general contractor (GC) of construction works to indicate the best strategy leading to winning court proceedings in a situation of conflict with investor (IN), has not been investigated until now. Thus the aim of this paper is to indicate the optimal strategy from the GC viewpoint in a conflict situation with the IN. The article presents a list of the most common causes of conflict between parties of a construction work contract, defines the background of the problem and the cause of the dispute, and subsequently the authors generate a theoretical model of the game. Based on the analyzed game model, the expected payoffs for players were calculated and the probability boundary value determined in making the GC apply the indicated strategy. The study results show that while the probability of issuing a judgment favorable for the GC is at least equal to 0.69 it is justified to use an aggressive strategy. The analysis also confirms that from the financial perspective, litigation in most cases of conflicts in the area of construction should be the ultimate choice.
topic civil engineering
construction contract
court strategy
conflict modeling
decision analysis
game theory
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/7/1983
work_keys_str_mv AT beatagrzyl applicationofgametheorytoconflictmanagementinaconstructioncontract
AT magdalenaapollo applicationofgametheorytoconflictmanagementinaconstructioncontract
AT adamkristowski applicationofgametheorytoconflictmanagementinaconstructioncontract
_version_ 1724823701154693120