Inclusive Institutions for Sustainable Economic Development

In recent two decades, due to contributions of political macroeconomics, the focus of macroeconomics turned away from a narrow perspective based on market and privatisation (market fundamentalism) towards a broader perspective based on institutions and values (institutionalism). Within the instituti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jakšić Miomir, Jakšić Milica
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2018-01-01
Series:Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2018-0001
id doaj-6f7938df5c16433cbde398f3ea0f093c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f7938df5c16433cbde398f3ea0f093c2021-09-06T19:41:32ZengSciendoJournal of Central Banking Theory and Practice2336-92052018-01-017151610.2478/jcbtp-2018-0001jcbtp-2018-0001Inclusive Institutions for Sustainable Economic DevelopmentJakšić Miomir0Jakšić Milica1Full professor, Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, SerbiaAssistant professor, Modern Business School, Belgrade, SerbiaIn recent two decades, due to contributions of political macroeconomics, the focus of macroeconomics turned away from a narrow perspective based on market and privatisation (market fundamentalism) towards a broader perspective based on institutions and values (institutionalism). Within the institutional paradigm, the emphasis nowadays is put on inclusive institutions. The main thesis of one of leading proponents of political macroeconomics, D. Acemoglu, is: “growth is much more likely under inclusive (economic and political) institutions than extractive institutions.” Good institutions are characterized by three attributes: 1) they establish and protect property rights; 2) they restrict social elites which strive to expropriate income and property of others members of society; 3) they provide equal chances for employment, social security and civil rights to all individuals. Good institutions contribute to political stability, successful macroeconomic policy, and enhance initiatives. The key role of institutions is to secure stability and continuity. Extractive institutions can negatively affect entrepreneurship and entire economic development in two ways: a) by increasing the opportunity cost, resulting in upward movement of the opportunity cost curve; and b) by affecting return to entrepreneurship resulting in leftward movement of the return to entrepreneurship curve. Apart from independence and accountability of institutions what is needed is sufficient level of inclusion. Inclusion should encompass three dimensions: personal, financial, and political. The introduction of principles of independence, accountability, and inclusion is essential for emergence and performance of all institutions.https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2018-0001political macroeconomyinclusive institutionssustainabilitygood governance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jakšić Miomir
Jakšić Milica
spellingShingle Jakšić Miomir
Jakšić Milica
Inclusive Institutions for Sustainable Economic Development
Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice
political macroeconomy
inclusive institutions
sustainability
good governance
author_facet Jakšić Miomir
Jakšić Milica
author_sort Jakšić Miomir
title Inclusive Institutions for Sustainable Economic Development
title_short Inclusive Institutions for Sustainable Economic Development
title_full Inclusive Institutions for Sustainable Economic Development
title_fullStr Inclusive Institutions for Sustainable Economic Development
title_full_unstemmed Inclusive Institutions for Sustainable Economic Development
title_sort inclusive institutions for sustainable economic development
publisher Sciendo
series Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice
issn 2336-9205
publishDate 2018-01-01
description In recent two decades, due to contributions of political macroeconomics, the focus of macroeconomics turned away from a narrow perspective based on market and privatisation (market fundamentalism) towards a broader perspective based on institutions and values (institutionalism). Within the institutional paradigm, the emphasis nowadays is put on inclusive institutions. The main thesis of one of leading proponents of political macroeconomics, D. Acemoglu, is: “growth is much more likely under inclusive (economic and political) institutions than extractive institutions.” Good institutions are characterized by three attributes: 1) they establish and protect property rights; 2) they restrict social elites which strive to expropriate income and property of others members of society; 3) they provide equal chances for employment, social security and civil rights to all individuals. Good institutions contribute to political stability, successful macroeconomic policy, and enhance initiatives. The key role of institutions is to secure stability and continuity. Extractive institutions can negatively affect entrepreneurship and entire economic development in two ways: a) by increasing the opportunity cost, resulting in upward movement of the opportunity cost curve; and b) by affecting return to entrepreneurship resulting in leftward movement of the return to entrepreneurship curve. Apart from independence and accountability of institutions what is needed is sufficient level of inclusion. Inclusion should encompass three dimensions: personal, financial, and political. The introduction of principles of independence, accountability, and inclusion is essential for emergence and performance of all institutions.
topic political macroeconomy
inclusive institutions
sustainability
good governance
url https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2018-0001
work_keys_str_mv AT jaksicmiomir inclusiveinstitutionsforsustainableeconomicdevelopment
AT jaksicmilica inclusiveinstitutionsforsustainableeconomicdevelopment
_version_ 1717766013762666496