To what extent can aerosol water explain the discrepancy between model calculated and gravimetric PM<sub>10</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub>?
Inter-comparisons of European air quality models show that regional transport models, including the EMEP (Co-operative Programme for monitoring and evaluation of the long-range transmission of air pollutants in Europe) aerosol model, tend to underestimate the observed concentrations of PM<sub>...
Main Author: | S. G. Tsyro |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2005-01-01
|
Series: | Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics |
Online Access: | http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/5/515/2005/acp-5-515-2005.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Carbonaceous Aerosols in PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, and PM<sub>10</sub> Size Fractions over the Lanzhou City, Northwest China
by: Xin Zhang, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
Spatial and temporal variations of the concentrations of PM<sub>10</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>1</sub> in China
by: Y. Q. Wang, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01) -
Mass and chemical composition of size-segregated aerosols (PM<sub>1</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub>, PM<sub>10</sub>) over Athens, Greece: local versus regional sources
by: N. Mihalopoulos, et al.
Published: (2011-11-01) -
Water soluble aerosols and gases at a UK background site – Part 1: Controls of PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> aerosol composition
by: M. M. Twigg, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01) -
Ionic and carbonaceous compositions of PM<sub>10</sub>, PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>1.0</sub> at Gosan ABC Superstation and their ratios as source signature
by: S. Kim, et al.
Published: (2012-02-01)